Home » Posts tagged 'mining'

Tag Archives: mining

#URU URU Metals Ltd – Zeb Nickel Project 3D Modelling

URU Metals Limited (“URU” or the “Company”) is pleased to provide a further update on the ongoing 3D geological modelling programme at the Zeb Nickel Project in Limpopo, South Africa.

Atticus Geoscience has now completed the first stage of 3D mineralisation modelling of the Project’s Zone 2 Ni-Cu-PGE system using historical and recent drill hole data.

The modelling has defined multiple coherent PGE mineralisation envelopes within the Critical Zone rocks and has highlighted a well-developed higher-grade mineralised domain in the southeast of the Project, together with further mineralised zones extending along strike towards the northwest.

Highlights

·    3D modelling has defined multiple coherent PGE mineralisation envelopes within the Critical Zone-hosted Zone 2 Ni-Cu-PGE system.

·    The mineralisation is hosted predominantly within the Critical Zone pyroxenitic package.

·    The strongest and best-developed higher-grade mineralised domain occurs in the southeast of the Project area, where drilling density is also greatest.

·    Additional higher-grade mineralised zones have been identified along strike towards the northwest.

·   The apparent break in mineralisation through parts of the central area may reflect the historical drilling pattern, as several older boreholes terminated before reaching the Critical Zone.

·    The geological setting and style of Zone 2 mineralisation are consistent with the broader Northern Limb Ni-Cu-PGE mineralising system represented by Ivanhoe Mines’ Platreef Mine and Valterra Platinum’s Mogalakwena Mining Complex.

·    The higher-grade mineralisation lies close to the interpreted chonolith and conduit system between the Uitloop I and Uitloop II ultramafic bodies.

·    This relationship provides an important exploration vector, as repeated magma flow through the interpreted plumbing system may have created favourable conditions for sulphide saturation and concentration of Ni-Cu-PGE mineralisation.

·    Future drilling will initially focus on the better-developed higher-grade areas in the southeast, with the aim of generating sufficient drilling to support a maiden mineral resource for Zone 2.

·   Subsequent step-out drilling will test the central area and the possible continuity between the southeastern and northwestern mineralised domains.

·    Ground FDEM Target 1 remains a separate high-priority drill target for semi-massive to massive sulphides within the interpreted chonolith system.

Zone 2 Mineralisation Model

Atticus has used the available Pt, Pd and Rh assay data to construct three-dimensional mineralisation envelopes through the Zone 2 Critical Zone.

For modelling purposes, a 3PGE grade of 0.08 g/t Pt+Pd+Rh was used to define the broader mineralised envelope, while 0.5 g/t 3PGE was used to identify the higher-grade mineralised population. These thresholds are modelling parameters and are not mineral resource cut-off grades.

The resulting model shows that Zone 2 mineralisation is concentrated predominantly within the Critical Zone pyroxenitic package and associated Marginal Facies.

The higher-grade mineralisation is best developed in the southeastern part of the Project, where the current drilling density is greatest. Additional higher-grade mineralised areas occur along strike towards the northwest.

Importantly, the apparent reduction in mineralisation through parts of the central area may not represent a genuine geological break. Several historical boreholes in this area terminated before reaching the interpreted Critical Zone, leaving a material portion of the prospective horizon effectively untested.

The southeastern area also contains the highest PGE grades currently represented in the model, with drilling having intersected grades of up to approximately 6 g/t 3PGE+Au.

Figure 1: PGE mineralisation envelopes within the Critical Zone rocks.  

Figure 2: PGE mineralisation envelopes within the Critical Zone rocks, showing a well-developed higher-grade mineralised domain in the southeastern part of the Project area.

 

Northern Limb Context

The style of Zone 2 mineralisation being modelled at Zeb is consistent with the broader Ni-Cu-PGE mineralising environment of the Northern Limb of the Bushveld Complex.

Approximately the same regional geological package hosts Ivanhoe Mines’ Platreef deposit and Valterra Platinum’s Mogalakwena Mining Complex, both of which contain substantial PGM mineralisation with associated nickel and copper within thick, pyroxenite-rich intrusive sequences.

Ivanhoe describes the Platreef mineralised sequence as comprising norite, pyroxenite and harzburgite, with its principal mineralised units correlated with the Upper Critical Zone of the Bushveld Complex. At Mogalakwena, Valterra describes the Platreef as a thick, heterogeneous mafic package dominated by pyroxenite and norite, with significant nickel and copper associated with the PGM mineralisation.

URU has previously highlighted the similarity between these Northern Limb mineralisation styles and the Critical Zone-hosted Ni-Cu-PGE mineralisation intersected at Zeb. The new 3D modelling strengthens this interpretation by demonstrating coherent mineralised envelopes within the Critical Zone pyroxenitic package rather than isolated mineralised drill intersections.

Relationship to the Chonolith System

A further important outcome of the modelling is the spatial relationship between the higher-grade Zone 2 mineralisation and the interpreted chonolith and conduit system between the Uitloop I and Uitloop II ultramafic bodies.

The higher-grade mineralised envelopes occur relatively close to these interpreted intrusive conduits.

This is consistent with the Company’s broader geological model for Zeb. Repeated or sustained magma flow through a chonolith-style plumbing system may have promoted sulphide saturation and provided favourable conditions for the development and concentration of Ni-Cu-PGE mineralisation.

The relationship between the mineralised envelopes and the interpreted plumbing system gives the Company an additional geological vector for future drilling and will be considered together with the airborne and ground EM responses, gravity and magnetic data and the 3D intrusive model.

Figure 3: Spatial relationship between the higher-grade Zone 2 mineralisation and the interpreted chonolith and conduit system connecting the Uitloop I and Uitloop II ultramafic bodies.

 

Building Towards a Maiden Zone 2 Resource

The completed mineralisation model gives the Company a much clearer basis for planning the next phase of drilling.

Initial drilling will focus on the better-developed higher-grade southeastern mineralised domain, where the objective will be to increase drill density and test extensions to the known mineralisation.

The Company intends to use this work to build sufficient geological continuity and drilling density to support a maiden mineral resource estimate for Zone 2.

Further step-out drilling will then test the central area between the southeastern and northwestern mineralised zones. This work will determine whether the currently modelled domains are separate bodies or parts of a more continuous Critical Zone mineralised system that has simply not been adequately tested by the historical drilling.

Ground FDEM Target 1 remains a separate high-priority exploration target. The discrete conductor sits within the interpreted chonolith system at a favourable change in intrusive geometry and will be tested for a possible concentration of semi-massive to massive Ni-Cu-PGE sulphides.

The Company’s geological team will now use the completed mineralisation model, together with the airborne and ground EM, gravity and magnetic datasets, to finalise and rank the proposed drill holes within the available exploration budget.

Richard Montjoie, Exploration Manager of URU Metals, commented:

“Simon’s work has now given us a proper 3D view of where the Zone 2 mineralisation sits and, importantly, where the higher-grade parts of the system are developing.

The southeast is clearly the most advanced area and gives us a sensible place to start building towards a maiden Zone 2 resource. We are also seeing mineralisation continuing along strike to the northwest, while much of the ground in between has simply not been properly tested because a number of the historical holes stopped short.

The Critical Zone setting is also important. This is the same broad geological environment that hosts the Ni-Cu-PGE mineralisation at Ivanhoe’s Platreef and Valterra’s Mogalakwena operations nearby. We have talked about that relationship for some time, but the Leapfrog work is now allowing us to see the geometry of the Zeb mineralisation properly in three dimensions.

The fact that the higher-grade envelopes also sit close to the interpreted chonolith system fits well with our geological model and gives us another vector for drilling. We now have a much clearer strategy: build out the higher-grade Zone 2 mineralisation towards a maiden resource, test whether those mineralised areas connect through the central gap, and drill Target 1 for the more concentrated sulphide target.”

ENDS

For further information, please contact:

URU Metals Limited
John Zorbas
Chief Executive Officer
+1 416 504 3978

SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP
Nominated Adviser and Broker
Ewan Leggat / Caroline Rowe
+44 (0) 203 470 0470

Axis Capital Markets Limited
Joint Broker
Richard Hutchison
+44 (0) 203 026 0320

Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) Disclosure

This announcement contains inside information for the purposes of Article 7 of the Market Abuse Regulation (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of United Kingdom domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (“UK MAR”). Upon the publication of this announcement via a Regulatory Information Service, this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.

#KDNC Cadence Minerals PLC – Investor Presentation via Investor Meet Company

CADENCE MINERALS PLC (AIM: KDNC) is pleased to announce that Chief Executive Officer, Kiran Morzaria will provide a live presentation via Investor Meet Company on 04 Sept 2026 at 10:00 BST.

 

The presentation is open to all existing and potential shareholders. Questions can be submitted pre-event via your Investor Meet Company dashboard up until 03 Sept 2026, 09:00 BST, or at any time during the live presentation.

 

Investors can sign up to Investor Meet Company for free and add to meet CADENCE MINERALS PLC via:

 

https://www.investormeetcompany.com/cadence-minerals-plc/register-investor

 

Investors who already follow CADENCE MINERALS PLC on the Investor Meet Company platform will automatically be invited.

 

 

 

For further information, contact:

 

 

Cadence Minerals plc

+44 (0) 20 3582 6636

Andrew Suckling

Kiran Morzaria

 

Zeus (NOMAD & Broker)

+44 (0) 20 3829 5000

James Joyce

Darshan Patel

 

Fortified Securities – Joint Broker

+44 (0) 20 3411 7773

Guy Wheatley

 

Brand Communications

+44 (0) 7976 431608

Public & Investor Relations              

Alan Green

#AYM Anglesey Mining PLC – James McFarlane Confirmed as Principal Geologist

Anglesey Mining plc (AIM: AYM), the UK-based mineral exploration and development company and the 100% owner of the Parys Mountain Cu-Zn-Pb-Ag-Au VMS project (“Parys Mt.”) in Anglesey, North Wales, is pleased to confirm the appointment of James McFarlane as Principal Geologist on a retained basis, as outlined in a recent regulatory announcement .

 

James is a Chartered Geologist and Chartered Engineer with more than 20 years’ of international experience spanning mineral exploration, resource evaluation, mine development and mining operations. Throughout his career, he has led geological programmes, resource studies, technical due diligence and project development across a range of base and precious metal projects, with specific knowledge in volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits and UK mine development. His background combines technical excellence with practical operational and project delivery experience.

Working as part of the Company’s executive management team, James will provide strategic geological and geometallurgical leadership to support the advancement of the Parys Mountain project. His responsibilities will include progressing geological interpretation, guiding future Mineral Resource updates and exploration strategy, supporting the ongoing economic reassessment of the project and mentoring the Company’s recently appointed Exploration Geologist.

Further information on James’ professional background can be found via his LinkedIn profile .

Andrew Fulton, Chief Executive Officer of Anglesey Mining , commented:

“We are delighted to welcome James to Anglesey Mining. Parys Mountain is the product of decades of geological work and technical commitment. Our objective is to build on those strong foundations by applying today’s technical expertise and disciplined project development to unlock the considerable future value of the asset. James’ experience across exploration, resource development and mining operations, together with his understanding of UK projects, makes him an excellent addition to our technical team as we continue to advance Parys Mountain”

James McFarlane, Principal Geologist of Anglesey Mining , commented:

“Parys Mountain is one of the UK’s most exciting polymetallic development projects, with considerable exploration upside alongside an established Mineral Resource. I look forward to working with the team to enhance the geological understanding of the project and support its progression towards development.”

For further information, please visit the Company’s website: www.angleseymining.co.uk

 

-Ends-

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Anglesey Mining plc (via Yellow Jersey PR Limited)

Jim Williams, Executive Chairman

Andrew Fulton, CEO

angleseymining@yellowjerseypr.com

 

Davy

Nominated Adviser & Joint Corporate Broker

Brian Garrahy/Daragh O’Reilly

Tel: +353 1 679 6363

 

AlbR Capital Limited

Joint Corporate Broker

Lucy Williams/Duncan Vasey

Tel: +44 (0)20 7562 0930

 

Yellow Jersey PR Limited

Financial & Media Relations

Dominic Barretto/Shivantha Thambirajah

Tel: +44 (0)20 3004 9512

 

About Anglesey Mining plc:

Anglesey is advancing the UK’s largest polymetallic VMS project at the 100% owned Parys Mountain Cu-Zn-Pb-Ag-Au VMS deposit in North Wales.

#FDR First Development Resources PLC – Selta: Site Preparation at Lander West

First Development Resources plc (AIM: FDR), the UK-based, Australia-focused mineral exploration company, is pleased to announce that site preparation activities have commenced at the Company’s flagship Lander West Gold Target within the Selta Project in Australia’s Northern Territory.

The Company’s field team has mobilised to the Lander West project area and has commenced final site preparation activities ahead of the Company’s maiden Phase I Reverse Circulation (“RC”) drilling programme. The drill rig is expected to arrive on site in the coming days, with drilling anticipated to commence shortly thereafter.

HIGHLIGHTS

·    Site preparation has commenced at the Lander West Gold Target.

·    Drill rig expected to arrive on site in the coming days.

·    All regulatory approvals and statutory requirements now complete.

·    Phase I RC drilling anticipated to commence following rig mobilisation and final site preparations.

Tristan Pottas, Chief Executive Officer of FDR, commented:

“The commencement of site preparation at Lander West represents an important milestone in the advancement of the Selta Project as we prepare for our maiden Phase I RC drilling programme.

Over recent months we have systematically advanced Lander West through geological interpretation, geophysical surveying, geochemical sampling, permitting and drill targeting. With our field team now on site and the drill rig expected to arrive on site in the coming days, we are entering an exciting new phase for the Company.

We now look forward to commencing our maiden drilling programme at Lander West and testing the high-priority gold targets identified through our systematic exploration programme.”

SITE PREPARATION COMMENCES

The Company’s field team, led by recently appointed Exploration Manager Dr David Rawlings, has commenced final site preparation activities (Figure 1), including construction of access tracks, establishment of drill pads and additional geological reconnaissance designed to optimise the initial drilling programme. Dr Rawlings will oversee the execution of the Company’s maiden Phase I RC drilling programme at Lander West, working alongside the Company’s operational team throughout the campaign.

These activities are being undertaken ahead of the planned arrival of the RC drill rig.

The Company expects GeoDrill Australia’s drill rig to arrive at Lander West in the coming days. Drilling is expected to commence following completion of rig mobilisation and final site preparations.

Figure 1: Site preparation activities underway at the Lander West Gold Target ahead of the Company’s maiden Phase I RC drilling programme.

PHASE I RC DRILLING PROGRAMME

The Phase I RC drilling programme will test a series of high-priority gold targets generated through the Company’s integrated geological, geochemical and geophysical exploration programme.

The programme represents the first drill test of several compelling gold targets identified along the prospective Stafford Gold Trend.

The upcoming programme is the culmination of many months of systematic exploration, technical evaluation, permitting and target generation and represents a significant milestone in the advancement of the Company’s flagship Selta Project.

The commencement of site preparation marks the transition from project planning to execution as the Company prepares to undertake its maiden drilling campaign at Lander West.

The Company looks forward to providing shareholders with further updates as mobilisation progresses and drilling commences.

For further information visit www.firstdevelopmentresources.com or contact the following:

First Development Resources plc

Tristan Pottas (CEO)

Tel: +44 (0) 20 3778 1397

Beaumont Cornish Limited

Nominated Adviser

Roland Cornish / Asia Szusciak

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7628 3396

SI Capital Limited

Broker

Nick Emerson

Tel: +44 (0) 1483 413 500

Zeus Capital – Azteca refurbishment on schedule

A good update today from Cadence getting things ready at the plant with Cadence now just waiting for the delivery of the operating license. With Azteca being a brownfield restart which will further process pre-processed material we see no issue with the delivery of the license, and we full expect Azteca to begin ramping up strongly in H2 2026.

Link here to view the full announcement

#GRX GreenX Metals LTD – Study Finds Tannenberg Consistent with Polish Mine

HIGHLIGHTS

·    Tannenberg mineralisation consistent with producing Polish Kupferschiefer copper-silver mines. Review by independent metallurgist from MSA Mining Consulting UK confirms potential suitability for a conventional flotation-based processing route, as used at KGHM’s (WSE:KGH) long-running operations and planned for Lumina Metals’ (TSE: LMCU) Nowa Sól project

·    Established Kupferschiefer flowsheet provides baseline processing route for Tannenberg. KGHM’s operations process 30 Mtpa at 1.6% Cu and 45 g/t Ag, achieving 89% copper and 86% silver aggregate recovery from a blended feed of Kupferschiefer shale, sandstone and carbonate-hosted mineralisation using crushing, two-stage grinding, rougher flotation, fine regrinding and multi-stage cleaning

·    Modern processing technologies offer potential to enhance recoveries. Advances, including high-pressure grinding rolls (HPGR), fine-particle flotation systems and advanced reagent schemes, will be investigated, with potential to improve liberation and recovery of fine-grained copper sulphides relative to legacy flowsheets developed decades ago for KGHM

·    Mineralogy study completed by SGS Lakefield on ten drill core samples. This study shows that the copper is predominantly hosted in chalcocite with additional bornite, chalcopyrite and covellite, typical of Kupferschiefer deposits

·    Bi-modal copper sulphide grain size distribution identified, with both coarse (>25-30 µm) and very fine disseminated material (<5-10 µm), informing comminution and flotation circuit design

·    Historical extraction at the Tannenberg Project materially de-risks metallurgy. The Tannenberg mines produced 416,500 tonnes of copper and 33.7 Moz of silver predominantly during the 1930’s – 50’s, when mineral processing technology was not as advanced as it is in modern times 

·    Supports progression to scoping-level metallurgical testwork on representative samples of each lithology to seek to confirm initial mineralogical findings, assess comminution characteristics and evaluate flotation performance

 

GreenX Metals Limited (ASX:GRX, LSE:GRX, GPW:GRX, Germany-FSE:A3C9JR) (GreenX or the Company) is pleased to announce that it has completed an early-stage mineralogy and processing study for its Tannenberg Copper Project (Tannenberg or the Project) in Germany. The mineralogy study was completed by SGS Canada Inc. at its Lakefield Ontario facility (SGS Lakefield). It was followed by an independent metallurgical review undertaken by MSA Mining Consulting UK Ltd (MSA-UK) through Principal Associate Metallurgist, Mr Gordon Cunningham. The review has benchmarked Tannenberg against operating and development Kupferschiefer mines in Poland, confirming that copper mineralisation at Tannenberg is consistent with copper-silver deposits in the region and is considered amenable to conventional flotation-based processing methods.

 

GreenX’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr Ben Stoikovich, commented: “This mineralogy study confirms that the copper is contained in the same size and style of minerals as the producing Polish Kupferschiefer mines. This independent review supports a potential conventional flotation processing route, which reduces technical risk at this early stage. This gives us confidence that Tannenberg appears to have the right ingredients to follow a proven development pathway, and we will advance metallurgical test work to unlock that potential.”

 

TYPICAL PROCESSING METHODS – KUPFERSCHIEFER OPERATIONS (KGHM AND LUMINA METALS ANALOGUES)

The sediment-hosted (Kupferschiefer) copper-silver deposits in Poland provide a well-established processing analogue for GreenX’s Tannenberg Project, with both long-running operations at KGHM and a recent Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for Lumina Metals’ Nowa Sól Project applying similar flotation-based processing routes with selective regrinding.

At KGHM’s operations, approximately 30 Mtpa of ore is treated from the Kupferschiefer sequence at an average feed grade of around 1.6% copper and 45 g/t silver. The plant processes a blended feed comprising Kupferschiefer shale, sandstone and carbonate-hosted mineralisation. Processing is based on a conventional sulphide flotation flowsheet, starting with crushing followed by two-stage grinding (rod-ball or ball-ball milling) to a primary grind size of approximately 75 µm (Source: KGHM, Micon, 2013 (see Appendix 2)).

Following grinding, the slurry is treated through flotation circuits consisting of two stages of rougher flotation. The rougher concentrate is then reground to a much finer size, typically less than 20 µm, before passing through multi-stage cleaning circuits. This combination of initial grinding and subsequent fine regrinding is critical to liberate the fine-grained copper sulphide minerals characteristic of Kupferschiefer deposits. The process produces a copper concentrate grading approximately 23% Cu and containing significant silver, with typical metallurgical performance of around 89% copper recovery and 86% silver recovery. The final concentrate is then transported to smelting and refining facilities, where copper metal is produced and silver and other by-products are recovered.

The PEA stage Nowa Sól Cu-Ag Project, owned by Lumina Metals and located within the same Kupferschiefer belt as both Tannenberg and the KGHM mines, provides a modern comparison and follows a similar processing philosophy (Source: Lumina Metals, Micon, 2026 (see Appendix 2)). The proposed flowsheet incorporates semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) with ball milling and pebble crushing, targeting a primary grind size of approximately 60 µm, followed by flotation processing. As with KGHM, the flotation circuit includes two stages of rougher flotation, with the rougher concentrate subjected to fine regrinding (to approximately 11 µm) and multiple cleaning stages to improve concentrate grade and recovery.

The Nowa Sól flowsheet is designed to produce a copper concentrate grading greater than 26% Cu, with strong silver credits (in excess of 1,200 g/t Ag), and expected recoveries of more than 88% for copper and approximately 86% for silver. The final concentrate is planned to be thickened and filtered prior to sale.

Together, these operating and development analogues demonstrate that Kupferschiefer mineralisation can be successfully processed using conventional flotation circuits that incorporate fine grinding, concentrate regrinding and multi-stage cleaning. They also highlight the importance of achieving sufficient liberation of fine-grained copper minerals, a key factor in maximising recovery and concentrate quality in this style of deposit. In the cases of both KGHM and Lumina, there remains a strong opportunity to refine and optimise the flowsheets. In KGHM’s case, the plant was built many decades ago, and the Lumina flowsheet used a limited amount of sample material.

COMPARISON OF TANNENBERG COPPER-SILVER MINERALISATION WITH POLISH ANALOGUES

The new mineralogical work was completed by SGS Lakefield on ten selected historical drill core samples distributed throughout the mineralised area (Figure 1). The analysis covered three types of mineralisation, including shale, sandstone and carbonate (Figure 2) and provided confirmation of the deportment of the Tannenberg mineralisation, allowing for an important comparison to the Polish deposits. The study utilised TESCAN Integrated Mineral Analyzer (TIMA) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) techniques to characterise mineral composition, grain size and liberation behaviour.

The results indicate that copper mineralisation is dominated by chalcocite, with additional contributions from bornite, chalcopyrite and covellite, together with minor pyrite, galena and sphalerite. Copper occurs across Kupferschiefer shale, sandstone and carbonate lithologies, with the shale generally hosting the highest grades.

Figure 1: Map showing location of drill holes, indicating those used in the mineralogy study.

A key outcome of the study is the identification of a distinctly bi-modal grain size distribution of copper sulphides, with both coarse particles (>25-30 µm) and very fine disseminated material (<5-10 µm) present within the host rocks. This fine-grained component is pervasive, with all analysed sections containing copper mineralisation below 5 µm. The presence of this bi-modal distribution is considered a critical factor influencing comminution requirements, flotation performance and overall metallurgical recovery.

When compared to Polish Kupferschiefer operations and development projects, the Tannenberg mineralisation shows strong similarities in grain-size distribution. The presence of fine and disseminated sulphide mineralisation is consistent with observations from these analogue deposits, where fine grinding and regrinding are required to achieve adequate liberation.

Hole:

Ro 45

268.34 m

Kupferschiefer

269.00 m

Kupferschiefer

269.63 m

Footwall Grauligend

Hole:

Ro 25

533.38 m

Kupferschiefer

533.89 m

 Kupferschiefer

Hole:

Ro 15

286.24 m

Hanging wall Limestone

287.00 m

Hanging wall Limestone

288.20 m

Hanging wall Limestone

 

Hole:

Ro 38

536.66 m

Kupferschiefer

539.00 m

Footwall Grauligend

Figure 2: Copper sulphide gangue mineral association images for the ten samples which formed part of the study. The width of each image is 1.5mm.

Based on these similarities, conventional flotation processing is considered an appropriate baseline metallurgical approach for Tannenberg. The Polish analogues demonstrate that crushing, primary grinding, flotation, concentrate regrinding and multi-stage cleaning can achieve strong recoveries of copper and silver from Kupferschiefer ores. As with all such operations, the bi-modal grain size distribution identified at Tannenberg suggests that particular attention will need to be given to comminution strategy, including the potential requirement for finer grinding to effectively liberate ultra-fine copper minerals.

The mineralogical data also indicates the presence of organic carbon and minor deleterious elements, which may report to concentrate and influence product quality. As a result, future metallurgical testwork will evaluate additional processing steps, such as carbon pre-flotation or specialised reagent schemes, to optimise concentrate grade and marketability.

The Competent Person and independent metallurgical consultant, Mr Cunningham from MSA-UK, has concluded that the Tannenberg mineralisation is materially similar to Polish analogue ores. The Competent Person considers that the Tannenberg mineralisation is potentially well suited to a flotation-based processing flowsheet and that, subject to further test work, metallurgical recoveries are comparable to, or potentially better than the ~89% Cu and ~86% Ag recoveries reported from Polish mines may be achievable at Tannenberg. The Competent Person also considers that the Project may potentially produce a copper-silver concentrate of a type that could have strong market acceptance. The Competent Person has concluded, with reasonable confidence, that the following material factors support this assessment, subject to further test work:

·      This new mineralogy study includes TIMA and SEM analysis conducted on 10 samples from four drill holes, which are considered representative of the Tannenberg mineralisation. The selected drill holes provide good spatial coverage of the target mineralisation, as shown in Figure 1.

·      The Tannenberg mineralisation is interpreted to have formed through the same genetic process as the Polish analogue ores, with all projects existing on the same structure and mineral system, the Mid-European Crystalline Zone (please refer to GreenX’s announcement dated 9 September 2025).

·      Copper and silver ore-mineral grain size, host mineral associations and other deportment characteristics at Tannenberg have been found to be materially similar to the published data from the Polish analogue ores. These fundamental technical characteristics are key to determining metallurgical recovery.

·      Both copper and silver were historically extracted at the Tannenberg Project through mining activities undertaken up to the 1950’s.

·      The metallurgical recoveries referenced above are consistent with the 2013 Technical Report prepared by Micron International Limited, an independent consultant to KGHM (Refer to Appendix 2).

·      Modern developments in copper processing technologies may provide opportunities to improve overall metallurgical recoveries relative to the KGHM mines, which were constructed in the 1960s.

This initial mineralogical assessment at Tannenberg also highlights the importance of detailed metallurgical testwork to optimise grind size, concentrate quality and recovery for the Project. The shallow depth of the Tannenberg Project, with the existence of spoil heaps and potentially accessible old workings will facilitate metallurgical test work being conducted during early project study phases.

 

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN COPPER PROCESSING TECHNOLOGIES

While Kupferschiefer deposits in Poland have been processed for decades using conventional flotation circuits, more recent technological developments offer opportunities to enhance metallurgical performance.

Advances in comminution technologies, such as HPGR, can improve the liberation of fine-grained copper minerals by breaking ore along natural grain boundaries. This is particularly important for Kupferschiefer mineralisation, where a significant portion of copper occurs in very fine particles.

In addition, modern flotation technologies and specialised fine-particle recovery systems can improve recovery of ultra-fine sulphide minerals, while advanced reagent schemes and pre-treatment steps, such as carbon pre-flotation, may further enhance concentrate grade.

These developments indicate that modern flowsheets have the potential to achieve improved copper and silver recoveries compared to historic operations, particularly for fine-grained Kupferschiefer ores.

Upcoming Work Programs

In addition to the ongoing exploration activities, GreenX will advance the next stage of processing work and focus on scoping-level metallurgical test work using representative samples collected from the key mineralised lithologies. This program will be designed to confirm the initial mineralogical findings, assess comminution characteristics and evaluate flotation performance, including recovery, concentrate grade and reagent selection.

Results from this test work will be used to develop a preliminary metallurgical flowsheet for the Tannenberg Project. This flowsheet will provide the basis for subsequent, more advanced metallurgical programs, including variability testing, optimisation of grind size and flotation conditions, and detailed assessment of concentrate quality and processing performance.

 

ENQUIRIES

 

Ben Stoikovich

Chief Executive Officer

Kazimierz Chojna

Investor Relations – Poland

 

+44 207 478 3900

ir@greenxmetals.com

Kim Eckhof

Investor Relations – UK/Germany

 

 

Competent Persons Statement (Exploration Results)

The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Dr Matthew Jackson, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Dr Jackson is a Technical Consultant for GreenX and is a holder of unlisted options in the Company. Dr Jackson has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Dr Jackson consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

Competent Persons Statement (metallurgy MINERALOGY STUDY)

The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results (metallurgy mineralogy study) is based on information compiled by Mr Gordon Cunningham, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Engineering Council of South Africa and a Fellow of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, a Recognised Professional Organisation included in a list promulgated by ASX from time to time. Mr Cunningham is a Technical Consultant for MSA Mining Consulting UK Ltd. Mr Cunningham has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Cunningham consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

Forward Looking Statements

This release may include forward-looking statements, which may be identified by words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, “plans”, and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on GreenX’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of GreenX, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. GreenX makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.

The information contained within this announcement is deemed to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Regulation 2014/596/EU which is part of domestic law pursuant to the Market Abuse (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations (SI 2019/310) (“UK MAR”). By the publication of this announcement via a Regulatory Information Service, this inside information (as defined in UK MAR) is now considered to be in the public domain.

REFERENCES AND SOURCES

Please refer to Appendix 2 below.

Appendix 1: Exploration Results and JORC Tables

Table 1: Historical drill hole information (used for process mineralogy study)

Hole ID

Easting

Northing

Elevation

(m MSL)

Dip (°)

Depth (m)

Ro 15

4348595

5647200

255

90

351

Ro 25

4349554

5646656

331

90

553

Ro 38

4351640

5647472

249

90

559

Ro 45

4356946

5656716

407

90

289

Note: Coordinates are DHDN / 3-degree Gauss-Kruger zone 4.

 

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 Report

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Sampling techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.

1980’s Drilling Campaign

All 1980’s analyses reported in this announcement were from diamond drill core. The core for the holes was 47 mm diameter in all cases, except Ro 17 and Ro 15 where core was 60 mm in diameter. Due to the historic nature of the drilling results reported herein, it is not possible to comment on the quality of the drilling used to produce the results described.

Sampling of ¼ core was conducted during multiple exploration phases between 1980 and 1987 within the licence area by St Joe.

The 1980’s information was collated from original hard copy reports from that era and a State Survey Database. Assays, geological logging and gamma ray logs were conducted by St Joe Explorations and Mansfeld AG. No other information is available for the exploration drilling.

2025 Logging and Resampling Program

The core used for the program had been sampled to varying degrees during the 40 years in storage. Sampling restrictions were placed on the program by the owners. As such, two sampling protocols were used: ¼ core sampling and sliver sampling.

Where ¼ core sampling was employed, the program used industry standard methods to take 25% of the core which was originally extracted from the hole.

Sliver sampling was employed where only 25% of the core was available in order to leave core in the box to maintain the archive correctly. In this case 20% of the remaining 25% was sampled using a specialist saw. Where this resulted in low sample mass, the interval lengths were increased in order to maintain suitable representivity.

For the intervals from most holes (Ro 38, Ro 17, Ro 25 and Ro 45), ¼ core was sampled for the majority of the samples and sliver sampling for the remaining narrow intervals.

For the hole Ro 23, 79% of the sampling was conducted using the sliver method and the remaining using ¼ core.

For the intervals from Ro 15 only sliver sampling was used.

A handheld XRF was used to assist with confirming the representivity of the sliver sampling and determining sample.

 

Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.

1980’s Drilling Campaign

No details covering the representivity of the samples for 1980’s assays were reported by the authors.

2025 Logging and Resampling Program

Due to the extremely fine-grained mineralisation and matrix of Kupferschiefer Mineralisation (eg Rahfeld, 2018), the heterogeneity of the sampled materials is known to be extremely low. By comparison with other deposits, fundamental sampling error (FSE) is likely to be between 2-5% coefficient of variation (Absalov, 2011). This means that the introduction of error from sub-sampling of the core and samples will be negligible and very low sample sizes are suitable for assessing grade.

In order to further validate the low FSE, in the sliver samples. pXRF measurements were made at spacings of 5-10cm where sliver samples were taken. The results of the pXRF measurements confirmed that a very low error was found and that the use of sliver samples is suitable for assessing grade.

A handheld XRF was used only for validation of sliver samples and assisting with selection of sample intervals. The Olympus Vanta (V2MR) configured with the GeoChem(3) calibration. A reading time of 40 seconds was used. A blank standard or CRM was analysed daily before the start of work. Procedures were in place to ensure correct operation.

 

Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

2025 Logging and Resampling Program

Sampling ¼ core followed industry standard procedures. The same side of the core was sampled throughout each hole. The samples were cut using an automated saw designed for core cutting in order to eliminate any sample loss.

The use of sliver sampling is uncommon in many deposits, although known to be used in some sedimentary hosted copper deposits similar to the Kupferschiefer. Due to the extremely fine-grained mineralisation and matrix of Kupferschiefer Mineralisation (eg Rahfeld, 2018), the heterogeneity of the sampled materials is known to be extremely low. By comparison with other deposits, FSE is likely to be between 2-5% coefficient of variation (Absalov, 2011). This means that the introduction of error from sub-sampling of the core and samples will be negligible and very low sample sizes are suitable.

Drilling techniques

Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).

1980’s Drilling Campaign

The samples were all taken from core and the core for the holes was 47 mm diameter in all cases, except Ro 17 and Ro 15 where core was 60 mm in diameter. No other details of the drilling are available.

Drill sample recovery

Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.

 

Core recoveries for the relevant intercepts are as follows:

·          Ro 15       96%

·          Ro 25       100%

·          Ro 38       100%

·          Ro 45       100%

The recoveries reported here are measured from the core available for sampling in 2025.

 

Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.

Not known.

 

Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

It is believed that low core recoveries in some cases may have been caused by researchers removing small sections of the core that contained elevated copper. For that reason, a core recovery limit of 90% was used to select which holes to report.

Due to the same possibility of past researchers removing copper enriched parts, it is possible that the intervals announced here may under-report copper. The addition of the 90% core recovery selection criteria has limited that effect.

Logging

Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.

Geological and geotechnical logging has been completed according to industry best practice and would be suitable to support Mineral Resource Estimation. Note that JORC Mineral Resources not reported in this announcement.

 

Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.

Geological and geotechnical logging is qualitative. Wet and dry core photos have been taken.

 

The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.

1980’s Drilling Campaign

The entire hole was logged, the target zone is typically 2 m thick.

2025 Logging and Resampling Program

All available core was logged. The amount of available core always included the mineralised T1 stratigraphic horizon and was a minimum of 10m above and below that unit. In most cases at least 90m of core was logged and some cases the entire hole.

Sub-sampling techniques

If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.

1980’s Drilling Campaign

Samples were sawn using ¼ core.

2025 Logging and Resampling Program

Where ¼ core was sampled, industry standard sampling methods were used.

Where sliver samples were taken, a small rock saw was used to take 20% of the ¼ core that was available.

In all cases the same side of the core was sampled from top to bottom.

2026 Process Mineralogy Study

A sub sample of coarse rejects (2mm) was taken using a Jones Type Riffle splitter at SGS Ankara.

a

If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.

N/A

 

For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.

1980’s Drilling Campaign

Methods unknown.

2025 Logging and Resampling Program

Industry standard and accredited techniques were used in all cases. Samples were weighed, then crushed in a jaw crusher to 75% passing 2 mm. The crushed sample was then split using a rotary splitter to 250 g. The sub sample was then pulverised to 85% passing a 75 µm.

All procedures were accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 standard.

 

Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.

1980’s Drilling Campaign

Methods unknown.

2025 Logging and Resampling Program

Screen tests were performed and reported for both crushing and pulverising stages. The results showed that comminution met and exceeded the standards above.

2026 Process Mineralogy Study

The results of screen tests demonstrate that sub sampling for process mineralogy was appropriate and no bias has been introduced.

 

Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.

1980’s Drilling Campaign

Methods unknown.

2025 Logging and Resampling Program

Industry standard quality control methods were used. GRX used coarse and pulp duplicates were inserted at a frequency of 1/50 each. Field duplicates were not used due to restrictions on the proportion of core available for sampling.

The maximum error between crush duplicates was found to be 2.0% and 0% for Cu and Ag respectively, which supports the view the FSE is low and that sliver sampling was representative of the mineralisation.

 

Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.

1980’s Drilling Campaign

Methods unknown, but given that ¼ core was sampled, samples are likely to meet modern industry standards.

2025 Logging and Resampling Program

For the ¼ core samples masses were between 0.19 kg and 7.89 kg. This is appropriate.

For the sliver samples, masses were between 0.1 kg and 0.84 Kg. This is appropriate given the low FSE, validation by pXRF and low error seen in coarse duplicates.

2026 Process Mineralogy Study

The stoichiometric “TIMA Calculated” assay was found to show an excellent correlation with the chemical assays, hence the sample size and splitting method used for the mineralogy study can be considered to be appropriate.

Quality of assay data and laboratory tests

The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.

1980’s Drilling Campaign

Geochemical analysis was carried out by Robertson Research Ltd, Wales, however the precise nature quality and appropriateness of the assaying is unknown. The precise nature quality and appropriateness of the assaying is unknown.

2026 Process Mineralogy Study

Industry standard and accredited procedures were used. All samples were analysed using a four-acid digestion with an Inductively Coupled Plasma – Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-AES) finish. Where analyses were found to be above detection limits, an Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) finish was used.

All procedures were accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 standard.

Although no industry accreditations are available for such mineralogy studies, the work was performed to internal standards set up by SGS Lakefield who have an excellent reputation for such work.

 

For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.

2026 Process Mineralogy Study

No geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF or similar devices were used in this study. Mineralogy data was collected using TESCAN Integrated Mineral Analyzer (TIMA) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) instruments which were calibrated according to manufacturers specifications.

 

Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.

2025 Logging and Resampling Program

Quality Control samples were added at a rate of 10%. For every 100 samples, 4 Certified Reference Materials were used, two Pulp duplicates, two crush duplicate and two blanks were inserted.

Certified reference materials were matrix matched where possible and included cut-off grade materials for copper and silver.

2026 Process Mineralogy Study

QC samples are not suitable for quality control of such work. However the stoichiometric “TIMA Calculated” assay was found to show an excellent correlation with the chemical assays, hence the sample size and splitting method used for the mineralogy study can be considered to be appropriate.

Verification of sampling and assaying

The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.

 

No significant intersections reported.

 

The use of twinned holes.

No twinned holes reported.

 

Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.

2026 Process Mineralogy Study

TIMA and SEM work was carried out separately and found to show similar grain size and mineral chemistry results.

 

Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

No adjustments made.

Location of data points

Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.

Location accuracy is unknown. The location of holes drilled by St Joe Explorations comes from collar tables in historical reports.  All other collar locations come from State/Federal databases.

 

Specification of the grid system used.

1980’s Drilling

Latitude and Longitude in degree, minutes and seconds were provided for collars by St Joe Explorations.

 

Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

Unknown

Data spacing and distribution

Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.

1980’s Drilling

Between 400 m to 700 m.

 

Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.

N/A, JORC Mineral Resources not reported.

 

Whether sample compositing has been applied.

N/A

Orientation of data in relation to geological structure

Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.

N/A

 

If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

N/A

Sample security

The measures taken to ensure sample security.

1980’s Drilling Campaign

Methods not known.

2025 Logging and Resampling Program

Full chain of custody tracking was completed for all transportation of core and samples.

Audits or reviews

The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.

No audits completed.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Mineral tenement and land tenure status

Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.

The Tannenberg 1 licence is held 100% by Group 11 Exploration GmbH (Group 11) a subsidiary of GreenX. The licences were awarded on the 6th June 2025 for three years and has now been extended for a further three years to 6 June 2028. The licence is free from overriding royalties and native titles interests. There are historical mine workings within the licence area, but no known historical sites of cultural significance outside of mining.

The Tannenberg 2 exploration licence is also held 100% by Group 11. The licence was granted effective 22 April 2025 and is valid for three years also until 6 June 2028.

Within and surrounding both licence areas, there are environmental protections zones with differing levels of protections. There are small areas identified as Natura 2000 Fauna Flora Habitat Areas and Bird Sanctuaries. Other environmental protection designated areas include Nature Reserves, National Natural Monuments, Landscape Protection Area, and Natural Parks. Based on due diligence and discussions with various stakeholders and consultants, the presence of environmental protection areas does not preclude exploration or eventual mining if conducted in accordance with applicable standards and regulations.

The landform across the license area comprises mostly of farmland, forested areas, and small towns and villages.

 

The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.

The licences are in good standing.

Exploration done by other parties

Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.

Exploration was carried out by St Joe Explorations (in JV with the Broken Hill Pty Co Ltd later BHP-Utah) between 1980 and 1987. Two projects were undertaken. The Richelsdorf project within the licence area as well as the Spessart-Rhoen project 85 km to the south. Hole IDs starting with ‘Ro’ were drilled by St Joe Explorations.

Exploration in the 1930’s was carried out by Mansfeld AG and resulted in 95 drill holes which were used to establish 3 mines in the area, with recommendations for the opening of a further 2 which never materialised.

Historical mining took place within the licence area. Mining activities ceased in the 1950’s.

Geology

Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.

Mineralisation is of the classic Kupferschiefer type (copper slate) within the Permian Zechstein Basin of Germany and Poland.

The Zechstein Basin is hosted within the Southern Permian Basin (“SPB”) of Europe. The SPB is an intracontinental basin that developed on the northern foreland of the Variscan Orogen.

Very high-grade copper mineralisation is generally associated with the Kupferschiefer shale unit. However, minable copper mineralisation also occurs in the footwall sandstone and hanging wall limestone units in Poland. Mineralisation can be offset from the shale by up to 30 m above and 60 m below.

Drill hole Information

A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:

easting and northing of the drill hole collar

elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar

dip and azimuth of the hole

down hole length and interception depth

hole length.

All drill hole collar information has been provided in Table 1 of Appendix 1.

 

If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.

All drill hole collar information has been provided in Table 1 of Appendix 1.

Data aggregation methods

In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.

Industry standard methods used. No cut-off grade or high cut was applied.

 

Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.

Industry standard methods used. No cut-off grade or high cut was applied.

 

The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.

No metal equivalents reported.

Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths

These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.

N/A

 

If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’).

N/A

Diagrams

Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.

Relevant maps provided in announcement dated 20 November 2025 and also in Figure 1 above.

Balanced reporting

Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.

All relevant and material results have been reported.

Other substantive exploration data

Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.

All substantive results are reported. Geological logs and downhole gamma logs are not reported here.

Further work

The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).

Provided on page 6 of this announcement.

 

 

Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

N/A

 

APPENDIX 2: Company Specific Sources

Project

Company

Status

Source Data

Link

Legnica-Glogów Copper Belt

KGHM Polska Miedź S.A.

Producing

NI 43-101 Technical Report

(Feb-2013)

“Technical Report on the Copper-Silver Production Operations of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. in the Legnica-Głogów Copper Belt Area of Southwestern Poland” prepared by Micon International Limited. | KGHM Corporate website

https://kghm.com/sites/default/files/document-attachments/kghm_technical_report_micon.pdf

Nowa Sól Copper Silver Project

Lumina Metals Corp

Development

NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment

(8-April-2026)

https://www.sedarplus.ca/csa-party/records/document.html?id=b0847fbf8b3630beaed0a3a5b5dc64d34aedff47b436cd2c95d4d35ed37e8235

#FCM First Class Metals PLC – FCM Secures 100% of Kerrs Gold, Issue of Equity & Total Voting Rights

First Class Metals PLC (“First Class Metals”, “FCM” or the “Company”) the UK listed company focused on the discovery of economic metal deposits across its exploration properties in Ontario, Canada, is pleased to announce that it has completed the final cash payment under the Kerrs Gold Property option agreement and has now secured 100% ownership of the Kerrs Gold Project in northeastern Ontario.

Importantly, the Company has accelerated completion of the acquisition significantly ahead of the original staged earn-in schedule announced on 22 April 2024.

Highlights

• FCM now owns 100% of the Kerrs Gold Project.

 

• All option obligations completed materially ahead of the original three-year schedule.

 

• The claims are in the process of being transferred to First Class Metals Canada Inc.

 

• Acceleration reflects the Company’s confidence in the strategic value of the asset and its broader portfolio positioning initiatives.

 

• Kerrs hosts a historic NI 43-101 inferred gold resource estimate of 386,467 ounces grading 1.71 g/t Au.

 

• Full ownership provides maximum strategic and corporate flexibility as FCM advances initiatives focused on unlocking shareholder value.

 

The Kerrs Gold Project is situated within the highly prolific Timmins Mining Camp in Ontario, Canada, one of the world’s premier gold producing regions, surrounded by major mining operations including Newmont’s Hoyle Pond and Hollinger mines and McEwen Mining’s Black Fox Complex.

By accelerating the acquisition timetable, FCM has consolidated outright ownership of a significant gold asset within a Tier-1 mining jurisdiction at a time when the Company continues to evaluate multiple avenues to maximise value across its Ontario project portfolio.

 

James Knowles, Executive Chairman of First Class Metals, commented:

“We believe outright ownership of quality projects in established mining jurisdictions, particularly those with defined gold inventory and resource expansion potential, will become increasingly important as new models for recognising and financing resource-backed gold assets continue to emerge.”

 

Further Information on the Kerrs Gold Project

The Kerrs Gold Project comprises 36 units covering approximately 665 hectares located approximately 90 kilometres east-northeast of Timmins, Ontario within the Abitibi Greenstone Belt.

 

The Project hosts a historic inferred resource estimate, prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 by Kirkham Geosystems Ltd. in 2011, of:

 

7,041,460 tonnes grading 1.71 g/t Au for 386,467 ounces of gold at a 0.5 g/t cut-off grade, using a gold price significantly below the current price.

 

First Class Metals PLC (“First Class Metals”, “FCM” or the “Company”) the UK listed company focused on the discovery of economic metal deposits across its exploration properties in Ontario, Canada, announces it has received a conversion notice in respect of a portion of the Notes* issued pursuant to the Convertible Loan Note instrument announced on 30 January 2026 as detailed below.

Following this conversion, £75,000 debt remains to be converted under the Convertible Loan Note instrument announced on 30 January 2026.

Notes to be converted: * & ** 325,000
Value of Notes to be converted: £325,000
Date of conversion: 27/05/2026
Number of Ordinary shares to be issued to satisfy the conversion 18,771,501

* Notes = 325,000 £1.00 interest-free convertible loan notes

** Using the conversion formula set out in the 30 Jan 2026 announcement

Application will be made to the London Stock Exchange for the 18,771,501 new Ordinary shares to be admitted to trading on the Main Market for listed securities (“Admission”) and it is expected that such Admission will take place at 8.00 a.m. on or around on 4th June 2026.

In accordance with the provision of the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority, the Company confirms that, following the issue of the above new Ordinary shares, its issued ordinary share capital will comprise 386,720,973 Ordinary Shares. All the Ordinary Shares have equal voting rights and none of the Ordinary Shares are held in Treasury. The total number of voting rights in the Company will therefore be 386,720,973. The above figure may be used by shareholders as the denominator for the calculations to determine if they are required to notify their interests in, or a change to their interest in, the Company.

For further information, please contact:

James Knowles, Executive Chair
Email: JamesK@Firstclassmetalsplc.com
Tel: 07488 362641

Marc J Sale, CEO
Email: MarcS@Firstclassmetalsplc.com
Tel: 07711 093532

AlbR Capital Limited

David Coffman / Dan Harris

Website: www.albrcapital.com
Tel: (0)20 7469 0930

Axis Capital Markets (Broker)
Richard Hutchinson

Website: Axcap247.com
Tel: (0)203 026 0449

#AYM Anglesey Mining PLC – Operational Update and Appointment of CEO

Anglesey Mining plc (AIM: AYM), the UK-based mineral exploration and development company and the 100% owner of the Parys Mountain Cu-Zn-Pb-Ag-Au VMS project in Anglesey, North Wales, is pleased to announce an operational update.

Highlights:

  • Appointment of Andrew Fulton, a Chartered Mining Engineer (C.Eng, FIMMM), as CEO
  • Commencement of preliminary geo-spatial analysis
  • Initial phase of the drone-operated aero-geophysics (aero-magnetics) programme completed
  • Pivotal six-month period: Board reorganisation, injection of capital and significantly reduced debt

 

CEO Appointment

Following today’s earlier announcement, Andrew Fulton, a Chartered Mining Engineer (C.Eng, FIMMM) with more than 30 years of global experience in developing and managing mineral projects, has joined the Board as CEO. He will focus on team formation and leadership, aligning technical, operational, and commercial capabilities with a strategic emphasis on due diligence, turnaround, and growth.

Geo-Spatial Analysis

Anglesey is pleased to announce the engagement of Satellite Applications Catapult of Harwell, Oxfordshire, UK (“Catapult”), to provide a preliminary geo-spatial analysis as an exploration method with a view to delineating Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide (“VMS”) extensions in and around the Company’s Parys Mountain site. This work, which involves a non-intrusive exploration method, utilises an orbiting satellite to relay images to Catapult, from where sub-surface images are analysed. The method, albeit semi-qualitative and semi-quantitative, can delineate surface targets for follow-up ground exploration. This work is currently ongoing and is estimated to be completed within eight weeks.

Completion of Aero-Geophysical Survey

The Company is also pleased to report that the initial phase of the Company’s drone-operated aero-geophysics (aero-magnetics) programme, undertaken by JBUAS, has been completed. The initial results strongly suggest VMS extensions along the flight paths; these are very encouraging. Although the results are semi-quantitative and semi-qualitative, the detected anomalies are not dissimilar to those associated with known polymetallic mineralisation at Parys Mountain. Catapult will incorporate the aero-magnetic images into their work, which is expected to produce a more comprehensive conclusion.

Both the geo-spatial programme and aero-magnetics represent cost-effective exploratory tools that allow the Company to focus on ground-based exploration.

Key Recent Milestones

Anglesey would also like to remind shareholders of key corporate achievements since December last year, a period which has had a profound and positive impact on the direction of the Company:

  • On the 11 th December 2025, Anglesey’s largest shareholder, Energold Minerals Inc. (24.4%), invested a further £350,000 via a warrant exercised priced (post-consolidation) at 7.6 pence.
  • On the 25 th February 2026, the Company reported that £4,000,000 of debt had been eliminated in return for the Company’s holdings in both `LIM’ and Grangesberg, allowing the Board to focus on its one remaining key asset, the 100% owned Parys Mountain project.
  • On the 9 th March 2026, the Company raised gross funds of £680,000 at 6 pence per share with a one-for-one warrant priced at 7 pence and valid until 2 nd March 2027.
  • On the 6 th May 2026, the Company announced pertinent Board changes to strategically pivot and progress the Company.

 

The Company has only c.£100,000 debt remaining, post its capital restructuring and has a clear mandate to further explore and advance its Parys Mountain asset.

 

Jim Williams, Executive Chairman of Anglesey, commented:

 We are pleased to present an operational update following the earlier news regarding our new CEO. Parys Mountain represents a significant copper deposit, along with other base and precious metals. With copper demand forecast to increase, there is no better time to work in parallel to expand the resource base and advance the development initiative to build a mine at Parys Mountain. The upside potential to increase the resources at Parys Mountain is self-evident, and the down-dip extension of, for example, the Northern Copper Zone, is significant when an analysis of typical VMS deposits is considered.

 

“We are essentially debt-free for the first time in a very long time, and maximum emphasis will now be placed on disseminating pertinent news out promptly to bring Anglesey to the forefront of the local and investor community. To support, we have appointed a Financial & Media Relations agency, well-known within the sector.”

 

Appointment of CEO

Anglesey Mining plc (AIM: AYM), the UK-based mineral exploration and development company and the 100% owner of the Parys Mountain Cu-Zn-Pb-Ag-Au VMS project in Anglesey, North Wales, is pleased to announce the appointment of Andrew Fulton to the Board as Chief Executive Officer, with effect from 1 June 2026.   Andrew’s appointment follows the 6 May 2026 announcement that Rob Marsden will step down from the Board at the end of this month.

Andrew is a Chartered Mining Engineer and a Fellow of the Institute of Minerals, Mining & Materials (C.Eng, FIMMM) with more than 30 years’ global experience in developing and managing mineral projects across the UK, Europe, Africa, the Middle East and Asia. He will focus on team formation and leadership, aligning technical, operational, and commercial capabilities with a strategic emphasis on due diligence, turnaround, and growth.

Andrew, whose expertise is often sought when assets require clarity, pace, and leadership to unlock value, has served as co-director of Capacity Minerals Limited, a mineral asset development company with interests in Egypt and Jordan, since 2025.

He has also been the founder and principal director of Gatesbridge Limited since 2013, a company dedicated to solving complex mining challenges with clarity, credibility and connection.

His previous roles include starting as an Operations Manager at ICL’s Boulby Polyhalite Mine in the North-East of England, where he later became Vice President; serving as a Director of Deep Mining at UK Coal Plc; and working for Anglo American for 15 years in a leadership role, including as Regional General Manager.

Andrew’s dedication to the mining industry is evidenced by his tenure as Past President of the Mining Association of the United Kingdom.

Andrew’s LinkedIn profile can be viewed here: Andrew Fulton | LinkedIn

Jim Williams, Executive Chairman of Anglesey, commented:

“I would like to take this opportunity to reiterate the Company’s thanks to Rob for his service and wish him all the very best. On behalf of Anglesey, I am delighted to welcome Andrew as our new CEO, who will lead the exploration and development of our 100% owned Parys Mountain asset. Andrew brings demonstrable experience as a mining engineer, a strategist and an accomplished executive operator.”

CEO, Andrew Fulton, commented:

 I am delighted to become CEO of Anglesey. I see the potential to unlock value from the Parys Mountain asset and believe this underdeveloped project has significant upside potential. I look forward to working with all stakeholders to enhance the Company’s growth story.”

Andrew Fulton, aged 53, holds or has held the following directorships/partnerships in the past five years:

Current Directorships/Partnerships Former Directorships/Partnerships (past five years)
Capacity Minerals Cleveland Potash Ltd
Gatesbridge Limited
Mining Association of the UK
Minerals Products Qualifications Council

 

Andrew currently holds no direct interests in the Company’s ordinary shares.

 

Andrew was a director of UK Coal Mine Holdings Ltd and UK Coal Operations Ltd, which entered into administration on 9 July 2013 and were dissolved on 4 August 2018.

 

Qualified Person

Eur. Ing. Jim Williams, BSc, MSc, D.I.C., FIMMM, CEng., CGeol., the Executive Chairman of Anglesey Mining,   a “Competent Person” as defined in the AIM guidelines of the London Stock Exchange, and a “Qualified Person” as defined in the Canadian National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”), has reviewed and approved the information in this release.

 

For further information, please visit the Company’s website: www.angleseymining.co.uk

 

-Ends-

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Anglesey Mining plc (via Yellow Jersey PR Limited)

Jim Williams, Executive Chairman

angleseymining@yellowjerseypr.com

 

Davy

Nominated Adviser & Joint Corporate Broker

Brian Garrahy/Daragh O’Reilly

Tel: +353 1 679 6363

 

AlbR Capital Limited

Joint Corporate Broker

Lucy Williams/Duncan Vasey

Tel: +44 (0)20 7562 0930

 

Yellow Jersey PR Limited

Financial & Media Relations

Dominic Barretto/Shivantha Thambirajah

Tel: +44 (0)20 3004 9512

 

About Anglesey Mining plc:

Anglesey is advancing the UK’s largest copper project at the 100% owned Parys Mountain Cu-Zn-Pb-Ag-Au VMS deposit in North Wales.

#FDR First Development Resources PLC – Update on Selta Project

First Development Resources plc (AIM: FDR), the UK-based, Australia-focused exploration company, is pleased to announce that it has received formal Notice of Authority to Commence Mining Activities at the Lander West gold target, part of its 100%-owned Selta Project in the Northern Territory, Australia.

The notice has been issued by the Northern Territory Government following the Company’s successful application for an Environmental (Mining) Licence (“EML”) (Exploration Licence No: EL32755), and the lodgement and acceptance of the required security bond.

This approval represents a key regulatory milestone and enables the Company to proceed with the commencement of mining activities, specifically Reverse Circulation (“RC”) drilling at the Lander West gold Target in accordance with the approved environmental and operational conditions.

With all necessary approvals now secured, FDR can proceed with drilling at Lander West – a critical step in advancing the Selta Project and unlocking its gold potential. The commencement of drilling will mark the Company’s first material move into active exploration on the ground at Selta, with results expected to drive news flow and project momentum.

The Company will provide further updates as pre-mobilisation and operational activities progress.

HIGHLIGHTS

·   Notice of Authority to Commence Mining Activities received (dated April 21st 2026) from the Northern Territory Government Department of Mining and Energy

·   Environmental (Mining) Licence security bond lodged and accepted in full clears pathway for Phase I RC Drilling Programme at Lander West gold Target

·    Preparations for Phase I RC Drilling Programme underway

Tristan Pottas, Chief Executive Officer of FDR, commented:

“Receiving the formal Notice to Commence Mining at Lander West marks a significant step forward for the Company as we transition from target generation into drilling operations.

With all key regulatory approvals now in place, including the grant of our Environmental (Mining) Licence and acceptance of the security bond, we are focused on progressing towards commencing the Phase I RC Drilling Programme in the near term.

Lander West represents an important opportunity within our 100%-owned Selta Project, and we look forward to updating shareholders as we move into the next phase of development.”

For further information visit www.firstdevelopmentresources.com or contact the following:

First Development Resources plc

Tristan Pottas (CEO)

Tel: +44 (0) 20 3778 1397

ABOUT REACH ANNOUNCEMENTS

This is a Reach announcement. Reach is an investor communication service aimed at assisting listed and unlisted (including AIM quoted) companies to distribute media only / non-regulatory news releases into the public domain. Information required to be notified under the AIM Rules for Companies, Market Abuse Regulation or other regulation would be disseminated as an RNS regulatory announcement and not on Reach.

ABOUT FIRST DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES

First Development Resources’ assets comprise eight granted tenements covering a total area of 2,314.4km2. Five of the tenements, comprising three prospective copper-gold projects, are located in Western Australia (WA) while the remaining three tenements, comprising a rare-earth element (REE), uranium, lithium and gold project, are located in the Australia’s Northern Territory. All tenements are wholly owned by FDR. The assets are a mixture of drill ready and earlier stage exploration.

The WA Projects include the Company’s Wallal Project as well as Ripon Hills and Braeside West Projects situated in the Paterson Province, which is widely regarded as one of the most productive regions in Australia for the discovery of world-class gold-copper deposits, and which is home to several world-class mines and more recent discoveries.

The Selta Project in the Northern Territory is located in an area considered highly prospective for uranium and rare-earth element mineralisation along with base and precious metal mineralisation. Numerous companies are actively exploring within the region.

Beyond the existing portfolio, FDR is actively looking to expand its portfolio through the acquisition of early-stage exploration projects in Australia.

SELTA PROJECT INDICATIVE OPERATIONAL TIMELINE

Indicative operational milestones for exploration activities at the Selta Project. Schedule subject to change.

#FDR First Development Resources PLC – Selta – Environmental (Mining) Licence Granted

First Development Resources plc (AIM: FDR), the UK-based, Australia-focused exploration company with mineral interests in the Northern Territory and Western Australia, is pleased to announce that it has been granted an Environmental (Mining) Licence (“EML”) by the Northern Territory Government Department of Lands, Planning and Environment (“DLPE”).

The grant of the EML is a significant operational milestone, enabling FDR to transition from surface exploration to drilling at the high-priority Lander West Gold Target, located within the Stafford Gold Trend at the Company’s wholly owned Selta Project in Australia’s Northern Territory.

Tristan Pottas, Chief Executive Officer of FDR, commented:

“Securing the Environmental (Mining) Licence is a pivotal achievement for the Company and allows us to move immediately from target generation to drill testing at Lander West.

Following a disciplined and methodical exploration programme, we have developed a strong pipeline of priority drill targets. We are now focused on executing an RC drilling campaign later this year to test these compelling gold opportunities along the Stafford Gold Trend, where ongoing exploration by other operators continues to deliver encouraging results.

We believe this next phase has the potential to deliver significant value for shareholders.”

ENVIRONMENTAL (MINING) LICENCE APPROVAL

The grant of the EML allows the Company to undertake on-ground exploration activities under an approved DLPE Mining Management Plan and marks a clear pathway to drilling.

FDR is now advancing plans for a targeted reverse circulation (“RC”) drilling programme at the highly prospective Lander West Gold Target, with planning and preparatory work already underway.

The approved mining activities under FDR’s EML include:

·    40 RC drill holes, drill pads and sumps

·    Tracks of a maximum 3m width, totalling 13.5km

·    Total surface disturbance of 6.45 hectares

​ADVANCING TO DRILLING PHASE

FDR has completed multiple phases of systematic exploration across Lander West, including:

·    In-depth desktop geological studies

·    Aeromagnetic and radiometric surveys

·    Gradient Array Induced Polarisation (“GAIP”) survey

The integration of these datasets has refined the Company’s geological model and strengthened its understanding of structural controls on mineralisation, resulting in the definition of several priority drill targets along the prospective Stafford Gold Trend.

RC drilling represents the most decisive stage of this exploration strategy, providing direct testing for gold mineralisation.

NEXT STEPS

FDR is progressing operational planning, contractor engagement and site logistics in preparation for the planned RC drilling programme.

Following payment of the environmental security bond, the Company expects to receive formal notice to commence activities from the Northern Territory Government within approximately five business days.

Drilling is targeted to begin later this year, with the programme designed to test the most prospective zones at Lander West and deliver the first subsurface data from these targets.

Further updates will be provided as preparations advance and drilling activities commence.

For further information visit www.firstdevelopmentresources.com or contact the following:

First Development Resources plc

Tristan Pottas (CEO)

Tel: +44 (0) 20 3778 1397

Beaumont Cornish Limited

Nominated Adviser

Roland Cornish / Asia Szusciak

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7628 3396

SI Capital Limited

Broker

Nick Emerson

Tel: +44 (0) 1483 413 500

Beaumont Cornish Limited (“Beaumont Cornish”) is the Company’s Nominated Adviser and is authorised and regulated by the FCA. Beaumont Cornish’s responsibilities as the Company’s Nominated Adviser, including a responsibility to advise and guide the Company on its responsibilities under the AIM Rules for Companies and AIM Rules for Nominated Advisers, are owed solely to the London Stock Exchange. Beaumont Cornish is not acting for and will not be responsible to any other persons for providing protections afforded to customers of Beaumont Cornish nor for advising them in relation to the proposed arrangements described in this announcement or any matter referred to in it.

ABOUT FIRST DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES

First Development Resources’ assets comprise eight granted tenements covering a total area of 2,314.4km2. Five of the tenements, comprising three prospective copper-gold projects, are located in Western Australia (WA) while the remaining three tenements, comprising a rare-earth element (REE), uranium, lithium and gold project, are located in the Australian’s Northern Territory. All tenements are wholly owned by FDR. The assets are a mixture of drill ready and earlier stage exploration.

The WA Projects include the Company’s Wallal Project as well as Ripon Hills and Braeside West Projects situated in the Paterson Province, which is widely regarded as one of the most productive regions in Australia for the discovery of world-class gold-copper deposits, and which is home to several world-class mines and more recent discoveries.

The Selta Project in the Northern Territory is located in an area considered highly prospective for uranium and rare-earth element mineralisation along with base and precious metal mineralisation. Numerous companies are actively exploring within the region.

Beyond the existing portfolio, FDR is actively looking to expand its portfolio through the acquisition of early-stage exploration projects in Australia.

SELTA PROJECT INDICATIVE OPERATIONAL TIMELINE

Indicative operational milestones for exploration activities at the Selta Project. Schedule subject to change.

I would like to receive Brand Communications updates and news...
Free Stock Updates & News
I agree to have my personal information transfered to MailChimp ( more information )
Join over 3.000 visitors who are receiving our newsletter and learn how to optimize your blog for search engines, find free traffic, and monetize your website.
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.