Home » Posts tagged 'technical'

Tag Archives: technical

#SVML Sovereign Metals Limited – Successful Rehabilitation Trials

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

·    Critical DFS workstream de-risked – Mine Closure and Rehabilitation Plan based on empirical field data from Sovereign’s successful pilot mining and rehabilitation trial.

·    Second year of rehabilitation trials near completion – Extended programme builds on proven first-year results and demonstrates that land can be rehabilitated post mining, with refined rehabilitation methods improving crop yields by 520% over multiple seasons.

·   Community partnership deepens – Participating farmers to establish a farming co-operative, a central pillar of Sovereign’s post-closure social transition strategy, to ensure sustainable results well beyond the completion of the trial.

·    Supports IFC collaboration – Multi-year rehabilitation outcomes provide irrefutable empirical evidence of alignment with IFC Performance Standards, closure and rehabilitation planning incorporated in the DFS and ESIA.

Sovereign Metals Limited (ASX:SVM; AIM:SVML; OTCQX:SVMLF) (Sovereign or the Company) is pleased to announce that its second year of rehabilitation trials at the Kasiya Rutile-Graphite Project (Kasiya or the Project) is nearing completion during the upcoming harvest season in Malawi.  The pilot mining, backfilling, and rehabilitation program is a key workstream and input into the Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS), which is being completed under the oversight of the Sovereign-Rio Tinto Technical Committee.

 

Figures 1 & 2: Pilot mining site post-mining and following rehabilitation.

The rehabilitation trials provide practical, multi-year evidence demonstrating Sovereign’s alignment with international rehabilitation, environmental, and community good-practice standards. Empirical data from the trials has been used to prepare the Mine Closure and Mine Rehabilitation Plans, which are now integrated into the mining, backfilling and post-mining closure planning – critical components for project bankability and alignment with the standards required by development finance institutions.

The rehabilitation programme has also contributed to a significant community development outcome. After two years of close collaboration, the 28 local farmers involved in the trials have formally requested that Sovereign remains at the trial site and support them in establishing a farming co-operative. This represents a strong community endorsement of the program’s value and is a central pillar of Kasiya’s post-closure social transition strategy – demonstrating that the Project can deliver lasting economic benefits to local communities well beyond the mine life.

The outcomes directly complement the recently announced collaboration with the International Finance Corporation (IFC), a member of the World Bank Group, which is supporting integration of IFC Performance Standards into the Project’s DFS and Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA), and strengthening Kasiya’s pathway to bankable development and international project financing.

Sovereign Metals Managing Director and CEO Frank Eagar commented:

“Sovereign’s primary objective is to deliver sustainable returns for all stakeholders, including shareholders and local communities. Not only will the overwhelming success and empirical data collected through this pilot mining and rehabilitation trial underpin the DFS accuracy, but it also demonstrates that land post mining can be successfully rehabilitated and our ability to improve agricultural productivity. The 5-fold increase in maize yields will enable unprecedented and immediate secondary economic benefits. The emerging co-operative model is a  practical example of our commitment in action – transforming mined land into more productive farmland while equipping local communities with the skills and infrastructure to thrive independently.”

PROVEN REHABILITATION RESULTS

The second year of trials builds on the success of the first year, which delivered maize yields of 5.2 tonnes per hectare versus the regional average of 1 tonne per hectare – a fivefold increase that confirmed post-mining land can achieve superior agricultural productivity compared to pre-mining land, which loses crop carrying capacity at 3 to 4% per annum.

Sovereign’s rehabilitation approach is designed to use agricultural inputs while maximising long-term agricultural sustainability. Lime, fertiliser and biochar were applied during the first year of rehabilitation, with only targeted supplementation in the second year where specific deficiencies in basic nutrients were identified. Rehabilitation activities are conducted under a no-tillage, minimal soil disturbance principle. No heavy machinery is permitted on rehabilitated soils; all activities are undertaken by hand to preserve soil structure and the effectiveness of applied ameliorants. This simple, replicable approach is specifically designed to be adopted and maintained by local farming communities beyond mine closure.

DIVERSIFIED CROPPING SYSTEM

The second year of trials has expanded the rehabilitation approach into a diversified multi-cropping system, combining maize with bamboo (Giant Bamboo – Dendrocalamus asper), winter beans, grass fodder and groundnuts. First-year results confirmed that bamboo and maize co-exist with minimal competition, functioning in a symbiotic manner that supports long-term land productivity. Through the intercropping approach, local farmers were able to exceed their usual crop yields, while, in parallel, the Bamboo has been allowed to mature as a long-term carbon and soil remediation solution.  The multi-cropping approach provides participating communities with a wider range of food, cash and fodder crops – supporting year-round agricultural viability and the transformation from subsistence to commercial farming on rehabilitated land.

Second-year crop yields are expected to reach the first-year benchmark of 5.2 tonnes per hectare when harvested in mid-2026.

 

Figures 3 & 4: Bamboo and maize intercropping system & Sovereign’s rehabilitation showing maize intercropped with bamboo (February 2026).

COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS 

Farmer engagement and participation are central to the long-term success of Kasiya’s rehabilitation strategy. The rehabilitation approach uses simple agronomic methods carried out largely by hand, ensuring that local communities can sustain and build on the improved farming practices beyond mine closure.

Sovereign has worked closely with local farmers over the past two years, who have been integral to the success of the rehabilitation program. This deepening partnership has resulted in participating farmers formally requesting that Sovereign remains involved at the trial site and provide support in establishing a farming co-operative – a strong endorsement of the program’s value to the local communities. The development of community-led farming co-operatives forms a central pillar of Sovereign’s post-closure social transition strategy. The Company plans to continue working with local farmers throughout 2026, with a view to establishing a replicable model that can be scaled across the broader Kasiya project area as mining progresses.

Figure 5: Rehabilitation site farmers with agreements on setting up a farming co-operative.

An aerial view of a farm AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figures 6-8: Images showing the progression of mining, backfilling and rehabilitation at
Sovereign’s Rehabilitation Trail Site.

 

Enquiries

Frank Eagar, Managing Director & CEO

South Africa / Malawi

+27 21 140 3190

Sapan Ghai, CCO

London

+44 207 478 3900

 

 

Nominated Adviser on AIM and Joint Broker 

 

SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP 

+44 20 3470 0470 

Ewan Leggat 

Charlie Bouverat 

 

 

 

Joint Broker 

 

Stifel 

+44 20 7710 7600 

Varun Talwar 

 

Ashton Clanfield 

 

 

#HREE Harena Rare Earths PLC – Completion of Pre-Feasibility Study

Harena Rare Earths Plc (LSE: HREE) (OTCQB: CRMNF), the rare earths company focused on the Ampasindava ionic clay rare earth project in Madagascar (the “Ampasindava Project“), is pleased to announce the highlights from its completed pre-feasibility study (“PFS“). The PFS represents an important advancement in the development of the Ampasindava Project, confirming its technical viability and providing a robust economic and operational framework to support the next phase of project progression. 

The PFS was compiled by the Company with leading global engineering group SGS engaged to support technical inputs to the PFS and also to conduct an update of the 2023 Mineral Resource Estimate to JORC 2012 standard.

PFS HIGHLIGHTS 

Robust technical and economic viability for long life heap leach operation

Total rare earth oxide (TREO1) of ~71kt, over a measured 20-year life of mine (LOM)

Plant throughput set at 5Mtpa (dry) at average grade at 1,500 ppm TREO supported by independent metallurgical test work

Pre-production capital cost estimate of US$142 million, including 25% in EPCM (engineering, procurement and construction management) and funding costs

Annual TREO production estimate of 4,000 tonnes per year

 

°

Annual oxide (NdPr + DyTb) production of 1,700t per year (29,670t for 20 years)

°

Ratio of magnetic rare earth oxide (Magnet REO2) yielded to TREO despatched at 41%

Excellent economic returns modelled using analyst sourced long term pricing

Undiscounted LOM free cashflow of US$1.0 billion post-tax

Pre Tax NPV10 of US$343.7 million

Pre Tax IRR of 34%

Post Tax NPV10 of US$249.6 million

Post Tax IRR of 30%

Payback period of 4 years

Outstanding financial metrics based on current publicly sourced consensus rare earth pricing

Undiscounted LOM free cashflow of US$2.6 billion post-tax

Pre Tax NPV10 of US$616.1 million

Pre Tax IRR of 30% (Consensus pricing more optimistic in later years)

Post Tax NPV10 of US$464.3 million

Post Tax IRR of 27%

Payback period of 5 years

Economic outcome summary

The Company has modelled the Ampasindava Project’s economics using two sets of rare earth oxide price forecasts. The base case uses a price deck sourced from a recognised Minerals Analyst for the years between 2025 and 2044. The Consensus Price deck is sourced using artificial intelligence (AI) applications that scrape web information on publicly available REO pricing forecasts between 2030 and 2049. In addition, the Company has modelled a situation, called Ampas Plus, using the base case price deck with a 10% reduction in opex and capex applied throughout.

Pre Tax 20 Yr NPV10 and IRR

NPV10

IRR

Payback

Base Case using Long-term Analyst Prices

USD 349 m

4 Yrs

Base Case using Current AI Consensus Prices

USD 616 m

30%

5 Yrs*

Ampas Plus – Opex and Capex Savings

USD 439 m

3 Yrs

Post Tax 20 Yr NPV10 and IRR

NPV10

IRR

Payback

Base Case using Analyst Prices

USD 249 m

30%

3 Yrs

Artificial Intelligence Consensus Prices

USD 464 m

27%

  6 Yrs*

Ampas Plus – Opex and Capex Savings

USD 327 m

36%

3 Yrs

* Consensus pricing more optimistic in later years

1. All references to Oxides are based on the contained level of those Oxides within the MREC product, noting the TREO contains La2O3 + CeO2 +Pr6O11 + Nd2O3 + Sm2O3 + Eu2O3 + Gd2O3 + Tb4O7 + Dy2O3 + Ho2O3 + Er2O3 + Tm2O3 + Yb2O3 + Lu2O3 + Y2O3

2. Magnetic Rare Earth Oxides (Magnetic REO) = Pr6O11 + Nd2O3 + Tb4O7 + Dy2O3

20 Year Prices forecast sourced from AI tools scraping web information on REO pricing forecasts

Ampasindava Project rapidly advancing and progressively de-risked

Planning for a phased “Proof of Concept” plant at site is underway:

 

°

Initial establishment of a permanent on-site laboratory

 

°

Establishment of on-site test cribs and columns

 

°

Opportunity to optimise flowsheet and test downstream rare earth separation at a pilot scale

Selection of specialists to compile DFS and upgrade PFS to reduce cost and process risk

Commence targeted cost reduction and optimisation initiatives including:

 

°

Selection of high-grade zones for initial inclusion in mine plan

 

°

Optimising supply chain options

Strong national government support

Strong engagement with Malagasy national and regional governments

Environmental and social studies continue to support permitting and local validation

Permitting on track to allow construction to commence in 2027

Social programs will focus on suitable and appropriate land compensation, job creation, education of youth, individual technical skills development, and local business creation and readiness

Allan Mulligan, Executive Technical Director of Harena, said:

“The completion of the PFS represents a significant step forward for Harena and the Ampasindava Project. With significant previous investment in resource development, process testwork and environmental programs, we have an excellent understanding of the Ampasindava Project where we can now further optimise the asset as we move into the final piloting and studies phase.

The Ampasindava Project hosts a world-class scale ionic absorption rare earths mineralisation, particularly amenable to low cost and high yield recoveries. The sustainable and rapid remediation heap leach extraction model will serve to enhance the local, regional and national economy with no lasting impacts on the environment. 

Our confidence in the results of the PFS and the underlying PFS process more broadly is based on the enormous previous works and current understanding of the orebody, and the inclusion of the Proof-of-Concept plant in 2026 will allow a smooth and organised mobilisation into construction with reduced start up risk.”

Ivan Murphy, Executive Chairman of Harena, said: 

“We are extremely pleased to be releasing the excellent results of this pre-feasibility study to the market. The key metrics presented here clearly highlight the exceptional scale, quality and strategic significance of the Ampasindava Project, reinforcing its position as a world-class heavy rare earth asset and marking a major milestone in its progression towards development.

I would like to sincerely thank Allan Mulligan, our Executive Technical Director, for his dedication over the recent months, as well as the wider internal and external teams whose expertise and commitment have been instrumental in delivering this important result.” 

SUMMARY REPORT

Introduction

Harena Rare Earths Plc is pleased to present the Pre-Feasibility Study (“PFS“) outcomes for its Ampasindava Rare Earth Ionic Clay Project (the “Ampasindava Project” or “Project“), located in the province of Antsiranana in north eastern Madagascar.

Harena has engaged leading global engineering group SGS to support technical inputs to the PFS and also to conduct an update of the 2023 Mineral Resource Estimate to JORC 2012 standard.

The compilation of the PFS has been internally managed by Harena. The initial study was conducted in order to meet regulatory requirements for the conversion of the Permit Research licence to a Permit Exploitation licence.

Several programs of metallurgical testwork were conducted by SGS and results emanating from several bulk sample leaching programs have been employed into the PFS design.

In line with international standards for feasibility studies, the PFS is generally in line with AACE Class 4 estimates and accuracy is in range of -30/+40. The planned on-site Proof of Concept demonstration plant will allow these estimates to be greatly enhanced and derisked.

Key PFS Outcomes and Assumptions

The PFS confirms the robust technical and economic viability for development of a mining and processing operation to produce a MREC product at the Ampasindava Project.

This has included:

An updated global Mineral Resource Estimate of 606,000 tonnes of TREO with:

 

°

41kt of TREO in Measured Resources,

 

°

Indicated Resources of 156kt of TREO, and

 

°

Inferred Resources totalling 410kt of TREO.

The hand-sinking of 4,474 vertical test pits up to 10m deep,

Some 31,000 pit samples across the pedolith and saprolite areas of the pits,

A total of 277 vertical diamond drill holes,

Maximum head grades of 2.24% TREO and a global average of 868 ppm TREO,

Substantial metallurgical testwork with SGS and other consultants over several years of testing, including at least two bulk sample programs,

A range of yield payability favouring higher demand TREOs and resulting in a nett of 75%, and

The use of 3 to 4 concurrent satellite mining pits to ameliorate risk and optimise grade recovery.

A summary of the physical and financial evaluation of the Project utilising a heap leach farm with a 5.0 Mtpa throughput rate is shown in Table 1 below. Additional details are set out below in the descriptive summary.

Table 1: Production Outcomes and Assumptions – Base Case

 

Parameter

Unit

Amount

LOM

Years

20

LOM Feed

M tonnes

88

LOM Waste

M tonnes

13

LOM Strip Ratio

Avg

1:6

LOM TREO Head Grade (static model)

ppm

1,525

Total REO Feed

k tonnes

134.6

Total REO Production

k tonnes

71.1

Average REO Production

k tonnes / annum

3.5

Average TREO Payability

%

75

Total LOM Revenue

US$M

4,481.7

REO Revenue

US$ / kg REO

63

Magnet REO (NdPr + DyTb) Ratio in Conc.

%

42%

Magnet REO Value in Conc.

%

93%

Total LOM OPEX

US$M

2,743

OPEX, average

US$M / annum

137.1

OPEX, average

US$ / tonne Ore

31.3

OPEX, average

US$ / kg REO

38.5

CAPEX, upfront

US$M

142

CAPEX, ongoing

US$M

19

EBITDA

US$M

1,502

Free Cash Flow (Post Tax)

US$M

1,015

Net Present Value (Post Tax) (Real) 10%

US$M

249.6

Internal Rate of Return (Real, Unlevered) IRR

%

30

Payback

Years

4

Mineral Resource Estimate Detail

SGS was commissioned by Harena to review and restate the 2023 MRE in accordance with the guidelines of the JORC 2012 Code. The restated MRE issued by SGS (Camus, 2023) summarised below has an Effective Date of 1 November 2023:

The relevance of this resource supports many important project enablers. The fact it is an ionic clay resource leads to low capital and low operating cost metrics. Simple, cheap salt washing is all that is required to liberate the ionised adsorption bond of rare earth minerals from the gangue material they are held with. 

Well-structured ionic clay deposits are rare and the deposit at the Ampasindava Project is as good as any from a global perspective. 

Table 2.  Mineral Resource Estimate for Ampasindava Project Deposit at Cut-Off of 500 ppm TREO 

Classification

Tonnage
(Mt)

Volume
(Mm3)

Area
(Mm2)

Density
(t/m3)

Thickness (m)

TREO
(ppm)

MREO
(ppm)

MREO /
TREO
ratio

Contained
TREO
(t)

Contained
MREO
(t)

Total

PED

SAP

Measured

42.5

38.1

7.0

1.11

5.46

2.85

2.60

958

221

23%

40,700

9,400

Indicated

184.0

167.1

25.0

1.10

6.70

2.65

4.04

842

178

21%

154,800

32,700

Measured
+ Indicated

226.5

205.3

31.9

1.10

6.43

2.70

3.73

863

186

22%

195,500

42,100

Inferred

472.0

429.1

78.9

1.10

5.44

2.71

2.73

870

189

22%

410,500

89,000

Total

698.5

634.3

110.8

1.10

5.72

2.71

3.02

868

188

22%

606,000

131,100

1.

The Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) has an effective date of the 1st of November 2023. The Competent Person for the MRE is Mr. Yann Camus, P.Eng., an employee of SGS.

2.

The classification of the current Mineral Resource Estimate is consistent with the 2012 Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (the JORC Code).

3.

All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate and numbers may not add due to rounding.

4.

All Resources are presented undiluted and in situ, constrained within a 3D model, and are considered to have reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction.

5.

Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.

6.

Bulk density values were determined based on physical test work from each part of the deposit.

7.

The base cut-off grade (500ppm) TREO considers a mining cost of US$1.40/t mined, processing cost of US$8.00/t mined, and G&A cost of US$0.75/t mined.

8.

TREO = Y2O3+Eu2O3+Gd2O3+Tb2O3+Dy2O3+Ho2O3+Er2O3+Tm2O3+Yb2O3+Lu2O3+La2O3+Ce2O3+Pr2O3+Nd2O3+Sm2O3

9.

MREO = Pr2O3+Nd2O3+Tb2O3+Dy2O3

10.

The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.

Important note:

The Company advises that the PFS is based on the JORC 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate, however, a Mineral Reserve has not yet been estimated. There is no certainty that further economic assessment will result in the eventual conversion of Mineral Resources to Ore Reserves or that the production target itself, assumptions used in the Study and resulting economic outcomes will be realised. The stated production target is based on the Company’s current expectations of future results or events and should not be solely relied upon by investors when making investment decisions. Further evaluation work and appropriate studies are required to establish sufficient confidence that this target will be met. Engineering studies and estimates including peer works support capital and operating cost estimates and are based on standard extraction and processing techniques. Non‐binding discussions are underway with interested parties for offtake of planned production. Discussions with third party infrastructure providers are underway. Extensive environmental baseline studies have been completed and no social, environmental, legal or regulatory impediments to development have been identified. The Pre-Feasibility Study is based on 100% of Measured and Indicated Resource. A Mineral Reserve has not been estimated at this time.

Project Design and Philosophy 

The Ampasindava Project is a large-scale, long-life, REE Project in north eastern Madagascar. REE will be extracted from a 20 km long near surface ionic adsorption clay ore-body spanning the peninsular of Ampasindava in the province of Antsiranana in northern Madagascar. According to the PFS, commencing at 2.5 million tonnes treated per annum, by year 5, the Project will be processing 5 million tonnes of ionic adsorption clay ore through two process plant modules producing an estimated 4,000 tonnes of TREO despatched as 6,700 tonnes of mixed rare earth carbonate concentrate (MREC) at 60% per annum with an annual value of approximately US$250 million.

Some 88 million dry tonnes of ionic clay ore are expected to be processed, extracted and returned to the mine cavities over the 20+ year Project life. The Project is expected to deliver estimated gross royalty payments to Madagascar of US$220 million plus corporate tax contributions of US$320 million over its life based upon the existing JORC Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) as of November 2023. 

The proposed mining and processing sequence which is labelled “A rapid remediation, zero harm mining system”, returns neutral and non-toxic clays back to the mining cavity within a very short timeframe, allowing for land re-use or natural rehabilitation to occur. The system involves:

Operating from 3 or 4 concurrent satellite mining pits within the mining zone

Removal and temporary storage of a 0.6m thick surface layer of topsoil that will be replaced following complete backfill of the mining pit

Removal of an average 5-6 metre layer of ionic-adsorption REE clay ore using truck and shovel and hauling this material to the process plant

Transport of the material to a ring-fenced leaching farm which is environmentally isolated from natural water courses and the effects of excessive rainfall

Agglomerating the ionic-adsorption REE clay to increase its permeability before placing it in 3m high stacks on top of an impermeable lining

Placing mobile irrigating pipe systems on the heaps

Desorbing the ionically adsorbed REE first into natural sea water and then into an ammonium sulphate lixiviant at pH 4 that is percolated through the clay-ore heap onto the HDPE liner which directs it to a process liquor pond

Concentrating the REE within the ammonium sulphate lixiviant via an ion exchange process in a nano filtration membrane circuit. This step will consequently produce large volumes of clean and neutral water that will be available for use as process water, dust control and irrigation of crops

Returning the “spent-ore” to the mining pit once the REE has been desorbed from the clay and residual ammonium sulphate has been washed out

Returning the overburden to the mining pit which in combination with the returned “spent-ore” will completely fill the mining void.

The full mining, processing and rehabilitation cycle is expected to be about 3 months and the moving mining footprint will be similar to the area disturbed by 3 months of mining which will be between 10 and 15 hectares. 

The Project will preferentially employ local people with the appropriate skills and qualifications over the life of the Project and expects that almost all the 400-person workforce will be Malagasy by Year 5. Adult skills training and a focus on education support will develop local capacity and facilitate employment of local people including women into technical and managerial roles with the Project. 

A comprehensive Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) of the Project is being undertaken in accordance with Office of Natural Environment (ONE) requirements and following IFC standard best practices. The social program and procurement strategy is based on the mantra – Local First, Regional Second and National and International Third. The intention is to create sources of income and wealth centres for local, impoverished Malagasy and secure a sense of local ownership of the Project. This inspires commitment, protection and self-interest to protect and uplift the project.

Process Recovery Methods

Ionic adsorption clay deposits are known for their relatively simple low capital processing arrangements. REE adsorbed onto clays are simply desorbed using an ion-exchange-based elution process with eluants such as sodium chloride or ammonium sulphate. 

Ore is agglomerated at the ROM pad before being stacked in heaps of 80m width and 240m length on a sealed impervious layered heap foundation. There will be 26 of these heaps for a 5 Mtpa production cycle. 

Heaps are 3m high but can sometimes be built higher to increase production. Drip irrigation is used to minimize evaporation, provide more uniform distribution of the leach solution, and avoid damaging the exposed mineral. 

The solution then percolates through the heap and desorbs both the target and other minerals. This process, called the “leach cycle,” generally takes from less than one month for simple oxide ores. The leach solution containing the dissolved rare earths is then collected, treated in a simple process plant to recover the mixed rare earth as a carbonate product. The mother liquor, now rich in ammonium sulfate is recycled to the heap after reagent levels are adjusted. Ultimate recovery of the target mineral can range up to 80% 

Heap leaching does not produce large tailings dams and the amount of overall environmental impact caused by heap leaching is often lower than more traditional techniques and is therefore more environmentally friendly. It also requires less energy consumption to use this method, which many consider to be an environmental alternative.

The indicative and conceptual process flow sheet is indicated below in Figure 1. 

Figure 1. Conceptual Flow Sheet for the Ampasindava Project Heap Leach Ores

Organisational Planning

The Ampasindava Project organisational chart is listed below in Figure 2. The organisational chart allocates operational responsibility amongst the functional contractors and service providers.

Each functional contractor and service provider will include their required personnel structures and staff numbers in the tender procurement process. This will allow the Company to scale the camp and personnel transport facilities accordingly.  

Figure 2. Organisational Structure of Mine Operations

The fully-outsourced procurement model is functionally attractive for the construction and operation of remote mining operations. The specialist engineering and operations are left to functional experts and owner’s mine management can oversee and focus on the core mineral beneficiation function. 

It is expected that at least 50% of the mine personnel will live in private accommodation in villages nearby.

Capital and Operating Costs

The capital cost estimate is broken down into the main areas of infrastructure, camp and offices, mining and processing plant and associated project costs, as shown in Table 3. The mining capital cost estimate was developed by Harena with input from contract mining service providers elsewhere in Africa and the general and plant capital cost estimate was developed by first order assessments from other projects located globally. 

The capital estimate is subject to a study upgrade where the PFS will be enhanced to definitive level and the capital estimates will be supported by design criteria and a higher level of supplier enquiries and quotes. 

Table 3.  Ampasindava Project summary of CAPEX breakdown (in US$M).

Breakdown

Area

Est

USDm

 

Management

Owners Cost

Budget

3.0

Design and Build

Est %

18.0

Funding Cost and Fees

Est

9.0

Contingency

Total %

4.0

Mining Fleet

Mixed Plant

Est

8.5

Heap Farm & Process

Earthworks and Engineering

Est

7.0

Leaching Infrastructure

Eng

10.1

Power and Water

Est

14.0

RO and Nano Filtration

Est & Quote

60.0

Other Infrastructure

Roads and Camp

Est

5.2

Water Borne and Other

Est

0.8

Communication and FIFO

Est

2.7

Total

 

 

142.34

 

Ongoing

 

 

19.00

 

Total LOM

 

Closure Costs

 

 

 

Est

161.39

 

14.5

 

 

 

The operating cost estimates were developed in loose collaboration with mining contractors from other African projects, engineering consultants in Australia and other local cost indexes.

The operating costs were prepared using the WBS and some equipment lists generated for the project. These estimates were prepared in US$. 

Table 4. A summary of the operating costs estimate broken down into respective components. 

 

OPEX Breakdown

LOM OPEX

US$m

Average Annual OPEX, US$m

Average OPEX, US$/kg REO

Average OPEX, US$/tonne ROM

% of Total

Mining

844.8

42.2

11.5

9.6

30.8

Processing

1,050.6

52.5

14.7

11.9

38.3

Other Direct Costs

499.5

25.1

7.0

5.7

18.3

Overhead

343.9

19.2

4.8

3.9

12.6

TOTAL

2,743

136.9

38.5

31.1

100

1.14 Manning and Personnel

It is intended to source skilled and semi-skilled staff under the following guiding principles:

Local First,

Regional Second,

National Third, and

International only for highly specialised and temporary assignments.

The Paterson system of job ranking will be used and there will be no discrimination on the basis of gender, age, race or disability. Thus, all appointments will be merit based.

Approximately only 8 Expatriate Staff will be forecast to work at the operation during the initial years. These will be specialist Process and Engineering skills that will assist in reaching the demanding production rate of 5 million tonnes processed per annum.

On the job training and skills development of Malagasy professionals will allow these expatriate employees to retreat. Most staff will be encouraged to live in nearby towns and establish localised homes and encourage a family working environment. 

Table 5. Operational Manning Estimate 

Functional Element

Number

Owner

Owners Management

10

Owner

Mining

169

Contractors plus

Processing

62

Owner/Contractor

Engineering

66

Contractor

SHEC

42

Contractor

Admin

29

Contractors

Total

378

Please refer to the PFS announcement available on Harena’s website for an Employment Organigram for the Ampasindava Project Rare Earth Mine.

Next Steps – Proof of Concept Plant 

The critical next step for all leach operations is the test and proof that the design process operates under ambient conditions in the field adjacent to the mineral source. Harena plans to permit and construct a Proof of Concept (PoC) plant at the mine processing site. This exercise will take approximately 9 months and will operate for as long is necessary to provide de-risked operating confirmation of the process and leach lixiviant requirements, the environmental outcomes and the economic and technical viability of the planned operation.

Following successful deployment of the PoC, the Company will move to further design and a Decision to Mine which would launch construction and project activities proper.

The image below in Figure 3 is a representative Project in Chile but is a good representation of a Proof of Concept heap leach and recovery mine plant. It appears that about 5,000 to 6,000 tonnes was heap leached here. 

Figure 3.  Representative image of a PoC plant operating in Chile

Project planning for the PoC project includes the following steps: 

The Company wishes to fast-track progress on the Proof of Concept Plant. Validation of an in-house metallurgical design flowsheet is essential for funding and market confidence. This process can take up to 12 months or more depending on results achieved.

The PoC plant development process will be staged. The first stage will be as follows:

1.

Mining Permit for Extraction;

2.

Interim environmental approval from ONE;

3.

Social and regional approvals and acknowledgement from local stakeholders; and

4.

Construction commences to facilitate permanent laboratory.

The process to be followed will be:

Building of a life of mine shed at site which will accommodate suitable numbers of columns, small cribs and then larger cribs to be acquired in country;

Diesel power supply for lighting, pumps and fans;

Cement mixer type agglomerator and hand held material handling;

Suitable starter laboratory such that the works can be measured and assessed;

Small salts storage and mixing area with appropriate ventilation and handling facilities;

Small office and ablutions to provide support; and

Fit for purpose communications infrastructure.

Based on success achieved operating the on-site facility, the PoC will be expanded into the main facility immediately upon activation thereof. This will be termed stage 2. The process to be followed will be:

a.

Appointment of the technical team to lead mining, leaching and recovery.

b.

Brief level 1 design of the PoC mine and limited infrastructure – much can be disposable.

c.

Individual scopes of work for 4 packages representing the four areas of operation. These should reflect a minimalistic approach for limited services.

d.

Approval of program and budget from Ionic RE Executive.

e.

Submission of Environmental Amendment to ESIA.

f.

Follow on application to Mines Department for exemption to commence on small scale.

g.

Regulatory approval/exemption from Ministry.

h.

Procurement Inquiries to approved vendors for equipment and services as required.

i.

Procurement request for Interest on various contract works with local approved construction and engineering and earthworks companies.

j.

Communication and relocation of limited affected persons.

k.

Contractor approval and execution of main two contractors for primary construction, power supply, water and other services including base temporary roads.

l.

Operational plan from same two contractors, if possible.

m.

Development of technical and management control systems for Rwenzori RM and Ionic RE.

n.

Mobilisation to site and commencement of 1st pad and temporary infrastructure.

Schedule 

Initial planning for the demo plant to have completed its purpose was set at a time period of 240 days. Contingent issues affecting the schedule are: 

Effective planning and adequate scope inclusions;

Permissions from the Ministries and the possible need for exemptions/deferrals;

Logistic solutions and regulatory impacts;

Long Lead Time items, such as the RO plants and other, and

Re-iterations and the ease with which these can be commenced.

 

Budget for PoC

The budget for the demo plant currently stands at US$11.5m to be spent after award of the Mining Permit Exploitation and the rising of capital to construct. 

The major cost unknown is not the construction cost and this amount may be adequate. However, the duration of operation of the PoC mine could require significant contingent provisions.

The approach would be that if an early enough confidence can be achieved with the initial 90 days plus 30 days operation of the leach pad and assuming that regulatory licences have been issued, an opportunity is created for an accelerated build of the mine can be commenced, making the extended operation of the PoC mine much more acceptable and somewhat more cost effective. 

Please refer to the PFS announcement available on Harena’s website for a summary of the budget for Proof of Concept Construction Capital. 

Permitting 

The conversion of a mining exploration licence (PR) to a mining exploitation licence (PE) in Madagascar is primarily governed by Law No. 2023-007 (New Mining Code). This process is managed by the Bureau du Cadastre Minier de Madagascar (BCMM) under the authority of the Ministry of Mines.

Current requirements for conversion (transformation) include:

Environmental and Social Compliance

Environmental Impact Study (EIE);

Social Responsibility Plan (PRSE): Applicants must submit a plan for social responsibility and contribute to the Mining Fund for Social and Community Investment (FMISC); and

Environmental Rehabilitation Plan.

Technical and Financial Requirements

Pre-Feasibility Study;

Cahier des Charges Minières (CCM): Every permit must include a specifications book detailing specific technical and financial obligations; and

Workforce Requirements

Legal Status and Tenure

Eligibility where the applicant must be a legal entity registered under Malagasy law. Under the new code, a PE is valid for 25 years, renewable once for 15 years (reduced from the previous 40-year term). The permit holder must secure a lease agreement or prior agreement from the landowner for surface rights.

Applications for transformation are currently being processed by the BCMM following the lift of a previous moratorium, though a ministerial order from the Minister in charge of Mines is still required for each final approval. 

Pricing Assumptions and Forecast Methodology

The economic model has been developed using long term pricing from a recognised market analyst and Artificial Intelligence forecast consensus pricing. 

The base case economic indicators have been derived using the market analyst pricing which has been developed prior to the recently highly publicised interventions into the Rare Earths market by an alliance of Western Nations concerned by the dominant position of China in the processing and refining of these products.

In regard to the different forecasts for the magnet metals, prices forecast by AI are Nd (1/3rd), Pr (1/3rd), Dy (2/3rds) and Tb (1/3rd) higher than the more conservative and earlier forecast by the market analyst.    

These forecasts are underpinned by open-sourced comprehensive analysis of global supply and demand trends. On the demand side, projections reflect anticipated growth in key sectors such as electric vehicle drive-trains, wind turbines, energy transition technologies, robotics, and particular military defence applications. Supply assumptions incorporate current global production levels and publicly announced future projects, offering a well-rounded view of the evolving market.

Sensitivity Analysis

A sensitivity analysis was performed for the Project, highlighting its resilience to variations in capital costs, operating costs, REO recoveries and Prices.

The results of the sensitivity analysis variable intervals of +10%/-10% is indicated in the graph below, highlighting that the Project is particularly sensitive to REO prices received and metallurgical recoveries. This would imply that particular care will be taken during the operations of the afore-mentioned Proof of Concept plant to optimise these recoveries, even at the expense of some extra cost inputs.  

A graph of different colored lines AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 4. Ampasindava Project Sensitivity Analysis for base case conditions.

Forward Work Program 

The forward work program has been allocated to three distinct estimated time related milestones. 

Award of Mining Licence and further permitting requirements

Q1 2026

Operations of Proof of Concept Plant and feed results into final design parameters

Q2 2027

Detailed design and Financial Investment Decision (FID)

Q4 2027

The Company has developed a Joint Roadmap to production as a communication and planning tool for the Project and financial stakeholders. The stakeholders of the Project have been identified as:

Members of Harena Rare Earths PLC and investors;

Government of Madagascar in many regulatory and fiscal forms;

Local residents and stakeholders at the mine site and regionally;

Employees of various group companies;

Contractors and service providers;

Customers, other clients and buyers; and

Other interested Governments and product beneficiaries.

Please refer to the PFS announcement available on Harena’s website for the Ampasindava project process flow mapping. 

Material Assumptions and Outcomes

The PFS was completed with the following material assumptions:

Clay winning will be via several (up to 5) satellite pits operating simultaneously and sharing the mining and trucking fleet.

Ore to be excavated through conventional mobile machine operations and trucked to the heap leach farm. No requirement for blasting.

Topsoil will be stockpiled in accessible piles near the mining area so it can be used for rehabilitation once a section of the pit has been backfilled and contoured to final landform.

The processing heap leach farm will be 5.2 Mtpa and the monthly requirement for material movement will on average be 280,000 cubic metres (bcm) of mineralised clay per month.  An additional 35,000 bcm of topsoil and waste is to be moved and stored near the pits each month.

The mine grade has been assumed to be 75% of the average of two bulk samples excavated from the orebody. This aligns with a concerted effort to selectively mine high-grade areas of the orebody.

Overall metallurgical yield has been calculated at 53% TREO. Individual oxide elemental recoveries have been applied as per the test work results.

Revenue is based on individual REO prices as supplied by the market analyst multiplied by individual oxide recoveries. These values reflect gross forward looking revenue streams. An individual payability factor per metal is assumed where higher value/demand products can negotiate better differential payabilities. The highest payability assumed is 80% for Gd2O3 and the lowest is 40% for CeO2. The average basket payability achieved is 75%.

The economic model is denominated in US dollars (USD).

Transportation charges for MREC is estimated at $200/tonne concentrate shipped. Transport charges ex-Madagascar to the separation plant customer have been reflected within the estimated payability factor.

A mine life of 20 years has been assessed for practicality. The African, remote location has meant a discount factor 0f 10% has been used. The tax rate is 20% and the royalty rate is 5% of gross value.

Generally, sea-borne logistics will be used for off-mine transport and supplies/delivery of equipment. Air-borne logistics will be used for personnel travel outside the mine region.

Power consumption is moderate, at about 4MW and will be provided by hybrid solar supported by diesel generation.

Mine plant will initially be contractor owned with a support facility for local truck driver economic aide to purchase mine spec trucks and provide contract deliveries to the heap leach farm.

Camp operations will be outsourced, including the capital and construction. 

Material Modifying Factors

The following modifying factors were considered in relation to the assessment of this PFS:

Location

The Ampasindava Project is located in the eastern part of the Ampasindava Peninsula, Antsiranana Province on the northwest coast of Madagascar, approximately 500 km north of Madagascar’s capital city Antananarivo. The nearest major town and administrative centre of the region is called Ambanja and is located some 40 km to the northeast of the project area. 

The PFS area has ample land for mine development, processing infrastructure, and future expansions. 

The proposed pits and processing facility will be well-connected via a network of paved roads and private gravel roads, facilitating efficient ore transport. The entire mine zone and proposed heap leach farm will be within 10kms of each other.

Power Supply

Power is not readily available in the project area from the national grid. Power at the mine site, expected to require some 6MW, will be supplied by diesel generator units and supplemented by solar installation and battery storage for low critical applications.

The Company will supply the electrical generator equipment for the heap leach processing plant and a 11kV main substation including 2 incomer circuit breakers. In addition, diesel tanks, pump and piping from the tank to the gensets as well as the paralleling and synchronisation control system. 

Generator specifications KH-1000GF set 6 Including diesel boxes, generator control units and 400V switchgear. Also installed will be a DMC 1500 power command paralleling system to balance loads from the power plant. 

Water Supply and Management 

The Project will incorporate advanced water recycling technologies, including ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis (RO) systems, to minimise freshwater consumption and ensure minimal industrial effluent  discharge. Freshwater is available through on-site bores. Sea water is abundant and nearby as the project is within 3km of the coast. The ore beneficiation process is designed for high water efficiency, with >75% of process water recirculated within the plant. 

Water consumption for the Ampasindava Project is expected to be low. This basis is derived from: 

Net positive water balance of the process;

The project areas high annual rainfall;

The process arrangement using heap leaching and maximised water recycling using membrane technology for reagent recovery, resulting in fresh water recovery; and

Given the low forecast water consumption, it is proposed that water for both processing operations and dust management is to be sourced by water harvesting ponds on site and from the mining pit.

During periods of extended dry weather, it is proposed that water could be sourced from boreholes up to 10km from the project area, although local groundwater resources potentially also a source, however, limitation on drawing from local groundwater could limit this option.

Labour and Accommodation

The operation is to be staffed by a residential workforce. No fly in – fly out other than specialised technical and management skills is envisaged and the number of expatriates staff is intended to be low, and to be being phased out over the first 7 years of operations.

The region is poverty stricken and there is no shortage of unskilled and semi-skilled labour. A workforce of semi-skilled and artisanal workers is available in nearby townships and population centres. The closest major population centre is Ambanja, which has a population of 50,000.

The township of Anjiabory is approximately 10km from the project site and the intent is to source local operations staff from the immediate districts and train staff accordingly.

Environmental

The Company has submitted seven environmental monitoring reports. These reports were completed in order to be compliant to the regulation of the Office National de l’Environnement (ONE) and the Ministry of Mines of Madagascar. 

From the point of view of environmental considerations, no sensitive area has yet been established within the exploration license for the period. However, the northeastern part of that exploration license, and an area of approximately 100 km2, is located in a priority area for the establishment of protected areas.

The environmental and social programs will strive to meet international IFC standards.

For further information please contact:

Harena Rare Earths Plc

Ivan Murphy, Executive Chairman

Allan Mulligan, Executive Technical Director

 

 

+44 (0)20 7770 6424

 

 

SP Angel – Joint Broker

Ewan Leggat / Josh Ray (Corporate Finance)

 

 

+44 (0)20 3470 0470

 

Marex Financial – Corporate Advisor

Angelo Sofocleous / Keith Swann / Matt Bailey (Broking)

 

+44 (0)20 7655 6000

corporate@marex.com

 

Allenby Capital – Financial Adviser & Joint Broker

Jeremy Porter / Vivek Bhardwaj (Corporate Finance)

Amrit Nahal / Kelly Gardiner (Sales & Corporate Broking)

 

+44 (0)20 3328 5656 info@allenbycapital.com

 

Muriel Siebert & Co. – US Financial Adviser & Broker

Ajay Asija, Co-Head of Investment Banking

 

+1 (917) 902 7823 aasija@siebert.com

 

Celicourt Communications – Public Relations

Mark Antelme / Charles Denley-Myerson

 

+44 (0)20 7770 6424

harena@celicourt.uk  

#FCM First Class Metals PLC – First Class Metals Attendance Resourcing Tomorrow

First Class Metals PLC (“First Class Metals”, “FCM” or the “Company”), the UK-listed exploration company advancing high-grade, district-scale gold opportunities in Ontario,  Canada, as well as critical metals, is pleased to announce its attendance at Resourcing Tomorrow, taking place from 2-4 December 2025 in London.

Chief Executive Officer, Marc Sale, Executive Chairman, James Knowles, and Company Secretary, Siddharth Muricken,  will be on-site throughout the event at the Business Design Centre, engaging with investors, industry leaders, and potential strategic partners.

Opportunity to Experience FCM’s Ontario Portfolio First-Hand

First Class Metals will be exhibiting at stand C30, where attendees will be able to explore and discuss the Company’s technical progress, strategic development plans and exploration catalysts for 2026.

Core from Three High-Impact Projects on Display

In a major highlight for the event, FCM will be showcasing drill core and geological samples from three projects. For those unable to attend, high-resolution photographs of the core samples are included below, ensuring full visibility for all shareholders.

·    North Hemlo (Gold) – A large, well-positioned gold-prospective land package where drilling is currently under way, supported by multiple identified targets and ongoing geological interpretation.

A close-up of a stone AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 1 – North Hemlo

 

 

·    Sunbeam Gold Project (Gold) – A historically producing district scale gold property hosting documented high-grade vein occurrences, with recent work highlighting areas that remain under-explored.

A rectangular frame with a group of stones in it AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 2 – Sunbeam

 

·    Zigzag (Lithium & Critical Metals) Project – A lithium-bearing project where drilling completed in 2023 returned high-grade Li₂O intercepts, alongside additional critical-metal indicators that continue to be evaluated.

A rectangular frame with a black border and a white and grey stone with black stripes AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 3 – Zigzag

These physical displays provide investors and stakeholders with a rare opportunity to examine the mineralisation style, geological setting, and technical quality driving FCM’s exploration confidence.

James Knowles Executive Chairman commented:

“Our team is genuinely looking forward to connecting with the wider industry at Resourcing Tomorrow. It’s an ideal moment to present the advances across our projects and to give attendees a first-hand look at core from North Hemlo, Sunbeam and Zigzag.”

 

An Ideal Moment to Engage with First Class Metals

The Company continues to build momentum across its Ontario portfolio, and management welcomes the opportunity to meet shareholders, analysts and potential collaborators during the conference.

To arrange a meeting, please contact info@firstclassmetalsplc.com

For further information, please contact:

James Knowles, Executive Chair
Email:
JamesK@Firstclassmetalsplc.com
Tel: 07488 362641

Marc J Sale, CEO, Executive Director
Email:
MarcS@Firstclassmetalsplc.com
Tel: 07711 093532

AlbR Capital Limited (Financial Adviser)
David Coffman

Website:
www.albrcapital.com
Tel: (0)20 7399 9400

Axis Capital Markets (Broker)
Lewis Jones

Website:
Axcap247.com
Tel: (0)203 026 0449

#URU URU Metals Limited – Launch of Zeb Nickel Project Investor Video

URU Metals (“URU” or the “Company”) has released a concise five-minute investor video introducing the Zeb Nickel Project (the “Project”) located on the mineral rich Northern Limb of the Bushveld Complex in Limpopo Province, South Africa. The video is now available on the Company’s website and as a link: https://urumetals.com/index.php/projects/

The film highlights the Project’s location immediately south-west of Anglo-American Platinum’s Mogalakwena mine and Ivanhoe Mines’ Platreef project. Zone 1, which is one of four vertically stacked mineralised zones, hosts an historical resource of approximately 1.6 billion tonnes at 0.25 % Ni, while recent geophysical work has outlined additional massive-sulphide and gold targets elsewhere on the property. With Environmental Authorisation already in place, URU intends to undertake a 25-hole drill programme designed to deliver a maiden NI 43-101-compliant resource for Zones 2 and an updated resource for Zone 1, which could result in a higher-grade nickel-sulphide resource with PGE credits.

The video follows several recent milestones:

·     The identification of four high-priority massive-sulphide drill targets through advanced 3-D gravity-magnetic inversion.

·   The confirmation of a conduit-hosted ultramafic feeder system and additional drill-ready anomalies from detailed geophysical interpretation.

·      A £420 000 institutional investment secured earlier this month to accelerate drilling and airborne EM survey work

The video can be viewed in the Projects section of the Company’s website: (https://urumetals.com/index.php/projects/).

John Zorbas, CEO, commented:This short video distils the investment case for Zeb Nickel, complementing the technical and funding milestones we have recently reported. It underscores why we believe the project can become a leading source of responsible Class I nickel while offering significant exploration upside to investors.”

For further information, please contact:

URU Metals Limited

John Zorbas, CEO

+1 416 504 3978

SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP

(Nominated Adviser and Broker)

Ewan Leggat / Jen Clarke

+ 44 (0) 203 470 0470

Axis Capital Markets Limited

(Joint Broker)

Lewis Jones

+44 (0) 203 0260320

#BRES Blencowe Resources PLC – Half-year Report

The Company is pleased to announce its Interim Results for the six-month period to 31 March 2024.

Electronic copies of the report will be available at the Company’s website www.blencoweresourcesplc.com

For further information please contact:

Blencowe Resources

Sam Quinn

 

www.blencoweresourcesplc.com

Tel: +44 (0) 1624 681 250

info@blencoweresourcesplc.com

 

Investor Enquiries

Sasha Sethi

Tel: +44 (0) 7891 677 441

sasha@flowcomms.com

 

Tavira Securities Limited

Jonathan Evans

Tel: +44 (0)203 192 1733

jonathan.evans@tavirasecurities.com

 

Interim Management Report

This report covers the period 30 September 2023 to 31 March 2024, and subsequent events to 30 April 2024.

Work has been progressing on many fronts, on four continents, as the Orom-Cross Definitive Feasibility Study “(DFS”) gathers momentum.

In September the long-awaited Technical Assistance Grant Agreement (“TAG”) was signed with the US Government’s private sector investment arm, the Development Finance Corporation (“DFC”).  This is a US$5 million grant awarded to Blencowe to assist with DFS costs and it is with pleasure I note that Blencowe is the first pre-production graphite company to receive such a grant from the US Government.  Aside from the obvious advantages of having approximately 40% of our overall DFS costs being funded for free the credibility of both our Company and our Orom-Cross project are both significantly raised by having a partner of this calibre.  Blencowe wishes to state once again our appreciation to DFC for this grant and all efforts will be made to deliver a first class DFS as a result.

To date US$3 million of this grant funding has been received as tranches are delivered on DFS milestones being achieved.  It is our expectation that the final US$2 million will be received over the next six months for further work and ultimately completion of DFS.  In addition, DFC is mandated to play a role as lead partner in a funding solution for Orom-Cross implementation ahead, and management are working closely with DFC to ensure that this will happen as substantial funding solutions remain the largest challenge for any new graphite project, so to have DFC involved adds significant weight and prestige, and a potential funding party with US$5 million skin in the game.

During this period several key milestones have been met with regards to actual DFS work.  In 2H 2023 a 100-tonne bulk sample was mined and delivered to a technical facility in northern China which is a leading expert on graphite processing, and this ore was then beneficiated into 96% LOI concentrate.  This in turn provides offtakers with the knowledge that commercial scale processing of Orom-Cross ore can deliver same high quality results as all lab-scale testing has shown to date, and secondly to provide a substantial quantum of 96% concentrate for Blencowe to send to various parties as samples, for testing and review.  Following the success of this action, and the request of several tier one potential offtake partners, Blencowe has more recently mined a further 600-tonne bulk sample and sent it to the same facility, for the same reasons.  This latest sample will also be beneficiated beyond 96% concentrate to a 99.95% uncoated SPG (spheronised, purified graphite) which is very near to what is used in the lithium-ion battery as graphite content.

Ultimately Blencowe is seeking offtake contracts and this commercial scale test work is designed to provide the samples and the results to qualify Orom-Cross product for these contracts, which themselves form an integral part of the DFS.

Other work continues within Uganda on infrastructure, community relations, environmental updates and all other key aspects of the DFS, and Blencowe remains working towards end-2024 as the delivery date for the DFS – subject to all necessary funding received to deliver as such.

Specialist technical work has also been underway in this period in the USA, considering the beneficiation of Orom-Cross concentrates to various high end products, up to 99.99% which is military grade.  To date all work has been successful and provided evidence Orom-Cross has one of the most pure concentrates and upgraded products and this will bode well in future offtake discussions.

Despite all of this progress the Company is facing macro-challenges and the UK market remains flat, which has a direct impact on both the share price and market value.  Blencowe will continue to market its achievements and remains positive on the medium and longer term outlook for graphite.  We will continue to build our project and add value as this will ultimately be significant as demand continues to rise, while supply of graphite (particularly high quality) remains static.

We thank our shareholders and other stakeholders for their continued support and we look forward to continuing to kick goals ahead to deliver the DFS and success for the Company.

Mike Ralston

Chief Executive Officer

Responsibility Statement of the Directors in respect of the Interim Report

The Directors are responsible for preparing the Interim Financial Statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations. In addition, the Directors have elected to prepare the Interim Financial Statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRSs”), as adopted by the United Kingdom (“UK”).

The Interim Financial Statements are required to give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and of the profit or loss of the Group for that period.

In preparing these Interim Financial Statements, the Directors are required to:

·    select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

·    present information and make judgements that are reasonable, prudent and provides relevant, comparable and understandable information;

·    provide additional disclosures when compliance with the specific requirements in IFRS is insufficient to enable users to understand the impact of particulars transactions, other events and conditions on the entity’s financial position and financial performance; and

·    make an assessment of the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Directors are responsible for keeping proper accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Group’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time its financial position of the Group to enable them ensure that the financial statements comply with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. They have general responsibility for taking such steps as are reasonably open to them to safeguard the assets of the Group and to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities.

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and Interim Financial Statements.  Legislation governing the preparation and dissemination of Interim Financial Statements may differ from one jurisdiction to another.

We confirm that to the best of our knowledge:

·      the Interim Financial Statements, prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the UK, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group for the period;

·      the Director’s report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the group, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face; and

·    the interim report and financial statements, taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and understandable and provide the information necessary for shareholders to assess the group’s performance, business model and strategy.

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the six month period ended 31 March 2024

6 months ended

31 Mar 2024

6 months ended

31 Mar 2023

12 months ended

30 Sep 2023

(Unaudited)

(Unaudited)

(Audited)

Exploration costs

(23,669)

(16,642)

(53,347)

Administrative fees and other expenses

5

(682,486)

(446,424)

(1,298,872)

Operating loss

(706,155)

(463,066)

(1,352,219)

Finance costs

(19,685)

(23,010)

(45,748)

Loss before tax

(725,840)

(486,076)

(1,397,967)

Income tax

Loss after tax

(725,840)

(486,076)

(1,397,967)

Other comprehensive income

Exchange differences on translation of foreign operation

64,153

7,807

31,282

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

64,153

7,807

31,282

Total comprehensive loss

(661,687)

(478,269)

(1,366,685)

Basic and diluted loss per share (pence)

10

(0.31)

(0.28)

(0.70)

There was no other comprehensive income for the period ended on 31 March 2024.

The accompanying notes on form an integral part of the Interim Financial Statements.

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as at 31 March 2024

As at

31 Mar 2024

As at

31 Mar 2023

As at

30 Sept 2023

(Unaudited)

(Unaudited)

(Audited)

Notes

GBP

GBP

GBP

Non-Current Assets

6

7,061,967

7,065,820

7,604,564

Current assets

Trade and other receivables

7

113,470

135,901

31,863

Cash and cash equivalents

444,991

130,740

129,853

Total current assets

558,461

266,641

161,716

Total assets

7,620,428

7,332,461

7,766,280

Current liabilities

Creditors: Amounts falling due within one year

8

(1,238,944)

(414,843)

(1,076,169)

Total current liabilities

(1,238,944)

(414,843)

(1,076,169)

Non-current liabilities

Surface liabilities

9

(783,549)

(785,520)

(818,915)

Total liabilities

(2,022,493)

(1,200,363)

(1,895,084)

Net assets

5,597,935

6,132,098

5,871,196

Equity

Share capital

12

1,377,801

1,275,066

1,338,566

Share premium

12

8,986,590

8,099,579

8,637,399

Warrants reserves

428,342

402,148

428,342

Translation reserve

94,892

7,264

30,739

Retained earnings

(5,289,690)

(3,651,959)

(4,563,850)

Total equity

5,597,935

6,132,098

5,871,196

 

The accompanying form an integral part of the Interim Financial Statements.

Share capital

Share premium

Share option reserves

Retained earnings

Translation reserve

Total equity

GBP

GBP

GBP

GBP

GBP

GBP

Balance as at 30 Sep 2022

1,181,316

7,480,829

402,148

(3,165,883)

(543)

5,897,867

Total comprehensive loss for 6 months

Loss for the period

(486,076)

(486,076)

Total comprehensive loss

(486,076)

(486,076)

Contributions from equity holders

New shares issued

93,750

656,250

750,000

Share issue costs

(37,500)

(37,500)

Exchange differences on translation

7,807

7,807

Total contributions from equity holders

93,750

618,750

7,807

720,307

Balance as at 31 Mar 2023

1,275,066

8,099,579

402,148

(3,651,959)

7,264

6,132,098

Total comprehensive loss for 6 months

Loss for the period

(911,891)

(911,891)

Total comprehensive loss

(911,891)

(911,891)

Contributions from equity holders

New shares issued

63,500

571,500

635,000

Share issue costs

(33,680)

(33,680)

Warrants reserve

Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

26,194

23,475

49,669

Total contributions from equity holders

63,500

537,820

26,194

23,475

650,989

Balance as at 30 Sep 2023

1,338,566

8,637,399

428,342

(4,563,850)

30,739

5,871,196

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the six month period ended 31 March 2024 

Total comprehensive loss for 6 months

Loss for the period

(725,840)

(725,840)

Total comprehensive loss

(725,840)

(725,840)

Contributions from equity holders

New shares issued

39,235

353,115

392,350

Share issued costs

(3,924)

(3,924)

Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

64,153

64,153

Total contributions from equity holders

39,235

349,191

64,153

452,579

Balance as at 31 Mar 2024

1,377,801

8,986,590

428,342

(5,289,690)

94,892

5,597,935

The accompanying notes on form an integral part of the Interim Financial Statements.

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the six month period ended 31 March 2024

As at

31 Mar 2024

As at

31 Mar 2023

As at

30 Sept 2023

(Unaudited)

(Unaudited)

(Audited)

Notes

GBP

GBP

GBP

Operating activities

Loss after tax

(725,839)

(486,076)

(1,397,967)

Depreciation

104

Finance costs

19,685

23,010

45,748

Adjustment to Surface Liability

Share issue/warrant cost

26,194

Unrealised currency translation

126,864

261,566

182,264

Changes in working capital

Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables

7

(81,607)

(50,054)

53,984

Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables

8

162,775

(39,568)

272,664

Net cash flows from operating activities

(498,122)

(291,018)

(817,113)

Investment activities

Purchase of fixed assets

(748)

Investment in exploration assets

(1,175,345)

(621,988)

(713,848)

Net cash flows from investment activities

(1,175,345)

(622,736)

(713,848)

Financing activities

DFC Government grant

6

1,600,178

Shares issued (net of issue cost)

388,427

697,500

1,313,820

Net cash flows from financing activities

1,988,605

697,500

1,313,820

Increase in cash and short-term deposits

315,138

(216,254)

(217,141)

Cash and short-term deposits brought forward

129,853

346,994

346,994

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

444,991

130,740

129,853

The accompanying notes form an integral part of the Interim Financial Statements.

Notes to the Financial Statements for the six month period ended 31 March 2024

1.   General

Blencowe Resources Plc (the “Company”) is a public limited company incorporated and registered in England and Wales on 18 September 2017 with registered company number 10966847 and its registered office situated in England and Wales at 167-169 Great Portland Street, Fifth Floor, London, England W1W 5PF.

The Group did not earn any trading income during the period under review but incurred expenditure in developing its principal assets.

The Consolidated Interim Financial Statements of the Company for the six month period ended 31 March 2024 comprise the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the “Group”).

2.   Accounting Policies

Basis of preparation

The Interim Financial Statements of the Group are unaudited condensed financial statements for the six month period ended 31 March 2024.

The accounting policies applied by the Group in these Interim Financial Statements, are the same as those applied by the Group in its consolidated financial statements and have been prepared on the basis of the accounting policies applied for the financial year to 30 September 2023 which have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as adopted by UK. The Group Financial Statements have been prepared using the measurement bases specified by IFRS each type of asset, liability, income and expense.

The Group Financial Statements are presented in GBP, which is the Group’s functional currency. All amounts have been rounded to the nearest pound, unless otherwise stated.

Government grants

This is the first reporting period the Group is recognising government grants. Government grants are recognized once the entity has complied with conditions attaching to them and they have been received. Governments grants are accounted for using the capital approach under which a grant is recognized outside the profit and loss. Government grants related to assets, are presented in the statement of financial position by deducting the grant in arriving at the carrying amount of the asset. The grant is recognized in profit or loss over the life of a depreciable asset as a reduced depreciation expense.

Comparative figures

The comparative figures have been presented as the Group Financial Statements cover the 6 month period ended 31 March 2023 and the 12 month period ended 30 September 2023. During 2024, the Group discovered that share premium had been erroneously classified as share capital and administration expenses captured as share issue costs for interim accounts as at 31 March 2023. Refer to Note 12.

3.   Critical accounting estimates and judgments

In preparing the Group’s Interim Financial Statements, the Directors have to make judgments on how to apply the Group’s accounting policies and make estimates about the future. The Directors do not consider there to be any critical judgments that have been made in arriving at the amounts recognised in the Group Financial Statements.

4.   Significant accounting policies

The accounting policies adopted are consistent with those followed in the preparation of the annual financial statements of Blencowe Resources Plc for the year ended 30 September 2023.  A copy of these financial statements is available on the Group website at https://blencoweresourcesplc.com.

5.   Administrative fee and other expenses

6 months ended

 31 Mar 2024

6 months ended

31 Mar 2023

12 Months ended

30 Sep 2023

(Unaudited)

(Unaudited)

(Audited)

GBP

GBP

GBP

Directors’ remuneration

69,857

70,023

140,051

Professional fees

80,001

121,692

226,471

Salaries

75,000

75,000

150,000

Listing fees

20,933

18,218

41,123

Audit fees

33,498

21,644

35,000

Share issue/warrant cost

26,194

Administration fees

23,500

23,500

47,000

Sponsorship

5,690

Broker fees

18,434

20,500

41,000

Travelling expenses

11,034

7,959

16,852

Ugandan taxes

342,751

392,425

Miscellaneous fees

4,445

87,888

72,625

Royalties

1,244

Foreign currency (gain)/loss

(3,901)

110,131

Total

682,486

446,424

1,298,872

The Group had two employees who are key management personnel and three Directors. The Directors and the key management personnel’s remuneration related solely to short term employee benefits.

6.   Non-Current assets

For the period ended 31 March 2024 intangible assets represents capitalised costs associated with the Group’s exploration, evaluation and development of mineral resources net of any Government grants received.

6 months ended

31 Mar 2024

(Unaudited)

GBP

6 months ended

31 Mar 2023

(Unaudited)

GBP

12 months ended

30 Sept 2023

(Audited)

GBP

Exploration assets

8,662,145

7,065,176

7,604,564

Property, Plant and Equipment

644

Grant from US Government (Refer below)

(1,600,178)

Total

7,061,967

7,065,820

7,604,564

The company signed a US$5 million agreement with the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (“DFC”) in order to provide substantial funding for the Orom Cross Definitive Feasibility Study programme, via a Technical Assistance Grant (“TAG”).  The DFC is a proxy for the US Government which funds the organisation and ultimately sets its vision, parameters and funding distribution. DFC payments will be made as agreed feasibility study milestones are achieved. As part of the US$5 million Technical Assistance Grant (“TAG”) the DFC has a right of first refusal on commercial terms to arrange project financing for the Orom-Cross project, which may deliver Blencowe with a full funded solution to bring Orom-Cross into production with support from a major financial institution. The agreement is subject to various events of default.

7.   Trade and other receivables

6 months ended

 31 Mar 2024

6 months ended

31 Mar 2023

12 Months ended

30 Sep 2023

(Unaudited)

(Unaudited)

(Audited)

GBP

GBP

GBP

Other receivables

35,166

21,526

9,421

Prepayments

78,304

114,375

22,442

Total

113,470

135,901

31,863

8.   Creditors: Amounts falling due within one year

6 months ended

 31 Mar 2024

6 months ended

31 Mar 2023

12 Months ended

30 Sep 2023

(Unaudited)

(Unaudited)

(Audited)

GBP

GBP

GBP

Payables

707,912

103,980

644,585

Surface liabilities (Note 9)

143,036

Accruals and provision

194,352

167,827

39,159

Ugandan taxes

336,680

392,425

Total

1,238,944

414,843

1,076,169

9.   Surface liabilities

Blencowe Resources Uganda Limited, the Company’s subsidiary entered into an agreement for surface rights over the land in the mineral area of the licence. The land owners granted Blencowe Resources Uganda Limited a 49 year lease over an area. The liability to the land owners is to be paid in 8 instalments at defined dates with the final payment due in 2035.

6 months ended

 31 Mar 2024

6 months ended

31 Mar 2023

12 Months ended

30 Sep 2023

(Unaudited)

(Unaudited)

(Audited)

GBP

GBP

GBP

Total payable at the beginning of the period

818,915

978,255

978,255

Utilisation

(148,468)

Interest charged during the period

19,685

23,010

45,748

Exchange loss on valuation

(55,051)

(72,709)

(56,620)

Total payable as at period end

783,549

928,556

818,915

Analysis between current and non-current liability

Payable within 12 months

143,036

Payable after 12 months

783,549

785,520

818,915

783,549

928,556

818,915

The value of the lease is measured at the present value of the contractual payments due to the lessor

over the lease term, with the discount rate of 5%.

10. Loss per share

The calculation of the basic and diluted loss per share is based on the following data:

6 months ended

 31 Mar 2024

6 months ended

31 Mar 2023

12 Months ended

30 Sep 2023

(Unaudited)

(Unaudited)

(Audited)

Earnings

GBP

GBP

GBP

Loss from continuing operations for the period attributable to the equity holders of the Group

(661,687)

(478,269)

(1,397,967)

Number of shares

Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares for the purpose of basic and diluted earnings per share

210,540,876

168,803,923

200,041,594

Basic and diluted loss per share (pence)

(0.31)

(0.28)

(0.70)

There are no potentially dilutive shares in issue.

11. Related party transactions

The are no related party transactions during the period except for the Directors’ remuneration, which have been disclosed in note 5.

Sam Quinn is a director and shareholder of the Company and a Director of Lionshead Consultants Limited.  During the period, Lionshead Consultants Limited charged fees for consultancy fees of £18,000 (31 March 2023: £18,000 and 30 Sep 2023: £36,000).

12. Reclassification

During 2024, the Group discovered that share premium had been erroneously classified as share capital and administration expenses captured as share issue costs for interim accounts as at 31 March 2023. These errors has been corrected by restating each of the affected financial statement line items for prior periods. The following table summarises the impact on the Group’s consolidated accounts.

Impact of reclassification

As previously reported

Restatement

As restated

GBP

GBP

GBP

Total assets

7,332,461

7,332,461

Total liabilities

(1,215,363)

15,000

(1,200,363)

Net assets

6,117,098

15,000

6,132,098

Share capital

1,931,316

(656,250)

1,275,066

Share premium

7,428,329

671,250

8,099,579

Warrants reserve

402,148

402,148

Translation reserve

7,264

7,264

Retained earnings

(3,651,959)

(3,651,959)

Total Equity

6,117,098

15,000

6,132,098

There is no material impact on the Group’s basis or diluted earnings per share and no impact on the total operating, investing or financing cashflows for the half year ended 31 March 2023.

13. Events after the reporting date

On 10 April 2024, the Company announced the receipt of its third tranche US$1 million funding from the United States International Development Finance Corporation (“DFC”).  This payment, representing a further 20% of the full US$5 million DFC grant further supports the ongoing Orom-Cross Definitive Feasibility Study (“DFS”) costs, bringing the total received to US$3 million since the agreement was signed in Sept 2023. The DFC is the primary US Government finance institution set up to provide financially sound solutions for private sector initiatives pertaining to critical challenges facing the world.

I would like to receive Brand Communications updates and news...
Free Stock Updates & News
I agree to have my personal information transfered to MailChimp ( more information )
Join over 3.000 visitors who are receiving our newsletter and learn how to optimize your blog for search engines, find free traffic, and monetize your website.
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.