Home » GreenX Metals (GRX)
Category Archives: GreenX Metals (GRX)
#GRX GreenX Metals Ltd – High Grade Antimony Identified at Eleonore North
27th November 2024 / Leave a comment
GreenX Metals Limited (GreenX or the Company) is pleased to announce that high grade antimony mineralisation has been identified at the Company’s Eleonore North project (Eleonore North or ELN) in Greenland, based on historical results recently released by the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS). The historical results indicate the potential for a high-grade antimony-gold mineral system at ELN. Antimony prices have been on a rapid uptrend since China announced antimony export controls from 15 September 2024, with antimony prices in the US having rocketed to US$37,500/t from US$18,300/t1 in the past week.
HIGH GRADE ANTIMONY IDENTIFIED AT ELEONORE NORTH PROJECT
· |
GreenX receives outstanding antimony results at Eleonore North project in Greenland. |
· |
Antimony price now US$37,500/t from historical prices of ~US$5,000 to 10,000/t. |
· |
Critical mineral crisis escalating – China has now restricted export of critical and strategic antimony, graphite, gallium, germanium, tungsten, titanium and rare earths. |
· Historical results from GEUS 2008 fieldwork at ELN have been made available and include grab samples from outcropping mineralised veins with individual specimens grading up to 23% antimony (Sb), and other samples up to 4g/t gold (Au).
· Previously reported historical data confirmed the presence of gold and high-grade antimony in outcropping veins at ELN including:
o 14m long chip sample grading 7.2% Sb and 0.53g/t Au2
o 40 m chip line with a length weighed average of 0.78g/t Au2
· Antimony mineralisation has been identified along a ~4km trend in veins and structures, that broadly aligns with previously identified gold veining at surface within a 15km trend.
Figure 1: Newly released GEUS assay results show evidence for high-grade antimony and gold mineralisation above the interpreted Noa Pluton.
· Significantly, GEUS geologist’s identified stibnite (Sb2S3) as the antimony mineral. Stibnite is well-understood and the predominant ore mineral for commercial antimony production.
· Antimony is designated a Critical Raw Material by both the EU and the US, with China being the world’s major antimony ore producer and major exporter of refined antimony oxides and metallic antimony.
· Global strategic interest in antimony has significantly increased in 2024 due to several factors:
o China controls ~50% of global antimony mining, most downstream processing and 32% of global resources according to the Lowy Institute.
o China’s recent export ban on antimony, effective from 15 September 2024, has caused market disruption3.
o Antimony is a crucial material in the defence supply chain, used in various military applications including ammunition, flame retardants, and smart weaponry.
o Antimony is essential in renewable energy technologies including more-energy-efficient solar panel glass and in preventing thermal runaway in batteries.
· The antimony market is expected to grow by 65% between 2024 and 20324. However, the supply side, declining antimony grades and depleting resources for existing mines are becoming increasingly relevant.
o In terms of new deposits, antimony is harder to find than most metals because stibnite has no geophysical electrical or magnetic response
· To aid the Company’s exploration targeting and fieldwork planning for ELN, GreenX’s technical team intend to locate, analyse, and study further historical samples and data within GEUS’s archives in the coming weeks.
GreenX Metals’ Chief Executive Officer, Mr Ben Stoikovich, commented: “Antimony is of critical importance in multiple defence applications and for the energy transition. Antimony features on both the EU and US critical raw materials lists due to China’s dominance of global antimony supply. Whilst we had previously focussed on the ELN project primarily for gold mineralisation, the newly published historical results with out-cropping vein samples grading up to 23% antimony, indicate the potential for ELN to host viable antimony mineralisation. We plan to now re-focus our exploration program at ELN on both gold and antimony targets.“
The Announcement Contains Inside Information
Figure 2: Noa Pluton prospect area within the Eleonore North Licence.
ANTIMONY RESULTS FROM NEWLY PUBLISHED GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ARCHIVE MATERIAL
GEUS’s archives host an extensive collection of rock samples (with and without assays), maps, as well as government and company reports going back many decades. A sub-set of the archive material is available in digital format. GEUS is continuously digitising and publishing its archive material. The newly released data covers 2008 field work at the Noa Dal valley within the Company’s ELN project. Government geologists collected mineralised samples from outcropping veins and scree near to the interpreted Noa Pluton. Selected highlights are presented in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Selected antimony and gold results from 2008 GEUS fieldwork |
|||
Sample # |
Sb (%) |
Au (g/t) |
Field description |
469506 |
23.40 |
0.00 |
Quartz vein with stibnite. Sample from boulder or scree |
496901 |
22.20 |
0.44 |
Massive stibnite from mineralised zone |
496918 |
15.10 |
0.54 |
Quartz vein + galena + chalcopyrite |
469504 |
6.65 |
0.83 |
Shale with stibnite |
496912 |
0.10 |
4.10 |
Clay alteration: hanging wall |
496904 |
0.11 |
4.70 |
Clay alteration: footwall |
496910 |
0.04 |
2.20 |
Intense clay alteration |
These newly released results conform with previously released historical results from the Noa Dal area (previously reported in ASX announcement dated 10 July 2023).
GEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF ANTIMONY
GreenX is targeting Reduced Intrusion-related Gold Systems (RIRGS) at ELN. The hypothesised blind-to-the-surface Noa Pluton forms the basis for the RIRGS exploration model. Antimony-gold veins at surface were considered to be supporting evidence for RIRGS at ELN. With the favourable shift in the antimony market, the outcropping veins have become a potentially viable and attractive target.
The antimony-gold mineralisation at ELN could be analogous to Perpetua Resources’ Stibnite Gold Project in Idaho, USA. There, RIRGS and orogenic gold mineralisation styles overprint each other. Prior to the RIRGS model at ELN, the gold-bearing veins at Noa Dal were thought to be of orogenic origin. It is relatively common in gold deposits which are proximal to intrusions to feature characteristics of RIRGS and orogenic gold mineralisation styles.
The scale and potential of the antimony-gold veins will be evaluated with a follow-up investigation in the next phase of fieldwork.
GEUS is in the process of releasing results from regional mapping and sampling surveys from field seasons in 2022 and 2023 across East Greenland. GreenX plans to use the soon-to-be-released data as part of ongoing evaluation of the antimony and gold potential at ELN and the region.
Given recent developments in the antimony market, GreenX’s exploration strategy at the ELN project in East Greenland will continue with a renewed focus on the known Sb-Au mineral systems at the Noa pluton.
ENQUIRIES
Ben Stoikovich Sapan Ghai
Chief Executive Officer Business Development
+44 207 478 3900 +44 207 478 3900
-ENDS-
COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENT
Information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr Joel Burkin, a Competent Person who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Burkin is a consultant engaged by GreenX. Mr Burkin has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Burkin consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This release may include forward-looking statements, which may be identified by words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, “plans”, and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on GreenX’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of GreenX, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. GreenX makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.
The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (‘MAR’). Upon the publication of this announcement via Regulatory Information Service (‘RIS’), this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.
Sources:
1 Source: SP Angel 22/11/24 & Asianmetals.com
2 Previously reported – refer to ASX announcement dated 10 July 2023
3 https://chemical.chemlinked.com/news/chemical-news/china-restricts-export-of-antimony-and-related-products
4 https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/antimony-market-104295
Appendix 1: Exploration results and JORC Tables
Table 1: Historical GEUS rock samples from 2008
Sample ID |
Easting |
Northing |
Sb (ppm) |
Au (g/t) |
Field Description |
469501 |
-25.0093 |
73.29184 |
85,100 |
0 |
Silicified quartzite with stibnite |
469502 |
-25.0078 |
73.29173 |
39,600 |
0.55 |
Silicified quartzite with stibnite |
469503 |
-25.0054 |
73.29182 |
96,500 |
0 |
Silicified quartzite with stibnite |
469504 |
-24.9471 |
73.2908 |
66,500 |
0.83 |
Shale with stibnite |
469505 |
-25.0675 |
73.30148 |
129,000 |
0 |
Quartzite with stibnite |
469506 |
-25.0675 |
73.30148 |
234,000 |
0 |
Vein quartz with stibnite, Sample from boulder or scree |
469507 |
-25.0669 |
73.30519 |
987 |
Vein quartz with galena and chalcopyrite |
|
469508 |
-24.925 |
73.29301 |
577 |
Silicified limestone breccia |
|
496901 |
-25.0063 |
73.29178 |
222,000 |
0.44 |
Massive stibnite from mineralised zone |
496902 |
-25.0063 |
73.29178 |
50,900 |
0 |
Quartzite breccia + stibnite |
496903 |
-25.0015 |
73.28947 |
274 |
Footwall quartzite |
|
496904 |
-25.0064 |
73.29182 |
1,130 |
4.7 |
Clay alteration: footwall |
496905 |
-25.0063 |
73.29178 |
451 |
1.1 |
Clay alteration: footwall |
496906 |
-25.0063 |
73.29178 |
184 |
0.07 |
Quartzite breccia |
496907 |
-25.0062 |
73.29173 |
62 |
0 |
Quartzite breccia + stibnite |
496908 |
-25.0061 |
73.29168 |
78 |
2 |
Stibnite-rich breccia + heavy alteration |
496909 |
-25.0062 |
73.29166 |
143 |
2.4 |
Clay alteration: hanging wall |
496910 |
-25.0064 |
73.29171 |
383 |
2.2 |
Intense clay alteration: hanging wall |
496911 |
-25.0065 |
73.29166 |
58 |
0.18 |
Quartzite hanging wall |
496912 |
-25.0075 |
73.29166 |
1,080 |
4.1 |
Clay alteration: hanging wall |
496913 |
-24.9465 |
73.29073 |
1,180 |
4 |
Quartzite breccia + alteration |
496914 |
-24.9471 |
73.29088 |
267 |
0.28 |
Quartzite breccia + quartz-veining |
496915 |
-24.947 |
73.29084 |
65,100 |
0.66 |
Quartzite breccia + stibnite |
496916 |
-24.9474 |
73.29085 |
63,700 |
0.65 |
Wall rock quartzite |
496917 |
-25.0657 |
73.30175 |
10,000 |
Stibnite-rich breccia in quartzite. Sample from boulder or scree |
|
496918 |
-25.0658 |
73.30178 |
151,000 |
0.54 |
Quartz-vein + galena + chalcopyrite |
Note: Coordinates are in WGS 84 decimal degree format.
10,000ppm = 1%
JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 Report
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
Sampling techniques |
Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. |
GEUS collected grab samples of in situ and loose rocks. |
|
Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. |
No QAQC was reported. |
|
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. |
Work was not conducted to modern industry standards. |
Drilling techniques |
Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). |
N/A |
Drill sample recovery |
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.
|
N/A |
|
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. |
N/A |
|
Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. |
N/A |
Logging |
Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. |
Rock grab samples were described in the field and are not used in any estimates or studies. |
|
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. |
The logging of rock grab samples was qualitative/descriptive in nature. If photos of the samples exist, they have not been released by GEUS. |
|
The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. |
N/A |
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation |
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. |
N/A |
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. |
N/A |
|
For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. |
N/A |
|
|
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. |
N/A
|
|
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. |
N/A |
|
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. |
N/A |
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. |
All samples are historical in nature and do not comply with modern QAQC protocols. |
|
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. |
N/A |
|
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. |
N/A |
Verification of sampling and assaying |
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.
|
No verification carried out. |
|
The use of twinned holes. |
N/A |
|
Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. |
N/A |
|
Discuss any adjustment to assay data. |
N/A |
Location of data points |
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. |
Location of samples was collected with a handheld GPS unit. No Mineral Resource estimate is given. |
|
Specification of the grid system used. |
Location data is provided in the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84) in decimal degrees. |
|
Quality and adequacy of topographic control. |
N/A |
Data spacing and distribution |
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. |
The samples GEUS collected in 2008 are select rock grab samples. They did not attempt to collect data at regular spacings. |
|
Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. |
N/A |
|
Whether sample compositing has been applied. |
N/A |
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure |
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. |
The grab samples are point data and were likely collected biased to visible mineralisation. They were collected within and adjacent to mineralised veins and fault structures. |
|
If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. |
No sampling bias. |
Sample security |
The measures taken to ensure sample security. |
The practices of GEUS in 2008 are unknown to GreenX, but are not considered material for the present potential of Eleonore North. |
Audits or reviews |
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. |
GreenX is unaware if any audits or reviews were performed but has no concerns about their absence. |
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
|
Mineral tenement and land tenure status |
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. |
The Eleonore North Project is a result of a scientific and systematic reduction of Greenfield Exploration’s (GEX) ‘Frontier’ Project. Eleonore North comprises two Exploration Licences (MEL2023-39 and MEL 2018-19). The combined spatial area of licences is 1,220.81 km2. The boundaries of Eleonore North Project are defined by the points:
MEL2023-39 (two polygons: 1,189.77 km2) 73.98333 °N 25.30000 °W 73.98333 °N 25.13333 °W 73.95000 °N 25.13333 °W 73.95000 °N 25.01667 °W 73.91667 °N 25.01667 °W 73.91667 °N 24.86667 °W 73.88333 °N 24.86667 °W 73.88333 °N 24.51667 °W 73.86667 °N 24.51667 °W 73.86667 °N 24.48333 °W 73.85000 °N 24.48333 °W 73.85000 °N 24.43333 °W 73.70000 °N 24.43333 °W 73.70000 °N 24.48333 °W 73.68333 °N 24.48333 °W 73.68333 °N 25.01667 °W 73.70000 °N 25.01667 °W 73.70000 °N 25.05000 °W 73.71667 °N 25.05000 °W 73.71667 °N 25.08333 °W 73.73333 °N 25.08333 °W 73.73333 °N 25.21667 °W 73.75000 °N 25.21667 °W 73.75000 °N 25.26667 °W 73.76667 °N 25.26667 °W 73.76667 °N 25.33333 °W 73.78333 °N 25.33333 °W 73.78333 °N 25.38333 °W 73.80000 °N 25.38333 °W 73.80000 °N 25.48333 °W 73.91667 °N 25.48333 °W 73.91667 °N 25.25000 °W 73.95000 °N 25.25000 °W 73.95000 °N 25.30000 °W
73.41667 °N 25.31667 °W 73.41667 °N 25.03333 °W 73.43333 °N 25.03333 °W 73.43333 °N 24.60000 °W 73.23333 °N 24.60000 °W 73.23333 °N 25.60000 °W 73.26667 °N 25.60000 °W 73.26667 °N 25.53333 °W 73.30000 °N 25.53333 °W 73.30000 °N 25.45000 °W 73.31667 °N 25.45000 °W 73.31667 °N 25.31667 °W
MEL 2018-19 (two polygons: 31.04 km2) 73.16667 °N 25.11667 °W 73.16667 °N 25.01667 °W 73.15000 °N 25.01667 °W 73.15000 °N 25.05000 °W 73.13333 °N 25.05000 °W 73.13333 °N 25.15000 °W 73.15000 °N 25.15000 °W 73.15000 °N 25.11667 °W
73.23333 °N 25.05000 °W 73.23333 °N 24.76667 °W 73.21667 °N 24.76667 °W 73.21667 °N 25.01667 °W 73.20000 °N 25.01667 °W 73.20000 °N 25.05000 °W The licences are currently in credit due to previous expenditure. Expenditure above the minimum regulatory requirement is carried forward for a maximum of three years. Eleonore North is in good standing and GreenX owns 100% of the licences following conclusion of a revised option agreement as announced on 15 July 2024..
GreenX will issue a 1.5% NSR for Eleonore North. |
|
|
The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. |
The licences are in good standing. |
|
Exploration done by other parties |
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. |
1953 – lead, copper and zinc bearing veins were discovered in Noa Valley as part of a regional mapping program by Nordisk Mineselskab A/G (‘Nordisk’).
1974 – 1976: Nordisk mapped the Holmesø copper-antimony prospect in Brogetdal, Strindbergland. Geophysical surveying was performed. The outcropping mineralisation was blasted a 100kg bulk sample was retrieved, of which 35kg was sent for analysis. Finally, an attempt was made to drill the mineralisation, and only the top 1.4m of a targeted 17m mineralised horizon was sampled before the rig broke down. Nordisk concluded that the Holmesø mineralisation is epigenetic.
1981 – 1983: Nordisk discovered the two small, high-grade tungsten and antimony-tungsten deposits on Ymer Island. These are respectively known as South Margeries Dal and North Margeries Dal. These deposits were drilled Historical Estimates were made. Economic studies were performed but concluded that more mineralised material was needed. The drilled mineralisation is open at depth and along strike. The historical work on the tungsten and antimony is not material to the understanding of the project’s gold potential.
1984 – 1986: As part of Nordisk’s search for more tungsten mineralisation, a large gold bearing vein was discovered in the southern cliff face of Noa Valley. The mineralisation in the scree was sampled. Geochemical sampling was also performed which identified a 10 to 15 km long multielement anomaly dominated by arsenic and antimony, which have a positive correlation with gold. Nordisk had a strategic shift towards petroleum exploration after this point in time.
1992: With the demise of Nordisk in 1991, the Greenland state owned enterprise, NunaOil A/S in collaboration with Australia’s Pasminco Ltd did additional sampling of the Noa gold veins. The program was successful in finding additional veins in the valley floor and extending the known mineralisation. However, the corporate mandate was for ‘high grade gold’ which it was unsuccessful in locating. This result is unsurprising given that the veins are above the hornfels and correspondingly yield high-grade antimony and low-gold content. GEX expects the gold content to increase, and antimony to decrease at depth towards the causative pluton.
2008 – 2009: GEUS visited Ymer Island and took various rock grab samples in the Noa Dal area. Assay results from these samples were recently made publicly available on the Greenland Portal.
2009: NunaMinerals A/S, a public-private spinout from NunaOil A/S, conducted a heliborne magnetic survey over Margeries Valley and Noa Valley. The purpose of this survey was to directly detect tungsten, and antimony deposits. Neither of the known deposits were detectable using this method, however a distinct circular magnetic feature was identified in Noa Valley. This magnetic feature was interpreted to be a granitic/intermediate intrusion. During this time, samples from the South Margeries Dal deposit were sent for metallurgical analysis, which determined that the material was potentially suited to direct-shipping-ore, and amendable to basic beneficiation methods.
2011: Avannaa Resources Ltd (‘Avannaa’) conducted a basin-wide helicopter supported reconnaissance program. This included visits to the Holmesø mineralisation. Avannaa concluded that the Holmesø mineralisation was epigenetic and likely related to the mineralisation observed on Ymer Island.
2018-2019: Independence Group Ltd (subsequently rebranded as IGO Ltd (‘IGO’) through a joint-venture agreement with GEX, conducted three field programs that were focussed on the sedimentary-hosted copper deposit model. During this time, IGO managed all geological aspects of the program while GEX managed the logistics in 2018 and 2019. IGO visited Noa Valley in 2018 and 2019 but focussed on the north slope away from Noa Pluton, and on areas typified by magnetic highs rather than the lows which define Noa Pluton’s circular magnetic signature. Despite this, quartzite mineralisation reminiscent of Holmesø was identified but no mineralogy is recorded in the documentation. While in the field with IGO in 2019, GEX alerted IGO to the presence of antimony and gold in the south side of the valley, but no commensurate sampling was performed. During the IGO earn-in period, GEX located the historical drillhole collars at North and South Margeries Dal tungsten/antimony deposits.
The Holmesø prospect was visited by IGO in 2018, 2019 and 2022. IGO’s Holmesø sampling did not replicate Nordisk’s high-grade blast/bulk sample, or the drill results. Regional sampling identified diagenetic copper, as well as remobilised epigentic copper that expresses as course blebs of chalcocite within porous, bed-cutting, vuggy conduits.
2022: IGO conducted a structural and geochemical sampling program in Strindbergland (no activity on Ymer Island). This program correctly concluded that the ‘sediment-hosted copper deposit model’ is not a suitable analogy. IGO returned to GEX the licences that were in good standing, with the indebted licences being relinquished by IGO. The remaining licences became the ‘Eleonore North’ project, which is a subset of the original ‘Frontier’ project area.
2023: In May, GEX installed an array of passive seismic nodes on Ymer Island within the licence area. Passive seismic nodes record ambient noise in the crust and accumulate data over many weeks. In September 2023, GEX collected the nodes from Ymer Island. The nodes were returned to the Institute of Mine Seismology (IMS) for data download and processing. IMS produced a 3D velocity model. |
|
Geology |
Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. |
Eleonore North licences, for the most part, cover Neoproterozoic-aged sediments belonging to the Eleonore Bay Supergroup. These sediments trend from clastics up to carbonates. The lithology of the sediments is not a primary consideration in the targeting of reduced intrusion related gold systems. These sediments are intruded by granites and intermediate intrusives that are somewhat shallowly sourced due the Caledonian Orogenic event. However, geochronology of the South Margeries Dal tungsten indicates that post-orogenic fluid flow occurred. Post-orogenic granitic intrusions are consistent with RIRGS mineralisation, as the decompression allows for the fluidisation of gold in the mantle while providing conduits to surface. Elsewhere, such post-orogenic emplacement is associated with deeply sourced lamprophyres, like those mapped in Noa Valley and Brogetdal. GEX identified for the first time, that ~373 Ma post-orogenic mineralisation event is related to the 385 Ma Kiffaanngissuseq hydrothermal event some 1,000 km to the north. In the north at Kiffaanngissuseq the post-orogenic event was characterised by an east-west fluid flow. In the south in the Frontier region that hosts Elenore North, the post orogenic event was dominated by magmatic intrusions and little hydrothermal activity. Separating the two areas is the poorly understood, high-metamorphic grade Eclogite Province where peak metamorphism is of similar age to the Frontier and Kiffaanngissuseq processes. |
|
Drill hole Information |
A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: easting and northing of the drill hole collar elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar dip and azimuth of the hole down hole length and interception depth hole length. |
No drilling is reported with these results. |
|
|
If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. |
No information was excluded from the announcement. |
|
Data aggregation methods |
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. |
No data aggregation has been undertaken. |
|
|
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. |
No data aggregation has been undertaken. |
|
|
The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. |
No metal equivalent results have been reported. |
|
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths |
These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. |
No drilling is reported with these results. The reported results are grab samples from within or adjacent to mineralised veins and structures. They do not characterise the geometry of the mineralisation. |
|
|
If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). |
N/A |
|
Diagrams |
Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. |
Appropriate maps and tables are included in the main body of this announcement. |
|
Balanced reporting |
Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. |
All results are reported in Appendix 1: Table 1. |
|
Other substantive exploration data |
Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. |
All substantive data are reported. |
|
Further work |
The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). |
In Noa Valley, the target pluton(s) is constrained by seismic, magnetic and geochemical data. The depth to the pluton is thought to be around 150m below surface based on the seismic results. Field confirmation of potential host structures is warranted ahead of a subsequent drilling program. Future fieldwork will be planned and/or undertaken in conjunction with expert consultant(s).
At the South and North Margeries Dal prospects, a higher resolution digital terrain model should be obtained prior to generating Exploration Targets based on the historical drilling.
Bulk sampling at the prospects will also be considered. |
|
|
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. |
These diagrams are included in the main body of this release. |
|
GreenX Metals #GRX – Results of Annual General Meeting
22nd November 2024 / Leave a comment
GreenX Metals Limited (GreenX or the Company) advises, that the 2024 Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the Company was held today, 22 November 2024, at 2.00pm (AWST).
The resolutions voted on were in accordance with the Notice of AGM previously advised to shareholders.
All resolutions were decided on and carried by way of a poll.
In accordance with Section 251AA of the Corporations Act 2001 and ASX Listing Rule 3.13.2, the details of the poll and the proxies received in respect of each resolution are set out below.
For further information please contact:
Dylan Browne
Company Secretary
+61 8 9322 6322
Resolution |
Number of Proxy Votes |
Number of Votes cast on the Poll |
Result |
|||||
For |
Against |
Abstain |
Proxy’s Discretion |
For |
Against |
Abstain |
||
1. Remuneration Report |
3,447,362 |
25,000 |
14,585,000 |
43 |
3,609,905 |
25,000 |
14,585,000 |
Carried on vote by poll |
2. Re-election ofDirector – Mr Mark Pearce |
18,022,362 |
25,000 |
10,000 |
43 |
18,184,905 |
25,000 |
10,000 |
Carried on vote by poll |
3. Re-election of Director – Mr Gary Hemming |
18,022,362 |
25,000 |
10,000 |
43 |
18,184,905 |
25,000 |
10,000 |
Carried on vote by poll |
4. Renewal of Employee Incentive Plan |
17,957,362 |
25,000 |
75,000 |
43 |
18,184,905 |
25,000 |
75,000 |
Carried on vote by poll |
5. Approval of Additional 10% Placement Capacity |
18,022,362 |
25,000 |
10,000 |
43 |
18,034,905 |
175,000 |
10,000 |
Carried on vote by poll |
#GRX GreenX Metals Ltd – Update on Arbitration Award against Poland
11th November 2024 / Leave a comment
GreenX Metals Limited (GreenX, Claimant or Company) provides the following update on the international arbitration claims (Claim) against the Republic of Poland (Poland or Respondent) under both the Australia-Poland Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) and the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) (together the Treaties).
· |
On 7 October 2024, GreenX was awarded £252 million (A$495 million/PLN 1.3 billion) in compensation and interest after the Tribunal unanimously held that Poland breached its obligations under the Treaties |
· |
Poland has now lodged a request to set-aside the BIT award, seeking to have it set-aside on the basis of jurisdictional aspects of the award and procedural unfairness |
· |
GreenX notes that the Polish Prime Minister, Mr Donald Tusk, recently stated at a press conference that: |
|
“The case is rather hopeless, because a lost arbitration is a lost arbitration. We have two big cases on our shoulders. The PiS government blew this issue. |
|
The Australians, as you know, were promised that their mine would be built there. For years they were misled and later the commitment was withdrawn. It was quite obvious that they would go to arbitration, and it was rather obvious that they would win this arbitration. |
|
Speaking frankly, I would most likely, and I cannot exclude that it will go this way, to find the person directly responsible for Poland now having to pay well over a billion zloty if we do not find a legal solution – which I think has very little probability to set aside the award in this arbitration. So, speaking the truth, I will expect my officers to inform the public in the coming days who made a decision or refrained from making a decision with the consequence of these gigantic losses, that is the compensation that we as the Polish State must pay to the Australians.” 1 |
· |
The threshold to succeed on a set-aside motion is very high with vast majority of cases being rejected and interest continuing to accrue at approximately 6% per annum (at today’s rates) whilst the set-aside motion is heard |
· |
GreenX is well funded to defend the annulment with over A$5.5 million in cash reserves |
The Announcement Contains Inside Information
GreenX advises that Poland has lodged a request to set-aside the award with the courts of England and Wales in relation to the BIT claim. Poland is challenging jurisdictional aspects of the award and alleging procedural unfairness, including in the Tribunal’s decision on damages.
The award can only be set aside under very limited circumstances which relate to a lack of jurisdiction on the part of the Tribunal or serious irregularities (such as procedural unfairness). These proceedings do not allow the courts to re-examine the Tribunal’s decision on the merits of the case.
The threshold to succeed on a set aside motion in the English domestic court is very high, with the courts rejecting set-aside applications in the vast majority of cases.
Commenting on Poland’s request to have the BIT award set aside, GreenX Chief Executive Officer, Mr Ben Stoikovich said “Whilst Poland’s actions of lodging a request for a set-aside of the award are not surprising, we note the recent comments made by the new Polish Prime Minister, Mr Tusk, and welcome the opportunity to settle this dispute which will allow both parties to put this unfortunate episode behind us. The Board of GreenX remains committed to obtaining payment of the award and returning capital to shareholders.”
The Claim was brought under the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Rules (UNCITRAL) and the award is final and binding on the parties. The UNCITRAL Rules do not provide for an appeal procedure i.e., they grant no explicit authority to a panel to reconsider its award. However, either party may ask the Tribunal to correct any computational, clerical or typographical errors in the award, issue an interpretation of the award or render an additional award on any claims omitted from the final award. These procedures do not allow either party to request that the Tribunal reconsider the merits of its decision. As part of its filings, Poland is seeking a correction in the computation of damages for the awards.
The Company expects that Poland will also apply to set-aside the award in relation to the ECT claim in due course and it will continue to update the market, if required, in line with its continuous disclosure requirements.
ENQUIRIES
Ben Stoikovich Chief Executive Officer +44 207 478 3900
|
FURTHER DETAILS of THE SUCCESSFUL ARBITRATION AWARDs
In October 2024, GreenX reported a successful outcome of the Claim against Poland under both the BIT and the ECT with the Company being awarded:
· approximately £252m (A$495m / PLN1.3bn) in compensation by the Tribunal under the BIT (BIT Award) which includes interest compounded at SONIA plus one percentage point (+1%) compounded annually from 31 December 2019 to the date of the award (7 October 2024). Interest will continue to accrue at SONIA +1% compounded annually until full and final payment by the Respondent.
· approximately £183m (A$360m / PLN 950m) in compensation by the Tribunal under the ECT (ECT Award), which includes interest compounded at the SONIA overnight rate +1% compounded annually from 31 December 2019. Interest will continue to accrue at SONIA +1% compounded annually until full and final payment by the Respondent.
· Interest continues to accrue at approximately 6% per annum based on today’s rates (Sterling Over-Night Interest rate (SONIA) plus 1%) until full and final satisfaction of the award by Poland.
· Interest of approximately £1m (A$2m / PLN5.2m) has accrued since the award was made.
· Both Awards are subject to any payments made by the Respondent to the Claimant in the other arbitration such that the Claimant is not entitled to double compensation i.e., any amount paid by Poland in one arbitration (i.e., ECT) is set off against Poland’s liability in the other arbitration (i.e., BIT).
The compensation is denominated in British pound sterling. No hedging is in place for the compensation and accordingly is subject to fluctuations in foreign currency.
Each party was ordered to cover its own legal fees, expenses and arbitration costs in relation to the Claim, which in respect of GreenX are costs that have already been fully paid under the Litigation Funding Agreement (LFA) with specialist arbitration funder LCM Funding UK Limited (a subsidiary of Litigation Capital Management Ltd) (LCM).
The Tribunal unanimously held that Poland had breached its obligations under the Treaties in relation to the Jan Karski project, entitling GreenX to compensation. In respect of the Dębieńsko project, the Tribunal did not uphold the Claim under the Treaties.
All of GreenX’s costs associated with the arbitration were funded on a limited basis from LCM. To date, GreenX has drawn down US$11.2 million (A$16.2 million at 30 September 2024) (Outstanding Funding) from the LFA.
In accordance with the terms of the LFA, once the compensation is received, LCM is entitled to be paid the Outstanding Funding, a multiple of five times the Outstanding Funding (based on the period since entering into the LFA) and from 1 January 2025, interest on the Outstanding Funding at a rate of 30% per annum, compounding monthly.
Net of the payments to LCM, GreenX will pay 6% of the balance to key management directly involved in the case (as previously approved by shareholders on 20 January 2021) and 3% to key legal advisers who assisted with the case on a reduced and fixed fee.
Upon satisfaction of the award, it is GreenX’s intention to return the majority of the available cash to shareholders in a timely fashion, after payment of the above costs of the arbitration and applicable taxes (if any).
Forward Looking Statements
This release may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on GreenX’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of GreenX, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. GreenX makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.
The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (‘MAR’). Upon the publication of this announcement via Regulatory Information Service (‘RIS’), this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.
Alan Green covers GreenX Metals #GRX, Kazera Global #KZG & Georgina Energy #GEX on this week’s Stockbox Research Talks
20th October 2024 / Leave a comment
Alan Green covers GreenX Metals #GRX, Kazera Global #KZG & Georgina Energy #GEX on this week’s Stockbox Research Talks
#GRX GreenX Metals LTD – Notice of AGM
18th October 2024 / Leave a comment
GreenX Metals Limited (GreenX or the Company) advises that its Annual General Meeting (Meeting) will be held on Wednesday, 22 November 2024 at 2:00pm (AWST) at the Conference Room, Ground Floor, 28 The Esplanade, Perth, Western Australia 6000.
In accordance with 110D of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the Company will not be dispatching physical copies of the Notice of Meeting (unless a shareholder has elected to receive documents in hard copy in accordance with the timeframe specified in section 110E(8) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)).
A copy of the Notice of Meeting can be viewed and downloaded online as follows:
· |
the Company’s website: https://greenxmetals.com/investors/announcements/. |
· |
the Company’s ASX Market announcements page at www.asx.com.au under the Company’s ASX code “GRX”; or |
· |
if you have provided an email address and have elected to receive electronic communications from the Company, you will receive an email to your nominated email address with a link to an electronic copy of the Notice of Meeting. |
The Company intends to hold a physical meeting. The Company will notify shareholders of any changes to this by way of an announcement and the details will also be made available on our website.
The Notice of Meeting is important and should be read in its entirety. If you are in doubt as to the course of action you should follow, you should consult your stock broker, investment advisor, accountant, solicitor or other professional adviser.
You may also, prior to the Meeting, obtain a paper copy of the Notice of Meeting (free of charge) by contacting the Company Secretary on +61 8 9322 6322 or by sending an email to info@greenxmetals.com.
Holders of Depositary Interests should complete and sign a separate Form of Instruction and return it by the time and in accordance with the instructions set out in the Form of Instruction. Holders on the Warsaw Stock Exchange should contact their brokers to submit their vote for the Meeting. Holders of Depositary Interests and holders on the Warsaw Stock Exchange will not be eligible to vote in person at the Meeting.
How do I update my communications preferences?
Shareholders can still elect to receive some or all of their communications in physical or electronic form or elect not to receive certain documents such as annual reports. To review your communications preferences, or sign up to receive your shareholder communications via email, please update your communication preferences with Computershare at https://www-au.computershare.com/Investor/#Home or contact your broker.
ISSUE OF SHARES
GreenX Metals Limited (GreenX or the Company) has today issued 382,636 ordinary fully paid shares (of no par value) (Shares) following completion of the amended option agreement for the Eleonore North gold project in Greenland (refer to company announcement dated 15 July 2024 for further details).
An application will be made for admission of the Shares to the standard listing segment of the Official List of the FCA (Official List) and to trading on the main market of the London Stock Exchange for listed securities (LSE Admission). LSE Admission is expected to take place on or around 25 October 2024.
For the purposes of the Financial Conduct Authority’s Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTRs), following LSE Admission, the Company’s issued ordinary share capital will be 279,883,668 ordinary shares. The above figure of 279,883,668 may be used by shareholders as the denominator for the calculations by which they can determine if they are required to notify their interest in, or a change to their interest in, the Company following LSE Admission.
Following the issue of Shares, GreenX has the following securities on issue:
· |
279,883,668 ordinary fully paid shares; |
· |
4,775,000 unlisted options exercisable at A$0.45 each on or before 30 November 2025; |
· |
5,525,000 unlisted options exercisable at A$0.55 each on or before 30 November 2026; and |
· |
11,00,000 performance rights that have an expiry date of 8 October 2026. |
Enquiries:
GreenX Metals Limited |
Tel: +61 8 9322 6322 |
Dylan Browne, Company Secretary |
Email: info@greenxmetals.com |
#GRX GreenX Metals LTD – Quarterly Activities Report September 2024
17th October 2024 / Leave a comment
GreenX Metals Limited (ASX:GRX, LSE:GRX) (GreenX or the Company) is pleased to present its Quarterly Activities Report for the period during and subsequent to 30 September 2024.
HIGHLIGHTS
· Arbitration Award
o Subsequent to the quarter end, GreenX was awarded A$490 million in compensation and interest from the successful outcome of the international arbitration claims against the Republic of Poland under both the Australia-Poland Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) and the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT).
o Upon satisfaction of the award, it is GreenX’s intention to return the majority of the available cash to shareholders in a timely fashion, after payment of funding and claim related costs of the arbitration and applicable taxes (if any)
· Tannenberg Copper Project
o In August 2024, GreenX entered into a earn-in agreement to earn up to 90% in the Tannenberg Copper Project (Tannenberg) which is a highly prospective sediment-hosted (Kupferschiefer type) copper deposit in Germany.
o The Tannenberg exploration licence covers 272 km2 in the State of Hesse in central Germany, encompassing the historical “Richelsdorf” copper – silver mines.
· Eleonore North Gold Project
o In July 2024, GreenX entered into a revised agreement to acquire 100% of the Eleonore North Gold Project (Eleonore North) located in eastern Greenland.
o Eleonore North has the potential to host a “reduced intrusion-related gold system” (RIRGS) analogous to large bulk-tonnage deposit types found in Canada.
Commenting on the outcome of the Claim, GreenX CEO Mr Ben Stoikovich said “Having received the Tribunal’s decision, management is now focused on satisfaction of the award and maximising the return of capital by GreenX to its shareholders.
The award of A$490 million will continue to accrue interest at approximately 6% per annum based on today’s rates (Sterling Over-Night Interest rate (SONIA) plus 1%) until full and final satisfaction of the award by Poland.
Looking ahead, we view GreenX’s future with great optimism and in conjunction with maximising the return of capital to GreenX shareholders, we remain dedicated to advancing our copper and gold projects in Germany and Greenland. We will continue to update the market regarding the award and legal proceedings in line with the Company’s continuous disclosure requirements.“
SUCCESSFUL ARBITRATION OUTCOME IN DISPUTE WITH POLISH GOVERNMENT
Subsequent to the quarter, GreenX reported a successful outcome of the international arbitration claims (Claim) against Republic of Poland (Poland or Respondent) under both the BIT and the ECT (together the Treaties).
The Company has been awarded:
· approximately £252m (A$490m / PLN1.3bn) in compensation by the Tribunal under the BIT (BIT Award) which includes interest compounded at SONIA plus one percentage point (+1%) compounded annually from 31 December 2019 to the date of the award (7 October 2024). Interest will continue to accrue at SONIA +1% compounded annually until full and final payment by the Respondent.
· approximately £183m (A$355m / PLN 941m) in compensation by the Tribunal under the ECT (ECT Award), which includes interest compounded at the SONIA overnight rate +1% compounded annually from 31 December 2019. Interest will continue to accrue at SONIA +1% compounded annually until full and final payment by the Respondent.
· Both Awards are subject to any payments made by the Respondent to the Claimant in the other arbitration such that the Claimant is not entitled to double compensation i.e., any amount paid by Poland in one arbitration (i.e., ECT) is set off against Poland’s liability in the other arbitration (i.e., BIT).
The compensation is denominated in British pound sterling. No hedging is in place for the compensation and accordingly is subject to fluctuations in foreign currency.
Each party has been ordered to cover its own legal fees, expenses and arbitration costs in relation to the Claim, which in respect of GreenX are costs that have already been fully paid under the Litigation Funding Agreement (LFA) with specialist arbitration funder LCM Funding UK Limited (a subsidiary of Litigation Capital Management Ltd) (LCM).
The Tribunal has unanimously held that Poland had breached its obligations under the Treaties in relation to the Jan Karski project, entitling GreenX to compensation. In respect of the Dębieńsko project, the Tribunal did not uphold the Claim under the Treaties.
All of GreenX’s costs associated with the arbitration were funded on a limited basis from LCM. To date, GreenX has drawn down US$11.2 million (A$16.2 million at 30 September 2024) (Outstanding Funding) from the LFA. In accordance with the terms of the LFA, once the compensation is received, LCM is entitled to be paid the Outstanding Funding, a multiple of five times the Outstanding Funding (based on the period since entering into the LFA) and from 1 January 2025, interest on the Outstanding Funding at a rate of 30% per annum, compounding monthly.
Net of the payments to LCM, GreenX will pay 6% of the balance to key management directly involved in the case (as previously approved by shareholders on 20 January 2021) and 3% to key legal advisers who assisted with the case on a reduced and fixed fee.
Upon satisfaction of the award, it is GreenX’s intention to return the majority of the available cash to shareholders in a timely fashion, after payment of the above costs of the arbitration and applicable taxes (if any).
The Claim was brought under the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Rules (UNCITRAL) and the Awards are final and binding on the parties. The UNCITRAL Rules do not provide for an appeal procedure i.e., grant no explicit authority to a panel to reconsider its award. Under the UNCITRAL Rules, either party may, within 30 days of receiving an award, ask the Tribunal to correct any computational, clerical or typographical errors in the award, issue an interpretation of the award or render an additional award on any claims omitted from the final award. These procedures do not allow either party to request that the Tribunal reconsider the merits of its decision.
If a party believes that an award ought to be “set-aside” or “annulled”, then that party must apply for relief from a court where the arbitration was seated, which would be the national courts of England and Wales for the BIT claim and Singapore for the ECT claim. Poland has 28 days from the date of the BIT Award and three months from receiving the ECT Award to apply for set aside of the respective Awards, which can only be set aside under limited circumstances. These time limits may be extended if there is an application for correction or, in the case of the BIT claim, with the permission of the English courts. It is important to note that a “set-aside” motion is different from a general “appeal” since a set-aside motion can in general only relate to a lack of jurisdiction on the part of the Tribunal or procedural unfairness, unlike an appeal, where the actual merits of a case might be revisited by a court. In summary, Poland cannot initiate any post award proceedings to re-examine the Tribunal’s decision on the merits of the case. The threshold to succeed on a “set-aside” motion in either the Singapore or English domestic courts is high, with courts in both jurisdictions rejecting set-aside applications in the vast majority of cases.
TANNENBERG COPPER PROJECT
During the quarter, the Company announced that it has entered into an earn-in agreement (Tannenberg Agreement) through which GreenX can earn a 90% interest in Group 11 Exploration GmbH, a private German company which holds the Tannenberg project.
· Tannenberg is a highly prospective sediment-hosted (Kupferschiefer type) copper deposit.
· Kupferschiefer style deposits are a well-known and prolific subtype of sediment-hosted copper deposit that:
o are the second most prevalent source of copper production and reserves in the world; and
o have been historically mined in Germany and are still mined in Poland where KGHM produced 592 kt of electrolytic copper in 2023
· The Tannenberg exploration licence covers 272 km2 in the State of Hesse in central Germany, encompassing the historical “Richelsdorf” copper – silver mines.
· Prior to closure in the 1950’s, the Richelsdorf mines produced 416,500 t of copper and 33.7 Moz of silver from Kupferschiefer type deposits. These historic mines consisted of shallow underground workings originally accessed from surface outcrops.
· Tannenberg also contains multiple drill intercepts over the high priority 14 km-long Richelsdorf Dome target, including:
o 2.1 m at 2.7% Cu and 48g/t Ag from 365.48 m; 1.5 m at 3.7% Cu and 33 g/t Ag from 209.50 m; 2.5 m at 1.8% Cu and 19 g/t Ag from 339.5 m in the southwest of the license area.
o 2.0 m at 1.6% Cu and 19 g/t Ag from 268 m in the north-east of the license area.
Figure 1: Tannenberg is located in the industrial centre of Europe
· Excellent potential for new discoveries of shallow (50 m to 500 m), large scale and high grade Kupferschiefer style copper and silver mineralisation, with much of licence area remaining untested by modern exploration whereby thicker sections of footwall/ hanging wall mineralisation will be targeted.
· Modern understanding of Kupferschiefer mineralisation from prolific mining in Poland places new emphasis on hanging wall and footwall mineralisation, structural controls and metal zonation.
· In Polish Kupferschiefer mines, mineralisation typically forms within the Kupferschiefer shale and in strata up to 60 m below and 30 m above the shale. E.g., KGHM’s Rudna Mine in Poland, where footwall sandstone hosts 80% of the total copper resource, hanging wall limestone hosts 15%, and Kupferschiefer shale hosts only 5%.
Historical drilling and mine workings confirm the widespread presence of the crucial Kupferschiefer sequence within the Tannenberg project. The sedimentary sequence forms a broad dome that outcrops near the centre of the licence area and extends down to approximately 500 m at the periphery. Regional and small-scale faults cut the licence area with the dominant orientation trending northwest-southeast, perpendicular to the Variscan Orogen. Zones of copper enrichment within the licence area correspond to fault intersections. Structure is a key targeting consideration at Tannenberg.
Figure 2: The Kupferschiefer is gently folded to form the Richelsdorf Dome that extends from surface down to 500 m depth within the licence area. Historical mining around Richelsdorf exploited mineralisation near the surface. Historical drilling intercepted mineralised Kupferschiefer down to 436 m. Much of the Kupferschiefer between 50 to 500 m remains untested
Future work programs at Tannenberg will aid drill targeting. Initially, an in-country search for additional historical drilling and mining records will be undertaken. Geophysical methods such as seismic and magnetic surveys will be evaluated for their effectiveness in delineating subsurface structures at the high-priority Richelsdorf Dome target. Historical drill assays will be used to identify metal zonation patterns useful for exploration targeting.
The area of primary interest covers 14 km-long stretch of the Richelsdorf Dome where Kupferschiefer strata outcrop at surface in the centre and extend down to approximately 500 m at the periphery. GreenX will fund a work program up to €500,000 to satisfy requirements for the grant of an extension of the exploration license at Tannenberg.
eleonore north gold project
In July 2024, following renegotiation with Greenfields Exploration Pty Ltd (Greenfields), GreenX entered into a revised agreement to acquire 100% of Eleonore North project in eastern Greenland.
These revised terms provide GreenX with the opportunity to retain the Eleonore North and to conduct further exploration work before making a decision to continue with the Project by 31 December 2025. Subsequent to the end of the quarter, the exploration licences for Eleonore North were successfully transferred to GreenX.
The Eleonore North gold project comprises of two exploration licences covering an area of 1,221 km2 in an arid part of north-eastern Greenland, approximately 1,000 km south of the Company’s Arctic Rift Copper project (ARC)(Figure 3).
The two exploration licences are located on Ymer Island in the south and the Strindberg Land peninsula in the north (Figure 4). The 300 m deep fjords in this area are around 6 km wide, sailed annually by large container ships, and aircraft frequent the area. The Company had identified no significant environmental, archaeological, or social challenges in the area.
|
|
Figure 3: Map of Greenland showing GreenX’s ARC and Eleonore North license areas |
Figure 4: Map showing prospects and geological features within the Eleonore North license areas |
During the quarter and following renegotiation with Greenfields, GreenX has acquired a 100% interest in Eleonore North through a revised option agreement. Having spent the required amount on an agreed work exploration program for the project, GreenX will now conduct further exploration work on Eleonore North before making a decision to continue with the project by 31 December 2025.
GreenX is again collaborating with the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS). For the last two years, GEUS has conducted fieldwork in the region surrounding and within the Eleonore North licence. GEUS has a multi-year project working to update the geological maps to a higher level of detail. This work is primarily being done with traditional field mapping, sample collection, and helicopter-based photography.
Based on previous discussions with GEUS, there is the possibility to commission GEUS to fast-track production of an updated geological map at Eleonore North based on helicopter photography collected in 2023. Samples collected by GEUS are also available in Copenhagen for inspection and analysis. These samples may provide a new regional perspective on the gold systems present in northeastern Greenland.
Figure 5: Map showing regional historical samples collected by GUES as publicly available from GUES, a subset of which are available for inspection.
ARCTIC RIFT COPPER PROJECT
The ARC project is an exploration joint venture between GreenX and Greenfields. GreenX can earn-in up to 80% in ARC with the Company owning a 51% interest in the project. The project is targeting large scale copper in multiple settings across a 5,774 km2 Special Exploration Licence in eastern North Greenland. The area has been historically underexplored yet is prospective for copper, forming part of the newly identified Kiffaanngissuseq metallogenic province.
The results of work program announced last year have demonstrated the high-grade nature of the known copper sulphide mineralisation and wider copper mineralization in fault hosted Black Earth zones and adjacent sandstone units. The exact position of a native copper fissure at the Neergaard Dal prospect was also identified.
The Company is in the process of analysing further remote-sensing options for ARC, which would be used to supplement current understanding of the known copper sulphide mineralisation and refine plans for the next exploration program.
CORPORATE
At 30 September 2024, GreenX had a cash balance of A$6 million allowing further exploration to be conducted at the Company’s projects and to prepare for enforcement activities in relation to the Claim award.
ENQUIRIES
Ben Stoikovich +44 207 478 3900
|
Sapan Ghai +44 207 478 3900
|
-ENDS-
Forward Looking Statements
This release may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on GreenX’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of GreenX, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. GreenX makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.
Competent Persons Statement
The information in this report that relates to exploration results were extracted from the ASX announcements dated 15 July 2024 and 2 August 2024 which are available to view at www.greenxmetals.com.
GreenX confirms that (a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; (b) all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the content in the relevant announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and (c) the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original announcement
The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (‘MAR’). Upon the publication of this announcement via Regulatory Information Service (‘RIS’), this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain..
APPENDIX 1: TENEMENT INFORMATION
As at 30 September 2024, the Company has an interest in the following tenements:
Location |
Tenement |
Percentage |
Status |
Tenement Type |
Germany |
Tannenberg |
-1 |
Granted |
Exploration Licence |
Greenland |
Arctic Rift Copper project (Licence No. 2021-07 MEL-S) |
512 |
Granted |
Exploration Licence |
Greenland |
Eleonore North gold project |
1003 |
Granted |
Exploration Licence |
Jan Karski, Poland |
Jan Karski Mine Plan Area (K-4-5, K6-7, K-8 and K-9)4 |
–4 |
In dispute – award made in favour of GreenX4 |
Exclusive Right to apply for a mining concession4 |
Debiensko, Poland |
Debiensko 1 |
–4 |
In dispute – award made in favour of GreenX4 |
Mining4 |
Notes:
1 In August 2024, the Company announced that it had entered into the Tanneberg Agreement through which GreenX can earn a 90% interest in the project. As at the date of this report, the Company held no beneficial interest in Tannenberg, other than through the Tannenberg Agreement.
2 In October 2021, the Company announced that it had entered into an earn-in agreement with Greenfields to acquire an interest of up to 80% in ARC. Having met the spend requirement, the Company has been issued with its initial 51% interest in ARC.
3 In July 2024, the Company announced that it had entered into a revised option agreement with Greenfields to acquire 100% of the Eleonore North project. Subsequent to the end of the quarter the transfer of the exploration licences for Eleonore North was completed.
4 GreenX formally commenced international arbitration Claim against the Republic of Poland under both the ECT and the BIT in 2021. Subsequent to the end of the quarter, GreenX reported a successful outcome of the Claim against Poland under both the BIT and the ECT. Refer to further discussion of the Claim above.
Appendix 2: Related Party Payments
During the quarter ended 30 September 2024, the Company made payments of A$220,000 to related parties and their associates. These payments relate to existing remuneration arrangements (director fees, consulting fees and superannuation of A$142,000 and the provision of a serviced office and company secretarial and administration services of A$78,000).
Appendix 3: Exploration and Mining Expenditure
During the quarter ended 30 September 2024, the Company made the following payments in relation to exploration activities:
Activity |
A$000 |
Germany (Tannenberg) |
|
Permitting related costs |
7 |
Monitoring and assays |
2 |
Personnel costs |
3 |
Sub-total |
12 |
|
|
Greenland (Eleonore North and ARC) |
|
Project Management |
65 |
Personnel costs |
28 |
Other (field supplies, satellite imagery, etc) |
12 |
Sub-total |
106 |
Total as reported in the Appendix 5B (item 1.2(a) and 2.1(d)) |
118 |
There were no mining or production activities and expenses incurred during the quarter ended 30 September 2024.
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity or oil and gas exploration entity
quarterly cash flow report
Name of entity |
||
GreenX Metals Limited |
||
ABN |
Quarter ended (“current quarter”) |
|
23 008 677 852 |
30 September 2024 |
Consolidated statement of cash flows |
Current quarter |
Year to date |
|
1. |
Cash flows from operating activities |
– |
– |
1.1 |
Receipts from customers |
||
1.2 |
Payments for |
(106) |
(106) |
(a) exploration & evaluation |
|||
(b) development |
– |
– |
|
(c) production |
– |
– |
|
(d) staff costs |
(364) |
(364) |
|
(e) administration and corporate costs |
(327) |
(327) |
|
1.3 |
Dividends received (see note 3) |
– |
– |
1.4 |
Interest received |
76 |
76 |
1.5 |
Interest and other costs of finance paid |
– |
– |
1.6 |
Income taxes paid |
– |
– |
1.7 |
Government grants and tax incentives |
– |
– |
1.8 |
Other (provide details if material) (a) Business Development (b) Arbitration related expenses (c) Occupancy |
(190) (1) (227) |
(190) (1) (227) |
1.9 |
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities |
(1,139) |
(1,139) |
2. |
Cash flows from investing activities |
– |
– |
2.1 |
Payments to acquire or for: |
||
(a) Entities |
|||
(b) Tenements |
– |
– |
|
(c) property, plant and equipment |
– |
– |
|
(d) exploration & evaluation |
(12) |
(12) |
|
(e) investments |
– |
– |
|
(f) other non-current assets |
– |
– |
|
2.2 |
Proceeds from the disposal of: |
– |
– |
(a) entities |
|||
(b) tenements |
– |
– |
|
(c) property, plant and equipment |
– |
– |
|
(d) investments |
– |
– |
|
(e) other non-current assets |
– |
– |
|
2.3 |
Cash flows from loans to other entities |
– |
– |
2.4 |
Dividends received (see note 3) |
– |
– |
2.5 |
Other (provide details if material) |
– |
– |
2.6 |
Net cash from / (used in) investing activities |
(12) |
(12) |
3. |
Cash flows from financing activities |
– |
– |
3.1 |
Proceeds from issues of equity securities (excluding convertible debt securities) |
||
3.2 |
Proceeds from issue of convertible debt securities |
– |
– |
3.3 |
Proceeds from exercise of options |
– |
– |
3.4 |
Transaction costs related to issues of equity securities or convertible debt securities |
(77) |
(77) |
3.5 |
Proceeds from borrowings |
– |
– |
3.6 |
Repayment of borrowings |
– |
– |
3.7 |
Transaction costs related to loans and borrowings |
– |
– |
3.8 |
Dividends paid |
– |
– |
3.9 |
Other (provide details if material) |
– |
– |
3.10 |
Net cash from / (used in) financing activities |
(77) |
(77) |
4. |
Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the period |
||
4.1 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
7,163 |
7,163 |
4.2 |
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities (item 1.9 above) |
(1,139) |
(1,139) |
4.3 |
Net cash from / (used in) investing activities (item 2.6 above) |
(12) |
(12) |
4.4 |
Net cash from / (used in) financing activities (item 3.10 above) |
(77) |
(77) |
4.5 |
Effect of movement in exchange rates on cash held |
(2) |
(2) |
4.6 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
5,933 |
5,933 |
5. |
Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents |
Current quarter |
Previous quarter |
5.1 |
Bank balances |
2,433 |
3,163 |
5.2 |
Call deposits |
3,500 |
4,000 |
5.3 |
Bank overdrafts |
– |
– |
5.4 |
Other (provide details) |
– |
– |
5.5 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of quarter (should equal item 4.6 above) |
5,933 |
7,163 |
6. |
Payments to related parties of the entity and their associates |
Current quarter |
6.1 |
Aggregate amount of payments to related parties and their associates included in item 1 |
(220) |
6.2 |
Aggregate amount of payments to related parties and their associates included in item 2 |
– |
Note: if any amounts are shown in items 6.1 or 6.2, your quarterly activity report must include a description of, and an explanation for, such payments. |
7. |
Financing facilities Add notes as necessary for an understanding of the sources of finance available to the entity. |
Total facility amount at quarter end |
|
7.1 |
Loan facilities |
17,793* |
16,253 |
7.2 |
Credit standby arrangements |
– |
– |
7.3 |
Other (please specify) |
– |
– |
7.4 |
Total financing facilities |
17,793* |
16,253 |
|
|||
7.5 |
Unused financing facilities available at quarter end |
1,540 |
|
7.6 |
Include in the box below a description of each facility above, including the lender, interest rate, maturity date and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any additional financing facilities have been entered into or are proposed to be entered into after quarter end, include a note providing details of those facilities as well. |
||
On 30 June 2020, the Company executed a Litigation Funding Agreement (LFA) for US$12.3 million (*now worth A$17.8 million with the movement of the A$ compared to the $US) with LCM Funding UK Limited a subsidiary of Litigation Capital Management Limited (LCM), to pursue the damages Claim in relation to the investment dispute between GreenX and Poland). To date, GreenX has drawn down US$11.2 million (A$16.2 million) (Outstanding Funding). In accordance with the terms of the LFA, once the compensation is received, LCM is entitled to be paid the Outstanding Funding, a multiple of five times the Outstanding Funding (based on the period since entering into the LFA) and from 1 January 2025, interest on the Outstanding Funding at a rate of 30% per annum, compounding monthly. |
8. |
Estimated cash available for future operating activities |
$A’000 |
8.1 |
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities (item 1.9) |
(1,139) |
8.2 |
(Payments for exploration & evaluation classified as investing activities) (item 2.1(d)) |
(12) |
8.3 |
Total relevant outgoings (item 8.1 + item 8.2) |
(1,151) |
8.4 |
Cash and cash equivalents at quarter end (item 4.6) |
5,933 |
8.5 |
Unused finance facilities available at quarter end (item 7.5) |
1,540 |
8.6 |
Total available funding (item 8.4 + item 8.5) |
7,473 |
8.7 |
Estimated quarters of funding available (item 8.6 divided by item 8.3) |
>6 |
Note: if the entity has reported positive relevant outgoings (ie a net cash inflow) in item 8.3, answer item 8.7 as “N/A”. Otherwise, a figure for the estimated quarters of funding available must be included in item 8.7. |
||
8.8 |
If item 8.7 is less than 2 quarters, please provide answers to the following questions: |
|
8.8.1 Does the entity expect that it will continue to have the current level of net operating cash flows for the time being and, if not, why not? |
||
Answer: Not applicable |
||
8.8.2 Has the entity taken any steps, or does it propose to take any steps, to raise further cash to fund its operations and, if so, what are those steps and how likely does it believe that they will be successful? |
||
Answer: Not applicable |
||
8.8.3 Does the entity expect to be able to continue its operations and to meet its business objectives and, if so, on what basis? |
||
Answer: Not applicable |
||
Note: where item 8.7 is less than 2 quarters, all of questions 8.8.1, 8.8.2 and 8.8.3 above must be answered. |
Compliance statement
1 This statement has been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.
2 This statement gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
Date: 17 October 2024
Authorised by: Company Secretary
(Name of body or officer authorising release – see note 4)
Notes
1. This quarterly cash flow report and the accompanying activity report provide a basis for informing the market about the entity’s activities for the past quarter, how they have been financed and the effect this has had on its cash position. An entity that wishes to disclose additional information over and above the minimum required under the Listing Rules is encouraged to do so.
2. If this quarterly cash flow report has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, the definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly cash flow report has been prepared in accordance with other accounting standards agreed by ASX pursuant to Listing Rule 19.11A, the corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.
3. Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from operating activities or cash flows from investing activities, depending on the accounting policy of the entity.
4. If this report has been authorised for release to the market by your board of directors, you can insert here: “By the board”. If it has been authorised for release to the market by a committee of your board of directors, you can insert here: “By the [name of board committee – eg Audit and Risk Committee]”. If it has been authorised for release to the market by a disclosure committee, you can insert here: “By the Disclosure Committee”.
5. If this report has been authorised for release to the market by your board of directors and you wish to hold yourself out as complying with recommendation 4.2 of the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations, the board should have received a declaration from its CEO and CFO that, in their opinion, the financial records of the entity have been properly maintained, that this report complies with the appropriate accounting standards and gives a true and fair view of the cash flows of the entity, and that their opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system of risk management and internal control which is operating effectively.
#GRX GreenX Limited – COMPENSATION OF £252M IN SUCCESSFUL ARBITRATION
8th October 2024 / Leave a comment
GREENX WINS COMPENSATION AND INTEREST TOTALLING £252M MILLION IN SUCCESSFUL ARBITRATION OUTCOME
GreenX Metals Limited (GreenX, Claimant or Company) is pleased to report a successful outcome of the international arbitration claims (Claim) against the Republic of Poland (Poland or Respondent) under both the Australia-Poland Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) and the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) (together the Treaties).
· The Company has been awarded approximately £252m (A$490m / PLN1.3bn) in compensation by the Tribunal under the BIT (BIT Award), which includes interest compounded at the Sterling Over-Night Interbank Average (SONIA) plus one percentage point (+1%) compounded annually from 31 December 2019 to the date of the award (7 October 2024). Interest will continue to accrue at SONIA +1% compounded annually until full and final payment by the Respondent.
· The Company has been awarded approximately £183m (A$355m / PLN 941m) in compensation by the Tribunal under the ECT (ECT Award), which includes interest compounded at the SONIA overnight rate +1% compounded annually from 31 December 2019. Interest will continue to accrue at SONIA +1% compounded annually until full and final payment by the Respondent.
· Both Awards are subject to any payments made by the Respondent to the Claimant in the other arbitration such that the Claimant is not entitled to double compensation i.e., any amount paid by Poland in one arbitration (i.e., BIT) is set off against Poland’s liability in the other arbitration (i.e., ECT).
· Each party has been ordered to cover its own legal fees, expenses and arbitration costs in relation to the Claim, which in respect of GreenX are costs that have already been fully paid under the Litigation Capital Management (LCM) funding facility.
The Announcement Contains Inside Information
The Tribunal has unanimously held that the Republic of Poland had breached its obligations under the Treaties in relation to the Jan Karski project, entitling GreenX to compensation. In respect of the Dębieńsko project, the Tribunal did not uphold the Claim under the Treaties.
All of GreenX’s costs associated with the arbitration were funded on a non-recourse basis from specialist arbitration funder LCM (please refer to the Company’s announcement dated 1 July 2020 entitled A$18m Litigation Funding to Pursue Damages Claim Against The Polish Government).
The Claim was brought under the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Rules (UNCITRAL) and the Awards are final and binding on the parties. The UNCITRAL Rules do not provide for an appeal procedure i.e., grant no explicit authority to a panel to reconsider its award. Under the UNCITRAL Rules, either party may, within 30 days of receiving an award, ask the Tribunal to correct any computational, clerical or typographical errors in the award, issue an interpretation of the award or render an additional award on any claims omitted from the final award. These procedures do not allow either party to request that the Tribunal reconsider the merits of its decision.
If a party believes that an award ought to be “set-aside” or “annulled”, then that party must apply for relief from a court where the arbitration was seated, which would be the national courts of England and Wales for the BIT claim and Singapore for the ECT claim. Poland has 28 days from the date of the BIT Award and three months from receiving the ECT Award to apply for set aside of the respective Awards, which can only be set aside under limited circumstances. It is important to note that a “set-aside” motion is different from a general “appeal” since a set-aside motion can in general only relate to a lack of jurisdiction on the part of the Tribunal or procedural unfairness, unlike an appeal, where the actual merits of a case might be revisited by a court. In summary, Poland cannot initiate any post award proceedings to re-examine the Tribunal’s decision on the merits of the case. The threshold to succeed on a “set-aside” motion in either the Singapore or English domestic courts is high, with courts in both jurisdictions rejecting set-aside applications in the vast majority of cases.
The Company will provide further details to the market in due course, once the Company and its legal team have completed detailed review of the full text of both Awards.
ENQUIRIES
Ben Stoikovich +44 207 478 3900
|
#GRX GreenX Metals LTD – 2024 Annual Report
27th September 2024 / Leave a comment
GreenX Metals Limited (GreenX or the Company) advises that its 2024 Annual Report, has been published at https://greenxmetals.com/investors/announcements/, will be uploaded to the National Storage Mechanism at https://data.fca.org.uk/#/nsm/nationalstoragemechanism and is attached as a PDF to this news release.
The Company also advises that an Appendix 4G (Key to Disclosures: Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations) and 2024 Corporate Governance Statement have been released today and are also available on the Company’s website at https://greenxmetals.com/about/corporate-governance/ and are attached as a PDF to this news release.
Further, that the Company’s Annual General Meeting (AGM) will be held on Friday, 22 November 2024.
An item of business at the AGM will be the re-election of Directors. In accordance with clause 6.2(f) of the Company’s Constitution, the closing date for receipt of nominations from persons wishing to be considered for election as a Director is Friday, 4 October 2024. Any nominations must be received at the Company’s registered office no later than 5.00 pm (Perth time) on Friday, 4 October 2024.
Further information about the AGM, including the Notice of AGM, will be provided to shareholders in October 2024.
LEI: 213800EHCGNYSCN9T108
Classification: 1.1 Annual financial and audit reports
For further information please contact:
Dylan Browne
Company Secretary
+61 8 9322 6322
Sharepickers – Alan Green discusses Trifast #TRI, Tribe Technology #TRYB & GreenX Metals #GRX with Justin Waite
6th August 2024 / Leave a comment
Sharepickers – Alan Green discusses Trifast #TRI, Tribe Technology #TRYB & GreenX Metals #GRX with Justin Waite
Recent Posts
- Cadence Minerals #KDNC – PFS Level Economic Study for the Amapa Iron Ore Project Increases Net Present Value to US$1.97 Billion
- Quoted Micro 2 December 2024
- Alan Green covers Botswana Diamonds #BOD, Anglesey Mining #AYM & Dan Flynn covers Mila Resources #MILA on this week’s Stockbox Research Talks
- #ECR Minerals – Collaboration Agreement with James Cook University on Rare Earth Elements at the Lolworth Project
- #BRES Blencowe Resources PLC – Blencowe Joins European EV Consortium