Home » Posts tagged 'exploration'
Tag Archives: exploration
#FCM First Class Metals PLC – Half-year Report
30th September 2024 / Leave a comment
First Class Metals PLC (“First Class Metals” “FCM” or the “Company”) the UK listed metals exploration company seeking economic metal discoveries across its extensive Canadian Schreiber-Hemlo, Sunbeam and Zigzag land holdings is pleased to present its interim results for the six months ended 30 June 2024.
Interim Management Report
I. Operational Highlights
In early May FCM announced that field work had been initiated on its projects in Canada, with three exploration teams deployed:
· Review of the historical core from the Sunbeam Property
· Reconnaissance trip to the Quinlan claims for access appraisal
· Preparation for stripping at North Hemlo
Additionally, Prospectair has been retained to undertake a geophysical survey at the newly acquired Kerrs Gold Property.
Marc Sale, CEO commented:
“I am, as ever, enthusiastic with the speed at which FCM has started the field season, all thanks to EGS’ (Emerald Geological Services) support. The review of the Sunbeam Property core, the geophysics survey over Kerrs and the preparation for work at Dead Otter herald an exciting field season for First Class”
II. Corporate and Financial Highlights
Since the beginning of 2024, the Company has undertaken several corporate actions aimed at leveraging its exceptional team and extensive network. FCM is now entering a phase of development that is expected to result in a significant increase in activity across its portfolio of assets.
· On 22 February the Company successfully completed a private placement through a subscription with an existing high-net-worth shareholder, issuing 3,700,000 ordinary shares at a price of 4.5 pence per share, thereby raising £166,500. This placement was facilitated by an additional share loan from the Company’s Executive Chairman, James Knowles, consisting of 3,700,000 shares.
· On 20 March 2024, the Company received approval for a maximum CAD$200,000 OJEP Grant for work completed on the Zigzag lithium and critical metals property, covering up to 50% of exploration expenditures from 1 April 2023, to 15 February 2024. This grant, which First Class has successfully secured in consecutive years, reflects the Ontario Government’s commitment to supporting early exploration for junior companies, and FCM is proud to be the only UK company to receive this non-dilutive funding for the second year running.
· On 3 April 2024, the Company received a Goods and Services Tax (GST)/Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) credit amounting to CAD$212,780.03 for the year ending 2023. This credit reflects the Company’s eligible expenditures and represents an important financial benefit, enhancing cash flow and supporting ongoing operations.
· On 9 April 2024, discussions commenced with Seventy Ninth Resources Limited (“SNR”), a division of the Seventy Ninth Group Limited (“SNG”), regarding several of FCM’s core and non-core assets. This negotiation underscored FCM’s business model of acquiring, enhancing, and monetizing its assets. The Company continues to explore potential synergies with SNR to expand their portfolio of natural resources assets.
· On 13 June 2024, the McKellar and Enable properties were sold to SNG for a combined cash payment of £270,000. Additionally, the Company entered into a £230,000 drawdown facility with SNG over a 12-month period, which will be utilised for general working capital and to advance exploration activities on remaining FCM properties. The loan, drawn in a single tranche, is secured by a debenture over the assets of First Class Metals PLC, carries a 15% coupon, and is structured on an interest-only basis with repayment due on 25 May 2025. Seventy Ninth Resources continues to conduct further due diligence on additional FCM assets, as previously announced on 9 April 2024.
James Knowles, Chairman commented:
“In the first half of the year, First Class Metals achieved a significant milestone with the successful asset sale to 79th Group, enhancing our financial position and providing resources for future growth. Our recent capital raises through share placements reflect our commitment to advancing our core portfolio and maximising shareholder value. We appreciate shareholders’ support as we continue to strengthen our position in the Canadian precious & critical metals exploration sector and work towards achieving our strategic goals. Thank you for being a part of our journey.”
III. Post period highlights
In the last three months comprising July to September 2024, FCM has been active both operationally with its exploration projects in Canada as well as on its corporate side. The highlights for this period are:
· On 8 July 2024, the Company completed the repayment of a share loan from director James Knowles, issuing 9,695,332 new ordinary shares to settle the outstanding position related to two tranches previously loaned to the Company.
· On 17 July 2024, the Company completed a private placing of 3,035,714 ordinary shares at a price of 2.8 pence per share, raising gross proceeds of £85,000, which represented a 5.6% premium to the mid-market closing price on July 16, 2024. To facilitate this placing, Executive Chairman James Knowles entered into a share lending agreement to loan the required shares to the Company, with the allotment of 5,912,059 new shares from him. No fees or security were associated with this share loan.
· On 2 August 2024, the Company completed the repayment of shares loaned by Executive Chairman James Knowles, issuing 5,912,059 new ordinary shares to settle the outstanding position related to two tranches previously announced on 17 July 2024. On the same date the Company also completed a private placing of 9,500,000 shares at a price of 2.7 pence per share, raising gross proceeds of £256,500, with Axis Capital Markets acting as the sole placing agent and subsequently appointed as the Company’s new broker.
IV. Financial Review
Funding
At the period end, the Group was funded through equity raises as well as sale of certain properties as stated above. A sum of £435,000 was raised through private placement and sale of properties.
Current Assets
At 30 June 2024, the Group had trade and other receivables of £75,428 (Dec 2023: £290,012, June 2023: £157,632).
Liquidity, cash and cash equivalents
At 30 June 2024, the Group held £83,006 (Dec 2023: £140,802, 30 June 2023: £844,131) of cash and cash equivalents, all of which are denominated in pound sterling.
Going concern
The financial information has been prepared on the basis that the Group will continue as a going concern.
As a junior exploration company, the Directors are aware that the Company must seek funds from the market to meet its investment and exploration plans and to maintain its listing status.
The Group’s reliance on a successful fund raising presents a material uncertainty that may cast doubt on the Group’s ability to continue to operate as planned and to pay its liabilities as they fall due.
The Company successfully raised £166,500 in the period ended 30 June 2024 through issuing shares loaned by a director. Additionally Canadian Tax Refunds of $212,780, the “OJEP” Grant receipt of $200,000 and property sales of £270,000 have been received during the period.
The Directors are aware of the reliance on fund raising within the next 12 months and the material uncertainty this presents but having reviewed the Group’s working capital forecasts they believe the Group is well placed to manage its business risks successfully providing the fund raising is successful.
|
|
Financial risk review
Group
Principle risks & uncertainties are detailed in the most recent Annual report (page 54) which can be found on the company’s website and remain unchanged. This Annual Report can be found at: https://www.firstclassmetalsplc.com/.
This note presents information about the group’s exposure to financial risks and the group’s management of capital.
Capital risk management
The Group’s objectives when managing capital are: (a) To maintain a flexible capital structure which optimizes the cost of capital at acceptable risk; (b) To meet external capital requirements on debt and credit facilities; (c) To ensure adequate capital to support long-term growth strategy; and (d) To provide an adequate return to shareholders. The Group continuously monitors and reviews the capital structure to ensure the objectives are met. Management defines capital as the combination of its indebtedness and equity balances and manages the capital structure within the context of the business strategy, general economic conditions, market conditions in the power industry and the risk characteristics of assets. The Group’s objectives in managing capital and the definition of capital remain unchanged throughout the period. External factors, such as the economic environment, have not altered the Group’s objectives in managing capital.
Credit risk
The group’s definition of credit risk is Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations. At present the Group does not have any customers and its risk on cash and bank is mitigated by holding of the funds in an “A” rated bank.
Liquidity risk
The group’s definition of liquidity risk is Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they become due. The Group manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate cash balances.
Market risk
The group’s definition of market risk is Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as commodity prices, will affect the Group’s earnings. The objective of market risk management is to identify both the market risk and the Group’s option to mitigate this risk.
A majority of the Group’s operating costs will be incurred in US and Canadian dollars, whilst the Group has raised capital in £ Sterling. The Group will incur exploration costs in US and Canadian Dollars, but it has raised capital in £ Sterling. Fluctuations in exchange rates of the US Dollar and Canadian Dollar against £ Sterling may materially affect the Group’s translated results of operations. In addition, given the relatively small size of the Group, it may not be able to effectively hedge against risks associated with currency exchange rates at commercially realistic rates. Accordingly, any significant adverse fluctuations in currency rates could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition and prospects to a much greater extent than might be expected for a larger enterprise.
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value of the future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market rates of interest. As the Group has no significant interest bearing assets or liabilities, the group’s operating cash flows are substantially independent of changes in market interest rates. Therefore, the Group is not exposed to significant interest rate risk.
UK Listing Rules
On 29 July 2024, the Listing Rules were replaced by the UK Listing Rules (“UKLR”) under which the existing Standard Listing category was replaced by the Equity Shares (transition) category under Chapter 22 of the UKLR. Consequently, with effect from that date the Company is admitted to Equity Shares (transition) category of the Official List under Chapter 22 of the UKLR and to trading on the London Stock Exchange’s Main Market for listed securities.
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities
The Directors are responsible for preparing this report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable United Kingdom law and regulations and UK adopted International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).
Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial period which present fairly the financial position of the Company and the financial performance and cash flows of the Company for that period. In preparing those financial statements, the Directors are required to:
• select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
• make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
• present information, including accounting policies, in a manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable information;
• state whether applicable IFRS standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements;
• prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will continue in business; and
• provide additional disclosures when compliance with the specific requirements in IFRS standards is insufficient to enable users to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the entity’s financial position and financial performance.
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure that the Company financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006 and Article 4 of the IAS Regulation. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
Under applicable law and regulations, the Directors are also responsible for preparing a Strategic Report, Directors’ Report, Directors’ Remuneration Report and Corporate Governance Statement that comply with that law and those regulations, and for ensuring that the Annual report includes information required by the Listing Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority.
The financial statements are published on the Company’s website https://www.firstclassmetalsplc.com/. The work carried out by the Auditor does not involve consideration of the maintenance and integrity of this website and accordingly, the Auditor accepts no responsibility for any changes that have occurred to the financial statements since they were initially presented on the website. Visitors to the website need to be aware that legislation in the United Kingdom covering the preparation and dissemination of the financial statements may differ from legislation in their jurisdiction.
The Directors confirm that to the best of their knowledge the Company financial statements give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position of the Company.
Half yearly accounts
Consolidated Income Statement for the Period from 1 January 2024 to 30 June 2024
6 months to |
6 months to |
12 months to |
|
Revenue |
– |
– |
|
Cost of sales |
– |
– |
|
Gross loss |
– |
– |
|
Administrative expenses |
(573,159) |
(693,460) |
(1,461,347) |
Other gains |
32,503 |
– |
– |
Operating loss |
(540,656) |
(693,460) |
(1,461,347) |
Finance income |
71 |
2,058 |
5,742 |
Finance costs |
(16,100) |
(53,298) |
(123,324) |
Net finance cost |
(16,029) |
(51,240) |
(117,582) |
Loss before tax |
(556,685) |
(744,700) |
(1,578,929) |
Loss for the period |
(556,685) |
(744,700) |
(1,578,929) |
Profit/(loss) attributable to: |
|||
Owners of the company |
(556,685) |
(744,700) |
(1,578,929) |
Loss for the period |
(556,685) |
(744,700) |
(1,578,929) |
|
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss |
||||
Foreign currency translation (losses)/gains |
(9,848) |
(84) |
14 |
|
Total comprehensive (loss)/income for the period |
(566,533) |
(744,784) |
(1,578,915) |
|
Total comprehensive (loss)/income attributable to: |
||||
Owners of the company |
(566,533) |
(744,784) |
(1,578,915) |
|
Loss per share: |
(0.87) |
(1.06)p |
(2.13)p |
|
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June 2024
Note |
30 June |
30 June |
31 December |
|
Assets |
||||
Non-current assets |
||||
Property, plant and equipment |
5 |
636 |
1,169 |
903 |
Mineral property exploration and evaluation |
4 |
3,427,255 |
2,914,105 |
3,351,389 |
3,427,891 |
2,915,274 |
3,352,292 |
||
Current assets |
||||
Trade and other receivables |
7 |
75,427 |
157,632 |
290,012 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
8 |
83,006 |
844,131 |
140,802 |
158,433 |
1,001,763 |
430,814 |
||
Total assets |
3,586,324 |
3,917,037 |
3,783,106 |
|
Equity and liabilities |
||||
Equity |
||||
Share capital |
9 |
(82,046) |
(79,551) |
(82,046) |
Share premium |
(4,719,622) |
(4,470,806) |
(4,719,622) |
|
Equity reserve |
(719,440) |
(22,201) |
(719,440) |
|
Foreign currency translation reserve |
9,736 |
(14) |
(112) |
|
Retained earnings |
2,981,329 |
1,614,079 |
2,424,644 |
|
Equity attributable to owners of the company |
(2,530,043) |
(2,958,493) |
(3,096,576) |
|
Current liabilities |
||||
Trade and other payables |
11 |
(821,596) |
(459,558) |
(526,530) |
Loans and borrowings |
10 |
(234,685) |
(498,986) |
(160,000) |
Total liabilities |
(1,056,281) |
(958,544) |
(686,530) |
|
Total equity and liabilities |
(3,586,324) |
(3,917,037) |
(3,783,106) |
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the Period from 1 January 2024 to 30 June 2024
Unaudited |
Share capital |
Share premium |
Equity reserve |
Foreign currency translation |
Retained earnings |
Total equity |
At 1 January 2024 |
82,046 |
4,719,622 |
719,440 |
112 |
(2,424,644) |
3,096,576 |
Loss for the period |
– |
– |
– |
– |
(556,685) |
(556,685) |
Other comprehensive income |
– |
– |
– |
(9,848) |
– |
(9,848) |
Total comprehensive income |
– |
– |
– |
(9,848) |
(556,685) |
(566,533) |
At 30 June 2024 |
82,046 |
4,719,622 |
719,440 |
(9,736) |
(2,981,329) |
2,530,043 |
Unaudited |
Share capital |
Share premium |
Equity reserve |
Foreign currency translation |
Retained earnings |
Total equity |
At 1 January 2023 |
69,049 |
3,395,168 |
10,258 |
98 |
(869,379) |
2,605,194 |
Loss for the period |
– |
– |
– |
– |
(744,700) |
(744,700) |
Other comprehensive income |
– |
– |
– |
(84) |
– |
(84) |
Total comprehensive income |
– |
– |
– |
(84) |
(744,700) |
(744,784) |
New share capital subscribed |
10,502 |
1,075,638 |
– |
– |
– |
1,086,140 |
Other equity reserve movements |
– |
– |
11,943 |
– |
– |
11,943 |
At 30 June 2023 |
79,551 |
4,470,806 |
22,201 |
14 |
(1,614,079) |
2,958,493 |
Audited |
Share capital |
Share premium |
Equity reserve |
Foreign currency translation |
Retained earnings |
Total equity |
At 1 January 2023 |
69,049 |
3,395,168 |
10,258 |
98 |
(869,379) |
2,605,194 |
Loss for the period |
– |
– |
– |
– |
(1,578,929) |
(1,578,929) |
Other comprehensive income |
– |
– |
– |
14 |
– |
14 |
Total comprehensive income |
– |
– |
– |
14 |
(1,578,929) |
(1,578,915) |
New share capital subscribed |
12,997 |
1,324,454 |
– |
– |
– |
1,337,451 |
Shares to be issued |
– |
– |
719,440 |
– |
– |
719,440 |
Other equity reserve movements |
– |
– |
13,406 |
– |
– |
13,406 |
Transfer |
– |
– |
(23,664) |
– |
23,664 |
– |
At 31 December 2023 |
82,046 |
4,719,622 |
719,440 |
112 |
(2,424,644) |
3,096,576 |
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Period from 1 January 2024 to 30 June 2024
Note |
6 months to |
6 months to |
12 months to |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||
Loss for the period |
(576,268) |
(744,700) |
(1,578,929) |
|
Adjustments to cash flows from non-cash items |
||||
Depreciation and amortisation |
266 |
266 |
532 |
|
Profit on disposal of intangible assets |
(32,503) |
– |
– |
|
Impairment losses |
3,306 |
– |
88,568 |
|
Foreign exchange loss/(gain) |
104,910 |
80,474 |
77,447 |
|
Finance income |
(71) |
(2,058) |
(5,742) |
|
Finance costs |
16,099 |
53,298 |
123,324 |
|
(484,261) |
(612,720) |
(1,294,800) |
||
Working capital adjustments |
||||
Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables |
7 |
99,208 |
68,585 |
(107,521) |
Increase in trade and other payables |
11 |
54,221 |
102,233 |
283,876 |
Increase in deferred consideration |
(54,609) |
– |
– |
|
Net cash flow from operating activities |
(385,441) |
(441,902) |
(1,118,445) |
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||
Interest received |
71 |
2,058 |
5,742 |
|
Acquisitions of property plant and equipment |
– |
(624) |
(624) |
|
Proceeds from sale on intangible assets |
274,291 |
– |
– |
|
Acquisition of mineral property exploration and revaluation |
4 |
(287,210) |
(729,823) |
(1,253,726) |
Net cash flows from investing activities |
(12,848) |
(728,389) |
(1,248,608) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||
Interest paid |
– |
– |
(18) |
|
Proceeds from issue of ordinary shares, net of issue costs |
– |
1,098,083 |
1,337,451 |
|
Proceeds from other borrowing draw downs |
230,000 |
280,394 |
450,000 |
|
Repayment of other borrowing |
(160,000) |
(15,353) |
(517,143) |
|
Financing of shares loaned by directors |
166,500 |
– |
725,602 |
|
Finance cost of financial instruments |
– |
– |
(123,305) |
|
Foreign exchange loss/(gain) |
– |
– |
(77,447) |
|
Net cash flows from financing activities |
236,500 |
1,363,124 |
1,795,140 |
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(161,789) |
192,833 |
(571,913) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January |
140,802 |
712,715 |
712,715 |
|
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash held |
99,308 |
(61,417) |
– |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at 30 June |
78,321 |
844,131 |
140,802 |
Notes to the Financial Statements for the Period from 1 January 2024 to 30 June 2024
1 |
General information |
The Company is a public company limited by share capital, incorporated and domiciled in England and Wales.
The principal activity of the Company was that of a holding company.
The principal activity of the Group was that of the exploration of gold and other semi-precious metals as well as battery metals critical to energy storage and power generation solutions.
The Company’s ordinary shares are traded on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) under the ticker symbol FCM.
The address of its registered office is:
Suite 16 Freckleton Business Centre
Freckleton Street
Blackburn
Lancashire BB2 2AL
United Kingdom
These unaudited interim results comprise the Company and its subsidiary, First Class Metals Canada Inc. .
The Company’s interim report and accounts for the six months ended 30 June 2024 have been prepared using the recognition and measurement principles of International Accounting Standards in conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
These interim financial statements for the six months ended 30 June 2024 should be read in conjunction with the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023, which have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRSs”) as applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006. The interim report and accounts do not include all the information and disclosures required in the annual financial statements.
The interim report and accounts have been prepared in accordance with IAS34 (interim financial statements) and on the basis of the accounting policies, presentation and methods of computation as set out in the Company’s December 2023 Annual Report and Accounts, except for those that relate to new standards and interpretations effective for the first time for periods beginning on (or after) 1 January 2024 and will be adopted in the 2024 annual financial statements.
The financial information is presented in Pounds Sterling, rounded to the nearest pound and has been prepared under the historical cost convention.
The interim report and accounts do not comprise statutory accounts within the meaning of section 434 of the Companies Act 2006. These interim financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 28 September 2024. The results for the six months to 30 June 2024 and the comparative results for the six months to 30 June 2023 are unaudited. The figures for the year ended 31 December 2023 are extracted from the audited statutory accounts of the Company for that period.
Going Concern
The Directors have confirmed their intention to support the Company whilst it is in the process of raising funds to achieve its business plans. The Directors consider that sufficient resources are available to support the Company’s operations for the foreseeable future and therefore believe that the going concern basis of preparation is appropriate.
2 Loss per share
6 months ended 30 June 2024 |
6 months ended 30 June 2023 |
12 months ended 31 December 2023 |
||
(unaudited) |
(unaudited) |
(audited) |
||
Loss from operations |
£ |
(556,685) |
(744,700) |
(1,578,915) |
Weighted average number of shares |
63,838,554 |
70,410,322 |
74,217,536 |
|
Basic and fully diluted loss per share |
Pence |
(0.87) |
(1.06) |
(2.13) |
Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the loss attributable to equity holders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the period.
There are potentially issuable shares all of which relate to share warrants issued as part of placings in 2022. However, due to the losses for the year the impact of the potential additional shares is anti-dilutive and has therefore not been recognised in the calculation of the fully diluted loss per share.
3 |
Earnings per share |
The calculation of the basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) has been based on the loss attributable to ordinary shareholders and weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding.
4 |
Mineral property exploration and evaluation |
||
Mineral property exploration and evaluation |
|
||
Cost or valuation |
|||
At 1 January 2023 |
2,256,720 |
||
Additions |
1,253,726 |
||
Foreign exchange movements |
(70,489) |
||
At 31 December 2023 |
3,439,957 |
||
At 1 January 2024 |
3,439,957 |
||
Additions |
414,476 |
||
Disposals |
(240,204) |
||
Foreign exchange movements |
(183,691) |
||
At 30 June 2024 |
3,430,538 |
||
Amortisation |
|||
Impairment |
(3,283) |
||
Carrying amount |
|||
At 30 June 2024 |
3,427,255 |
||
At 30 June 2023 |
2,914,105 |
||
At 31 December 2023 |
3,351,389 |
||
5 |
Property, plant and equipment |
||
Group
Furniture, fittings and equipment |
|||||
|
|||||
At 1 January 2023 |
974 |
|
|||
Additions |
624 |
|
|||
At 30 June 2023 |
1,598 |
|
|||
Depreciation |
|
||||
At 1 January 2023 |
162 |
|
|||
Charge for the period |
533 |
|
|||
At 31 December 2023 |
695 |
|
|||
At 1 January 2024 |
695 |
|
|||
Charge for the period |
267 |
|
|||
At 30 June 2024 |
962 |
|
|||
Carrying amount |
|
||||
At 30 June 2024 |
636 |
|
|||
At 31 December 2023 |
903 |
|
|||
6 |
Investments |
|
|||
Group subsidiaries
Details of the group subsidiaries as at 30 June 2024 are as follows:
Name of subsidiary
|
Principal activity
|
Registered office
|
Proportion of ownership interest and voting rights held |
2023 |
First Class Metals Canada Inc.* |
Mining of other non-ferrous metal ores |
55 York Street Canada |
100% |
100% |
* indicates direct investment of the company.
7 |
Trade and other receivables |
|||
30 June |
30 June |
31 December |
||
Accrued income |
34,684 |
– |
118,991 |
|
Prepayments |
2,292 |
60,479 |
32,452 |
|
Other receivables |
38,451 |
97,153 |
138,569 |
|
75,427 |
157,632 |
290,012 |
||
8 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|||||
30 June |
30 June |
31 December |
|
|||
Cash at bank |
83,006 |
844,131 |
140,802 |
|
||
Bank overdrafts |
(4,685) |
– |
– |
|
||
78,321 |
844,131 |
140,802 |
|
|||
9 |
Share capital |
|||||
|
||||||
Allotted, called up and fully paid shares
30 June |
31 December |
|||
No. |
£ |
No. |
£ |
|
Ordinary shares of £0.001 each |
82,046,029 |
82,046 |
82,046,029 |
82,046.03 |
Zigzag Option Agreement In accordance with the Zigzag Option Agreement, payments and issuances of FCM ordinary shares are scheduled over a four-year period. The following table provides a detailed summary of the contractual obligations for cash payments, the issuance of ordinary shares, and the annual work commitments as per the agreement:
Issuance of FCM Ordinary Shares The financial position as of 30 June 2024 reflects this as a share issuance obligation. Since the shares have now been issued, no further liability for these shares remains outstanding as of the date of this report. The schedule above continues to outline the future obligations under the option scheme for the subsequent periods. Kerrs Gold Property – IFRS Disclosure In accordance with the Kerrs Gold Property Agreement, the following is a summary of the contractual obligations:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Shares Quinlan Property – IFRS Disclosure In accordance with the Quinlan Property Agreement, the following is a summary of the contractual obligations:
*The issuance of CAD $15,000 in ordinary FCM shares, originally due on signing, is still pending as of 30 June 2024 and will be completed upon the next prospectus publication. Issuance of Shares Ongold Property – IFRS Disclosure In accordance with the Ongold Property Agreement, the following is a summary of the share issuance obligation:
Issuance of Shares Future updates will reflect the status of this issuance in accordance with the terms of the agreement.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 |
Loans and borrowings |
30 June |
30 June |
31 December |
|
Current loans and borrowings |
|||
Bank overdraft |
4,685 |
– |
– |
Other borrowings |
230,000 |
– |
– |
Convertible debt |
– |
498,986 |
160,000 |
234,685 |
498,986 |
160,000 |
The group’s exposure to market and liquidity risks, including maturity analysis, relating to loans and borrowings is disclosed in note 15 “Financial risk review”.
In June 2024, the company completed the drawdown facility of £230,000 from the 79th Grp Limited and this is secured by way of debenture.
11 |
Trade and other payables |
||||
30 June |
30 June |
31 December |
|
||
Trade payables |
128,613 |
183,257 |
114,959 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
483,170 |
269,562 |
385,277 |
|
|
Social security and other taxes |
23,796 |
4,875 |
15,735 |
|
|
Outstanding defined contribution pension costs |
– |
1,864 |
– |
|
|
Other payables |
186,017 |
– |
10,559 |
|
|
821,596 |
459,558 |
526,530 |
|
||
12 |
Post balance sheet events As of July 8, 2024, the Company completed the repayment of a share loan from director James Knowles, issuing 9,695,332 new ordinary shares to settle the outstanding position related to two tranches previously loaned to the Company.
As of July 17, 2024, the Company completed a private placing of 3,035,714 ordinary shares at a price of 2.8 pence per share, raising gross proceeds of £85,000, which represented a 5.6% premium to the mid-market closing price on July 16, 2024. To facilitate this placing, Executive Chairman James Knowles entered into a share lending agreement to loan the required shares to the Company, with the allotment of 5,912,059 new shares from him. No fees or security were associated with this share loan.
On August 2, 2024, the Company completed the repayment of shares loaned by Executive Chairman James Knowles, issuing 5,912,059 new ordinary shares to settle the outstanding position related to two tranches previously announced on July 17, 2024.
The Company also completed a private placing of 9,500,000 shares at a price of 2.7 pence per share, raising gross proceeds of £256,500, with Axis Capital Markets acting as the sole placing agent and subsequently appointed as the Company’s new broker.
|
|
13 |
Related party transactions |
|
Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability (directly or indirectly) to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial and operating decisions. Parties are also considered related if they are subject to common control or common significant influence. Related parties may be individuals or corporate entities.
During the period, the Group incurred consultancy and travel expenses in relation to the intangible assets from Specialist Exploration Services (Scotland) Limited, a company controlled by a common director. The services were for £83,234 (Dec 2023: £181,814) of which £Nil (Dec 2023: £7,000) was outstanding at 30 June 2024.
During the year, the Group incurred director’s fees for A Williamson through Vrynwy Limited, a company controlled by a common director. The services were for £17,188 (2023: £4,170) of which £2,750 (2023: £Nil) was outstanding at 30 June 2024.
During the year, the director, James Knowles loaned additional 3,700,000 shares with total loaned being 9,695,332 and Ayub Bodi loaned 5,995,331 in the previous year, to be returned on the publication of prospectus or when headroom allows. This has been reflected in the equity reserve. The directors received an 8.25% facility fee on the shares loaned. Ayub Bodi was resigned as director on 2 February 2024.
#SVML Sovereign Metals LTD – Rio Tinto Shareholding and Issue of Shares
13th September 2024 / Leave a comment
Sovereign Metals Limited (ASX: SVM, AIM: SVML, OTCQX: SVMLF) (Sovereign or the Company) advises that it has issued 2,326,880 fully paid ordinary shares (Shares) in the capital of the Company, comprising of 1,290,392 Shares issued to Rio Tinto Mining and Exploration Limited (Rio Tinto) and 1,036,488 Shares issued to SCP Resource Finance, as an advisory fee of 3% on the amount of Rio Tinto’s option investment in July 2024 (refer to Company announcement on 3 July 2024).
An application will be made for the Shares to be admitted to trading on AIM (Admission) and it is expected that Admission will become effective on or around 19 September 2024.
RIO TINTO INCREASES ITS SHAREHOLDING TO 19.9%
Following the exercise of its unlisted options on 3 July 2024, Rio Tinto has made an additional investment of A$690,360 in Sovereign through the issue of 1,290,392 Shares (Additional Shares) pursuant to Rio Tinto’s first right of refusal on equity issues. This is in accordance with the Investment Agreement between Rio Tinto and the Company dated 16 July 2023. Following the issue of Additional Shares today, Rio Tinto has increased its shareholding in Sovereign to 19.9%.
Total Voting Rights
For the purposes of the Financial Conduct Authority’s Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTRs), following Admission of the Shares, Sovereign will have 599,879,879 Ordinary Shares in issue with voting rights attached. The figure of 599,879,879 may be used by shareholders in the Company as the denominator for the calculations by which they will determine if they are required to notify their interest in, or a change to their interest in the Company, under the ASX Listing Rules or the DTRs.
Following the issue of Shares, Sovereign has the following securities on issue:
· 599,879,879 fully paid ordinary shares;
· 9,460,000 unlisted performance rights subject to the “Definitive Feasibility Study Milestone” expiring on or before 31 October 2025;
· 3,600,000 unlisted performance rights subject to the “Grant of a Mining Licence Milestone” expiring on or before 31 March 2026; and
· 4,800,000 unlisted performance rights subject to the “Final Investment Decision Milestone” expiring on or before 30 June 2026.
Classification: 2.5 Total number of voting rights and capital
ENQUIRIES
Dylan Browne +61(8) 9322 6322 |
Nominated Adviser on AIM and Joint Broker |
|
SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP |
+44 20 3470 0470 |
Ewan Leggat Charlie Bouverat |
|
|
|
Joint Brokers |
|
Stifel |
+44 20 7710 7600 |
Varun Talwar |
|
Ashton Clanfield |
|
|
|
Berenberg |
+44 20 3207 7800 |
Matthew Armitt |
|
Jennifer Lee |
|
|
|
Buchanan |
+ 44 20 7466 5000 |
#GRX GreenX Metals LTD – Acquiring Large Scale Copper Project in Germany
2nd August 2024 / Leave a comment
GREENX TO ACQUIRE LARGE SCALE SEDIMENT-HOSTED COPPER PROJECT IN CENTRAL GERMANY
GreenX Metals Limited (“GreenX” or “Company”) is pleased to advise that it has entered into an Earn-in Agreement through which GreenX can earn a 90% interest in Group 11 Exploration GmbH, a private German company which holds the Tannenberg exploration licence (“Project”) and is highly prospective for sediment-hosted (Kupferschiefer type) copper deposits.
The Project
· The Tannenberg exploration licence covers 272 km2 in the State of Hesse in central Germany, encompassing the historical “Richelsdorf” copper – silver mines.
· Prior to closure in the 1950’s, the Richelsdorf mines produced 416,500 t of copper and 33.7 Moz of silver from Kupferschiefer type deposits. These historic mines consisted of shallow underground workings originally accessed from surface outcrops.
· The Project also contains multiple drill intercepts over the high priority 14 km-long Richelsdorf Dome target, including:
o 2.1 m at 2.7% Cu and 48g/t Ag from 365.48 m; 1.5 m at 3.7% Cu and 33 g/t Ag from 209.50 m; 2.5 m at 1.8% Cu and 19 g/t Ag from 339.5 m in the southwest of the license area.
o 2.0 m at 1.6% Cu and 19 g/t Ag from 268 m in the north-east of the license area.
Figure 1: The Project is located in the industrial centre of Europe.
· Kupferschiefer style deposits are a well-known and prolific subtype of sediment-hosted copper deposit that:
o are the second most prevalent source of copper production and reserves in the world; and
o have been historically mined in Germany and are still mined in Poland where KGHM produced 592 kt of electrolytic copper in 2023.
· Excellent potential for new discoveries of shallow (50 m to 500 m), large scale and high grade Kupferschiefer style copper and silver mineralisation, with much of licence area remaining untested by modern exploration whereby thicker sections of footwall/ hanging wall mineralisation will be targeted.
· Modern understanding of Kupferschiefer mineralisation from prolific mining in Poland places new emphasis on hanging wall and footwall mineralisation, structural controls and metal zonation.
o In Polish Kupferschiefer mines, mineralisation typically forms within the Kupferschiefer shale and in strata up to 60 m below and 30 m above the shale. E.g., KGHM’s Rudna Mine in Poland, where footwall sandstone hosts 80% of the total copper resource, hanging wall limestone hosts 15%, and Kupferschiefer shale hosts only 5%.
GERMANY & EU MINING INDUSTRY
· Germany has been a significant mining jurisdiction in the past and continues its mining tradition, including:
o The K+S potash mines which operate 4 km away from the license area and are located in the State of Hesse.
o Anglo American are actively exploring the Löwenstern and Leine-Kupfer copper projects nearby. Löwenstern is 25 km away to the south in the German state of Thüringia, where drilling targeting the Kupferschiefer commenced in 2023. Leine-Kupfer was granted in January 2024 and is 60 km away to the north in the state of Lower Saxony.
o AMG Graphite operates a graphite mining and processing complex at Kropfmühl near Passau, Bavaria
o Vulcan Energy is successfully permitting lithium brine and geothermal power projects in the German states of Rheinland-Pfalz, Baden-Württemberg, and Hesse.
· Copper is a designated a Strategic Raw Material (“SRM”) under the EU’s Critical Raw Material Act, that entered into force on 23 May 2024. The CRMA signals the EU’s political commitment to strengthen EU supply of SRM’s (including copper) by giving the European Commission the power to designate Strategic Projects that will benefit from easier access to financing, expedited permitting processes and matchmaking with off-takers.
· The manufacturing sector, including the automotive, mechanical engineering, chemical and electrical industries, accounts for over 25% of Germany’s economic output, and 18% of GDP; these figures are significantly higher than in most other advanced economies
o The manufacturing sector provides 16% of national employment, some 8 million jobs, with mechanical engineering being the largest segment and dominated by SMEs.
o The automotive sector is a key industry and with around four million automobiles produced in 2023. Electric Vehicles are being adopted in Germany with numerous OEM’s investing in new production facilities and supply chains, such as Volkswagen’s Battery and Electric Drive production facilities and Tesla’s Berlin Gigafactory.
o Many of these industries are reliant on critical raw materials such as copper.
· German government recently announced creation of a EUR 1.1 billion (A$1.8 billion) investment fund to fortify Germany’s access to SRM’s (including copper) essential for high-tech and green projects. The fund will be managed by the state-owned KfW Development Bank.
GreenX Metals’ Chief Executive Officer, Mr Ben Stoikovich, commented:
“We are very excited to be adding the Tannenberg project to our exploration portfolio. Kupferschiefer style deposits are widely acknowledged as the most prolific source of modern-day copper production, with copper mining from the Polish Kupferschiefer deposits (KGHM) presently being Europe’s largest domestic source of strategic copper supply. We believe that Tanneberg has the potential to host large scale and high-grade copper deposits located in the heartland of German industry in the vicinity of major OEM’s such as Volkswagen’s Battery and Electric Drive production facilities and Tesla’s Berlin Gigafactory.
Copper is officially recognised by the EU as a strategic raw material for European industry and ongoing decarbonisation in Europe. This acquisition comes at a time when the German government and the EU have recently announced major policy initiatives to enhance security of supply of strategic raw materials such as copper by facilitating expedited permitting processes and access to project development funding. Germany, and in particular the State of Hesse, has a well-established mining industry with practical and efficient mine permitting processes. Furthermore, we anticipate increased political support for new copper projects in accordance with Germany’s Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Action critical raw materials policies and the EU’s newly introduced Critical Raw Material Act.
Tannenberg is complementary to our Arctic Rift Copper project in Greenland and provides GreenX shareholders with enhanced exposure to strategic raw materials that are now a policy priority in both Germany and the wider EU. We are looking forward to updating shareholders over the coming months as we commence our exploration activities in Germany.”
Classification: 2.2 Inside Information
2.5 Total number of voting rights and capital
ENQUIRIES
Ben Stoikovich +44 207 478 3900
|
Sapan Ghai +44 207 478 3900
|
SUMMARY OF TERMS
GreenX has entered into an Earn-in Agreement (“Agreement”) through which GreenX can earn a 90% interest in Group 11 Exploration GmbH (“Group 11”). Key terms of the Agreement are as follows:
· GreenX to issue the vendor 500,000 fully paid ordinary shares (“Shares”) upfront.
· GreenX will fund a Work Program up to EUR 500,000 by 31 December 2025 (“Minimum Commitment”). The Work Program will be sufficient to satisfy requirements for the grant of an extension of the exploration license.
· Once the Minimum Commitment has been discharged, GreenX can elect to acquire 90% of the fully diluted share capital of Group 11 on or before 31 December 2025 in return for:
o GreenX paying A$3,000,000 to the vendor in Shares (based on the higher of the 10-day VWAP or A$0.30 per Share).
o The vendors’ 10% interest in Group 11 will then be free carried until completion of a feasibility study by Group 11 or GreenX.
o The Agreement also includes usual drag along and tag along rights, and an Area of Influence provision.
o Once GreenX has earned its 90% interest, the vendor may elect to exchange their remaining 10% interest in return for a 0.5% Net Smelter Royalty.
· If a Scoping Study is published by GreenX on the ASX regarding the license area or any area within the Area of Influence within 5 years of execution of the Agreement, GreenX will issue the vendor 5 million Shares on the completion of the first such Scoping Study.
· GreenX will act as the project manager.
Project Geology
Historical drilling and mine workings confirm the widespread presence of the crucial Kupferschiefer sequence within the Tannenberg licence (Figure 2). The sedimentary sequence forms a broad dome that outcrops near the centre of the licence area and extends down to approximately 500 m at the periphery (Figure 3). Regional and small-scale faults cut the licence area with the dominant orientation trending northwest-southeast, perpendicular to the Variscan Orogen. Zones of copper enrichment within the licence area correspond to fault intersections. Structure is a key targeting consideration at the Project.
Figure 2: The Kupferschiefer is gently folded to form the Richelsdorf Dome that extends from surface down to 500 m depth within the licence area. Historical mining around Richelsdorf exploited mineralisation near the surface. Historical drilling intercepted mineralised Kupferschiefer down to 436 m. Much of the Kupferschiefer between 50 to 500 m remains untested.
Figure 3: Interpreted cross-section through Tannenberg exploration licence with simplified stratigraphy. The historical Richelsdorf District is located at the apex of a large-scale anticline, the Richelsdorf Dome. The approximate extent of historical mining is shown. The cross-section passes between drill holes Ro23 and Ro45.
In the south of the licence area near the town of Ronshausen, drill holes intersected mineralised Kupferschiefer sequence at depths ranging from 211 to 368 m below the surface (e.g., Ro18 and Ro23). Near the town of Nentershausen in the north, an isolated drill hole intersected 2 m at 1.6% Cu (Ro45).
Table 1: Selected Drill Holes.
Locality |
Hole ID |
Intersect (m) |
Cu (%) |
||
From |
To |
Interval |
|||
Ronshausen |
Ro23 |
365.48 |
367.58 |
2.10 |
2.7 |
Ro18 |
209.50 |
211.00 |
1.50 |
3.7 |
|
Ro19 |
339.50 |
342.00 |
2.50 |
1.7 |
|
Ro15 |
285.86 |
289.31 |
3.45 |
1.0 |
|
Nentershausen |
Ro45 |
268.00 |
269.63 |
2.00 |
1.6 |
Historical exploration and sampling might have been too focussed on the Kupferschiefer shale horizon. For example, in Ro45, the isolated drill hit near Nentershausen, the last sample from the footwall assayed at 1% Cu (Figure 4). In bothRo45 and Ro23 shown in Figure 4, the historical sampling only covers one mineralised interval. Drilling at the Rudna Mining in Poland shows that copper mineralisation can occur in multiple intervals, above and below the Kupferschiefer shale.
Figure 4: Selected historical drill results from the Richelsdorf Dome target with comparison to drilling at the Rudna Mine, Poland. Sample coverage did not typically extend much above or below the shale unit.
Kupferschiefer copper deposits feature a distinct metal zonation pattern. The zonation transitions from iron, to copper, lead then zinc (Figure 5). Adjacent to every known copper deposit is the iron rich zone known as “Rote Fäule”, or “red rot” in English. Within the Tannenberg licence, a distinct zone of red rot has been identified in the south near Ronshausen. As well as the copper, historical drill core was also assayed for lead and zinc. This data will allow the Company to identify important metal zonations in the Project area.
Figure 5: Metal zonation pattern associated with Kupferschiefer type copper deposits. The zonation cuts across stratigraphy and progresses from iron to copper, lead, then zinc. Note: hem = hematite, cc = chalcocite, bo = bornite, cpy = chalcopyrite, ga = galena, sph = sphalerite, py = pyrite. Modified from Borg, 2017.
|
GreenX’s exploration hypothesis for the Project is that historical exploration was mainly based on an outdated deposit model that focussed on the 30-60 cm-thick Kupferschiefer shale horizon. Modern understanding of the Kupferschiefer deposit model now shows that up to 95% of mineable copper can be hosted in the footwall sandstone and hanging wall limestone.
Project History
Pre-industrial mining in central Germany dates back to the 12th Century. Copper was exploited from the Kupferschiefer in the Mansfield, Sangerhausen, and Richelsdorf mining districts. Most of the historical copper mining in central Germany was prior to the Industrial Revolution and well-before mechanised mining technology was widely available. Once surface accessible deposits were depleted, adits and shallow shafts were used to access deeper underground Kupferschiefer copper ores (Figure 6).
In the Richelsdorf district, historical production is estimated at 416,500 t of copper and 1,050 t (33.7 Moz) of silver. Production commenced in the 13th Century and ceased in 1955.
The Project area remains ostensibly undeveloped, comprised predominantly of small-holding farmland and woodland, since it was located in the Cold-War border zone between West and East Germany. During the Cold War (1947-1991), the Richelsdorf district sat within the strategically-important Fulda Gap. The Fulda Gap hosts two lowland corridors through which NATO military planners believed the Soviet Union could launch a land attack. The US military observation post “Romeo” was active at the Hesse-Thuringia border in the vicinity of the Project area during the Cold War and was only disbanded in 1991.
Between 1980 and 1987, St Joes Exploration GmbH (“St Joes Exploration”) were active in the region. St Joes Exploration’s drilling campaigns identified Kupferschiefer mineralisation near the towns of Ronshausen and Nentershausen (Appendix 1, Table 2).
The major mining activity in Hesse is potash mining operated by K+S Group, an international fertiliser company with production sites in Europe and North America. The major potash mining complex “Werra” has been operating for over 100 years and produces some 19 Mtpa of crude salt from underground workings between 700 – 1000m depth. K+S Group’s Werra plant is recognised as an important pillar for the economic and demographic development of the region.
In 2021, Anglo American’s ‘Kupfer Copper Germany GmbH’ (“Anglo”) began exploration activities in Thuringia, 25 km from the Tannenberg licence. There, historical drilling intercepted 0.5 m at 1.4% Cu from 761.9 m. Anglo initiated seismic, gravity, and magnetic surveys in 2021 and exploratory drilling in 2023.
Figure 6: Left: Underground extraction of the Kupferschiefer shale at the Wolfsberg mine in 1954. Miners laid on their sides to excavate the ore-bearing material. Right: Schematic of pre-industrial underground mining in Germany.
Modified from Zientek et al., 2015.
EU CrITICAl RAW MATERIAL ACT
On 23 May 2024, the EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act (“CRMA”), published as Regulation (EU) 2024/1252, entered into force following its adoption by the Council of the EU and European Parliament. The main objective of the CRMA is to maintain and establish a secure and sustainable supply of Critical Raw Materials to the EU. The CRMA lists Strategic Raw Materials (SRM’s), which are those most crucial for strategic technologies used for the green, digital, defence and aerospace applications. Copper is a designated a Strategic Raw Material (SRM’s) under the act
The CRMA sets benchmarks for domestic capacities along the strategic raw material supply chain and for diversifying EU supply by 2030:
· EU extraction capacity of at least 10% of the EU’s annual consumption of strategic raw materials;
· EU processing capacity of at least 40% of the EU’s annual consumption of strategic raw materials;
· EU recycling capacity of at least 25% of the EU’s annual consumption of strategic raw materials; and
· Not more than 65% of the Union’s annual consumption of each strategic raw material relies on a single third country for any relevant stage of the value chain.
The CRMA further demonstrates the EU’s political commitment to strengthening supply of SRM’s (including copper) by giving the European Commission the power to designate Strategic Projects that will benefit from easier access to financing, expedited permitting processes and matchmaking with off-takers.
In terms of permitting processes, under the CRMA EU Member States will be required to give priority to Strategic Projects in their administrative processes. The Act sets clear timelines for decisions to be taken on permitting applications linked to Strategic Projects. i.e., for Strategic Projects, the total duration of the permit granting process should not exceed 27 months for extraction projects or 15 months for processing and recycling projects.
To help companies through permitting, Member States are also required to designate single points of contact for critical raw materials projects. The single point of contact will provide guidance to project promoters on administrative issues and will serve as the sole contact point throughout the permit granting process.
Exploration Targeting Model
The Project is prospective for Kupferschiefer style copper-silver mineralisation. Kupferschiefer is a subtype of the sediment-hosted copper deposit model. Mineralisation typically forms around the Kupferschiefer shale, but is known to occur up to 60 m below and 30 m above the shale in Poland (Figure 7). In KGHM’s Rudna Mine in Poland, footwall sandstone hosts 80% of the total resource, hanging wall limestone hosts 15%, and Kupferschiefer shale hosts only 5%. Modern insights from mining the Kupferschiefer in Poland will be applied to our exploration strategy in Germany.
Figure 7: Comparison of current-day Kupferschiefer mining in Poland with historical mining in Germany.
Note: Modified from Zientek et al., 2015.
Historical mining and exploration in Germany mainly focussed on the Kupferschiefer shale unit (Figure 6 & 7). The Company’s exploration hypothesis is that as in Poland, significant footwall and hanging wall accumulations of Kupferschiefer copper are potentially present at the Project.
The historical thinking about Kupferschiefer deposits in Germany was that mineralisation was syngenetic with the sediments. Meaning that the copper was deposited at the same time as the shale. Accordingly, historical mining and exploration was highly focussed on the shale. Modern mining and research challenges the historical deposit model. In Poland, copper is being mined up to 60 m below and 30 m above the Kupferschiefer shale.
The modern understanding of Kupferschiefer mineralisation recognises epigenetic deposition. This means that the copper mineralisation came after the sediments were deposited (Figure 8). Modern Kupferschiefer mining recognises the importance of structures, metal zonation patterns, and footwall and hanging wall host rocks.
Figure 8: Deposit model of Kupferschiefer mineralisation and alteration. Note: Compared to pre-industrial times, copper mineralisation is now known to extend from the hanging wall limestone, through the Kupferschiefer shale, and well into the footwall sandstone. Source: Zientek et al., 2015.
Regional Geological Setting
The Project is hosted in the Southern Permian Basin (“SPB”) of Europe. The SPB is an intracontinental basin that developed on the northern foreland of the Variscan Orogen. Two Groups make up the SPB, the Rotliegend and the Zechstein (Figure 9). The Lower Rotliegend Group marks the boundary between the Permian and Carboniferous and is comprised of bi-modal volcanics with interbedded sedimentary rocks. After a 20- to 30-million-year-long- hiatus, the Upper Rotliegend Group was deposited towards the end of the Permian. The Upper Rotliegend Group strata transitions from terrestrial to a shallow marine environment.
The Zechstein Group formed in the late Permian when the Barents Sea flooded the continental SPB. The organic-rich reduced Kupferschiefer shale marks the base of the Zechstein Group. “Kupferschiefer” is German for “Copper Shale” and is also called “T1” by geologists. The shale is typically 30-60 cm thick but can also be missing from the stratigraphy.
Very high-grade copper mineralisation is generally associated with the Kupferschiefer shale unit. However, minable copper mineralisation also occurs in the footwall sandstone and hanging wall limestone units in Poland. Mineralisation can also be offset from the shale by up to 30 m above and 60 m below. Pre-industrial mining in Germany focussed on the high-grade but thin shale. Modern mining in Poland extracts copper from the footwall sandstone, shale, and hanging wall limestone. Mining intervals at the Rudna mine is 3 m on average but reach over 12 m in places.
Figure 9: Generalised Kupferschiefer stratigraphic sequence from Germany and Poland. Mineralisation can extend below and above the T1 shale. Source: Borg, 2017.
In Poland, copper deposits are hosted in the Fore-Sudetic Monocline, a sub-basin of the SPB. KGHM’s current mining operations take place over multiple adjacent deposits at depths ranging from 844 m to 1,385 m below ground. In 2023, KGHM’s Polish operations produced 592 kt of electrolytic copper and 1,403 t of silver (45.8 Moz).
Upcoming Work Programs
Future work programs at the Project will aid drill targeting. Initially, an in-country search for additional historical drilling and mining records will be undertaken. Geophysical methods such as seismic and magnetic surveys will be evaluated for their effectiveness in delineating subsurface structures at the high-priority Richelsdorf Dome target. Historical drill assays will be used to identify metal zonation patterns useful for exploration targeting. The area of primary interest covers 14 km-long stretch of the Richelsdorf Dome where Kupferschiefer strata outcrop at surface in the centre and extend down to approximately 500 m at the periphery.
A European based technical team will be assembled to manage exploration activities at the Project.
Risk Factors
Whilst GreenX has undertaken a due diligence process (including title and other risks) with respect to the Project, it should be noted that the usual risks associated with companies undertaking exploration and development activities of projects in Germany will remain at completion of the acquisition.
A number of additional risk factors specific to the Project and associated activities have also been identified, including, but not limited to:
(a) The Project is located in Germany, and as such, the operations of the Company will be exposed to related risks and uncertainties associated with the country, regional and local jurisdictions. Opposition to the Project, or changes in local community support for the Project, along with any changes in mining or investment policies or in political attitude in Germany and, in particular to the mining, processing or use of copper, may adversely affect the operations, delay or impact the approval process or conditions imposed, increase exploration and development costs, or reduce profitability of the Company.
(b) The Company’s exploration and any future mining activities are dependent upon the grant, maintenance and/or renewal from time to time of the appropriate title interests, licences, concessions, leases, claims, permits and regulatory consents which may be withdrawn or made subject to new limitations. Maintaining title interests or obtaining renewals of or getting the grant of title interests often depends on the Company being successful in obtaining and maintaining required statutory approvals for its proposed activities (including a licence for mining operations) and that the title interests, licences, concessions leases, claims, permits or regulatory consents it holds will be maintained and when required renewed.
There is no assurance that such title interests, licences, concessions, leases, claims, permits or regulatory consents will be granted, or even if granted, not be revoked, significantly altered or granted on terms or with conditions not acceptable to the Company, or not renewed to the detriment of the Company or that the renewals thereof will be successful.
Shareholders should note that some of the risks may be mitigated by the use of appropriate safeguards and systems, whilst others are outside the control of the Company and cannot be mitigated. Should any of the risks eventuate, then it may have a material adverse impact on the financial performance of the Project, the Company and the value of the Company’s securities.
TENEMENT INFORMATION
Table 2: Tenement information.
Licence Name |
Commodities |
Area (km2) |
Issue Date |
Expiry Date |
Tannenberg
|
1copper, silver 2antimony, arsenic, lead, gallium, germanium, gold, indium, cadmium, cobalt, molybdenum, nickel, palladium, platinum, rhodium, selenium, thallium, vanadium, bismuth, and zinc |
271.92 |
07.06.2022 |
07.06.2025 |
Notes
1 Target commodities
2 Commodities included in the licence
ISSUE OF SHARES
GreenX Metals Limited has today issued 600,000 Shares in relation to the Agreement.
An application will be made for admission of the Shares to the standard listing segment of the Official List of the FCA (Official List) and to trading on the main market of the London Stock Exchange for listed securities (LSE Admission). LSE Admission is expected to take place on or before 9 August 2024.
For the purposes of the Financial Conduct Authority’s Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTRs), following LSE Admission, the Company’s issued ordinary share capital will be 279,501,032 ordinary shares. The above figure of 279,501,032 may be used by shareholders as the denominator for the calculations by which they can determine if they are required to notify their interest in, or a change to their interest in, the Company following LSE Admission
Following the issue of Shares, GreenX has the following securities on issue:
· 279,501,032 ordinary fully paid shares;
· 4,775,000 unlisted options exercisable at A$0.45 each on or before 30 November 2025;
· 5,525,000 unlisted options exercisable at A$0.55 each on or before 30 November 2026; and
· 11,000,000 performance rights that have an expiry date 8 October 2026.
-ENDS-
Competent Persons Statement
Information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Woolrych, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Woolrych is a Director Group 11 Exploration GmbH and will hold an indirect interest in GreenX shares and deferred consideration for the Project. Mr Woolrych has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Woolrych consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
Forward Looking Statements
This release may include forward-looking statements, which may be identified by words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, “plans”, and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on GreenX’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of GreenX, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. GreenX makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.
The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (‘MAR’). Upon the publication of this announcement via Regulatory Information Service (‘RIS’), this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain
1 Production numbers sourced from Zientek et al., 2015, Table 4.
Appendix 1: Exploration Results and JORC Tables
Table 1: Historical drill hole information
Hole ID |
Easting |
Northing |
Elevation (m MSL) |
Dip (°) |
Depth (m) |
Assay available |
Bebra-1 |
4346428 |
5649690 |
n/a |
90 |
n/a |
No |
C/77-B10 |
4353728 |
5660165 |
235 |
90 |
68.2 |
No |
Cornberg |
4349990 |
5658105 |
302 |
90 |
151.6 |
No |
Iba-1 |
4349160 |
5650548 |
n/a |
90 |
n/a |
No |
Iba-3 |
4349120 |
5649684 |
n/a |
90 |
n/a |
No |
Iba-4 |
4348366 |
5649523 |
n/a |
90 |
n/a |
No |
KB1 |
4356129 |
5659867 |
288.83 |
90 |
15 |
No |
Nesselroeden-1 |
4368324 |
5655767 |
252 |
90 |
193.7 |
No |
Obergude |
4339370 |
5662062 |
308.88 |
90 |
200.2 |
Yes |
Ro1 |
4349714 |
5649065 |
n/a |
90 |
n/a |
No |
Ro3 |
4348224 |
5648740 |
n/a |
90 |
n/a |
No |
Ro6 |
4348997 |
5648337 |
n/a |
90 |
n/a |
No |
Ro8 |
4348234 |
5648558 |
n/a |
90 |
n/a |
No |
Ro10 |
4347033 |
5647996 |
n/a |
90 |
n/a |
No |
Ro15 |
4348595 |
5647200 |
255 |
90 |
351 |
Yes |
Ro18 |
4348389 |
5647549 |
235 |
90 |
227 |
Yes |
Ro19 |
4349107 |
5647350 |
280 |
90 |
360.5 |
Yes |
Ro21 |
4348105 |
5647941 |
203 |
90 |
211 |
Yes |
Ro23 |
4347684 |
5647433 |
300 |
90 |
380 |
Yes |
Ro26 |
4347272 |
5647775 |
270 |
90 |
400 |
Yes |
Ro27 |
4346047 |
5649652 |
215 |
90 |
432 |
Yes |
Ro30 |
4347604 |
5647936 |
240 |
90 |
292.3 |
Yes |
Ro31 |
4346844 |
5651396 |
217 |
90 |
159.2 |
Yes |
Ro33 |
4347521 |
5648340 |
205 |
90 |
251.9 |
Yes |
Ro34 |
4347363 |
5651850 |
220 |
90 |
244.75 |
Yes |
Ro36 |
4347359 |
5650524 |
310 |
90 |
320.45 |
Yes |
Ro39 |
4358152 |
5656842 |
200 |
90 |
197.2 |
Yes |
Ro41 |
4346982 |
5647411 |
250 |
90 |
426.2 |
Yes |
Ro42 |
4348170 |
5647070 |
249 |
90 |
307 |
Yes |
Ro45 |
4356946 |
5656716 |
407 |
90 |
289 |
Yes |
Ro46 |
4358278 |
5658088 |
200 |
90 |
228 |
No |
Note: Coordinates are DHDN / 3-degree Gauss-Kruger zone 4.
Table 2: Historical drill hole assays
Hole ID |
Intersect (m) |
Cu (%) |
Ag (ppm) |
||
From |
To |
Interval |
|||
Ro15 |
285.857 |
286.018 |
0.161 |
0.532 |
10 |
Ro15 |
286.018 |
286.068 |
0.05 |
0.846 |
15 |
Ro15 |
286.068 |
286.243 |
0.175 |
0.72 |
13 |
Ro15 |
286.243 |
286.288 |
0.045 |
0.919 |
16 |
Ro15 |
286.288 |
286.388 |
0.1 |
0.638 |
12 |
Ro15 |
286.388 |
286.438 |
0.05 |
0.681 |
13 |
Ro15 |
286.438 |
286.532 |
0.094 |
0.59 |
12 |
Ro15 |
286.532 |
286.619 |
0.087 |
0.562 |
11 |
Ro15 |
286.619 |
286.695 |
0.076 |
0.64 |
12 |
Ro15 |
286.695 |
286.812 |
0.117 |
0.707 |
13 |
Ro15 |
286.812 |
286.942 |
0.13 |
0.811 |
13 |
Ro15 |
286.942 |
287.043 |
0.101 |
0.737 |
11 |
Ro15 |
287.043 |
287.17 |
0.127 |
1.6 |
21 |
Ro15 |
287.17 |
287.272 |
0.102 |
1.437 |
19 |
Ro15 |
287.272 |
287.372 |
0.1 |
0.835 |
13 |
Ro15 |
287.372 |
287.463 |
0.091 |
0.499 |
11 |
Ro15 |
288.021 |
288.093 |
0.072 |
0.313 |
4 |
Ro15 |
288.151 |
288.206 |
0.055 |
0.441 |
5 |
Ro15 |
288.206 |
288.261 |
0.055 |
0.651 |
5 |
Ro15 |
288.261 |
288.281 |
0.02 |
0.506 |
5 |
Ro15 |
288.281 |
288.323 |
0.042 |
0.642 |
6 |
Ro15 |
288.323 |
288.388 |
0.065 |
1.573 |
12 |
Ro15 |
288.388 |
288.472 |
0.084 |
4.708 |
28 |
Ro15 |
288.472 |
288.51 |
0.038 |
3.837 |
24 |
Ro15 |
288.559 |
288.588 |
0.029 |
8.823 |
57 |
Ro15 |
288.588 |
288.623 |
0.035 |
4.774 |
30 |
Ro15 |
288.623 |
288.651 |
0.028 |
4.382 |
32 |
Ro15 |
288.651 |
288.721 |
0.07 |
3.554 |
98 |
Ro15 |
288.721 |
288.763 |
0.042 |
3.511 |
32 |
Ro15 |
288.763 |
288.793 |
0.03 |
2.814 |
28 |
Ro15 |
288.793 |
288.823 |
0.03 |
1.573 |
11 |
Ro15 |
288.823 |
288.865 |
0.042 |
2.313 |
17 |
Ro15 |
288.865 |
288.883 |
0.018 |
0.567 |
7 |
Ro15 |
288.883 |
288.901 |
0.018 |
0.469 |
7 |
Ro15 |
288.901 |
288.972 |
0.071 |
0.645 |
10 |
Ro15 |
288.972 |
289.004 |
0.032 |
0.617 |
8 |
Ro15 |
289.004 |
289.057 |
0.053 |
0.641 |
9 |
Ro15 |
289.057 |
289.117 |
0.06 |
0.523 |
9 |
Ro15 |
289.117 |
289.129 |
0.012 |
0.349 |
0 |
Ro15 |
289.151 |
289.159 |
0.008 |
1.033 |
18 |
Ro15 |
289.159 |
289.169 |
0.01 |
0.641 |
14 |
Ro15 |
289.169 |
289.179 |
0.01 |
0.477 |
15 |
Ro15 |
289.179 |
289.235 |
0.056 |
0.817 |
10 |
Ro15 |
289.235 |
289.257 |
0.022 |
0.312 |
4 |
Ro15 |
289.257 |
289.312 |
0.055 |
0.321 |
4 |
Ro18 |
209.5 |
210 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
20 |
Ro18 |
210 |
210.25 |
0.25 |
7.2 |
70 |
Ro18 |
210.25 |
210.53 |
0.28 |
8.6 |
50 |
Ro18 |
210.53 |
210.76 |
0.23 |
3.3 |
35 |
Ro18 |
210.76 |
211 |
0.24 |
0.3 |
-2 |
Ro19 |
339.5 |
339.71 |
0.21 |
7.6 |
80 |
Ro19 |
339.71 |
340 |
0.29 |
2.5 |
30 |
Ro19 |
340 |
340.5 |
0.5 |
1.5 |
15 |
Ro19 |
340.5 |
341 |
0.5 |
1 |
10 |
Ro19 |
341 |
341.5 |
0.5 |
1.3 |
10 |
Ro19 |
341.5 |
342 |
0.5 |
0.43 |
10 |
Ro21 |
199 |
199.18 |
0.18 |
0.94 |
10 |
Ro21 |
199.18 |
199.4 |
0.22 |
0.49 |
6 |
Ro23 |
365.48 |
366 |
0.52 |
2 |
21 |
Ro23 |
366 |
366.45 |
0.45 |
0.88 |
17 |
Ro23 |
366.45 |
367 |
0.55 |
3.2 |
78 |
Ro23 |
367 |
367.49 |
0.49 |
5 |
80 |
Ro23 |
367.49 |
367.58 |
0.09 |
0.97 |
12 |
Ro26 |
388.3 |
388.48 |
0.18 |
2.1 |
|
Ro26 |
388.48 |
388.72 |
0.24 |
0.88 |
|
Ro26 |
388.72 |
389 |
0.28 |
0.74 |
|
Ro33 |
242.5 |
243.1 |
0.6 |
1.2 |
35 |
Ro33 |
243.1 |
243.5 |
0.4 |
0.31 |
10 |
Ro34 |
196.75 |
197 |
0.25 |
0.45 |
10 |
Ro41 |
414.35 |
414.85 |
0.5 |
0.45 |
10 |
Ro45 |
268 |
268.5 |
0.5 |
0.35 |
2 |
Ro45 |
268.5 |
269 |
0.5 |
2.3 |
25 |
Ro45 |
269 |
269.28 |
0.28 |
4.8 |
75 |
Ro45 |
269.28 |
269.63 |
0.35 |
0.59 |
3 |
Ro45 |
269.63 |
270 |
0.37 |
1 |
5 |
Note: Only assay results equal to or greater than 0.3% copper are reported.
JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 Report
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
Sampling techniques |
Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. |
Due to the historic nature of the drilling results reported herein, it is not possible to comment on the quality of the sampling used to produce the results described. It is known from historic reports that the drill core was sawn. Sampling of ¼ core was conducted during multiple exploration phases between 1980 and 1987 within the licence area by St Joes Exploration GmbH (“St Joes Exploration”). The information shown here was collated from scans of hard copy reports from that era and a State Survey Database. Assays, geological logging and gamma ray logs were conducted by St Joes Exploration. |
|
Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. |
No QAQC was reported. |
|
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. |
Work was not conducted to modern industry standards. |
Drilling techniques |
Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). |
St Joes Exploration · 10 cm drill cores were collected, further specifications are not known. State Survey Database · Unknown drilling techniques. |
Drill sample recovery |
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.
|
Due to the historic nature of the drilling results reported herein, it is not possible to comment on the recoveries achieved at the time. |
|
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. |
Not reported. |
|
Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. |
Not reported. |
Logging |
Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. |
Information available is not appropriate for a Mineral Resource estimate. |
|
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. |
Available logs are qualitative only. |
|
The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. |
The entire hole was logged, the target zone is typically 2 m thick. |
Sub-sampling techniques |
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. |
A reference to ¼ core is reported by St Joes Exploration however this is not specific to every hole/phase. |
and sample preparation |
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. |
N/A |
|
For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. |
N/A |
|
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. |
N/A
|
|
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. |
N/A |
|
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. |
N/A |
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. |
A St Joes Exploration reference reports that geochemical analysis was carried out by Robertson Research Ltd, Wales, however it is not specified if this was for each hole/phase. |
|
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. |
N/A |
|
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. |
N/A |
Verification of sampling and assaying |
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.
|
No verification carried out. |
|
The use of twinned holes. |
No twinned holes. |
|
Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. |
Limited data is available via hard copy reports. Data was digitised by Group 11 Exploration and merged with State/Federal databases. |
|
Discuss any adjustment to assay data. |
N/A |
Location of data points |
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. |
Location accuracy is unknown. The location of holes drilled by St Joes Exploration comes from collar tables in historical reports. All other collar locations come from State/Federal databases. |
|
Specification of the grid system used. |
Latitude and Longitude in degree, minutes and seconds were provided by St Joes Exploration. All drill collar coordinates are reported here in the DHDN / 3-degree Gauss-Kruger zone 4 grid system. |
|
Quality and adequacy of topographic control. |
N/A |
Data spacing and distribution |
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. |
Drillholes within the Ronshausen mineralised area are spaced between 400 – 700m. Outside of this area the drilling is sparce. |
|
Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. |
Not sufficient for the establishment of a JORC compliant resource. |
|
Whether sample compositing has been applied. |
N/A |
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure |
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. |
The target Kupferschiefer layer is flat to slightly dipping, vertical drilling therefore intercepts at right angles and is appropriate. |
|
If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. |
No sampling bias. |
Sample security |
The measures taken to ensure sample security. |
N/A |
Audits or reviews |
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. |
N/A |
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
|
Mineral tenement and land tenure status |
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. |
The “Tannenberg” exploration licence is held 100% by Group 11 Exploration GmbH. The licence was granted on the 7th of June 2022 and is valid for 3 years. The licence is free from overriding royalties and native titles interests. There are historical mine workings within the licence area, but no known historical sites of cultural significance outside of mining. Within and surrounding the licence area, there are environmental protections zones with differing levels of protections. There are small areas identified as Natura 2000 Fauna Flora Habitat Areas and Bird Sanctuaries. Other environmental protection designated areas include Nature Reserves, National Natural Monuments, Landscape Protection Area, and Natural Parks. Based on due diligence and discussions with various stakeholders and consultants, the presence of environmental protection areas does not preclude exploration or eventual mining if conducted in accordance with applicable standards and regulations. The landform across the license area comprises mostly of farmland, forested areas, and small towns and villages. |
|
|
The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. |
The licence is in good standing. |
|
Exploration done by other parties |
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. |
Exploration was carried out by St Joes Exploration (in JV with the Broken Hill Pty Co Ltd later BHP-Utah) between 1980 and 1987. Two projects were undertaken. The Richelsdorf project within the licence area as well as the Spessart-Rhoen project 85 km to the south. Hole IDs starting with ‘Ro’ were drilled by St Joes Exploration. All other drill holes come from State Survey databases with unknown history. Historical mining took place within the licence area. Mining activities ceased in the 1950’s. Comprehensive records of all mine workings are not available to the Company (and may not exist). |
|
Geology |
Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. |
Mineralisation is of the classic Kupferschiefer type (copper slate) within the Permian Zechstein Basin of Germany and Poland. The Zechstein Basin is hosted within the Southern Permian Basin (“SPB”) of Europe. The SPB is an intracontinental basin that developed on the northern foreland of the Variscan Orogen. Very high-grade copper mineralisation is generally associated with the Kupferschiefer shale unit. However, minable copper mineralisation also occurs in the footwall sandstone and hanging wall limestone units in Poland. Mineralisation can be offset from the shale by up to 30 m above and 60 m below. |
|
Drill hole Information |
A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: easting and northing of the drill hole collar elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar dip and azimuth of the hole down hole length and interception depth hole length. |
Appendix 1 contains all relevant drillhole information. |
|
|
If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. |
All available drill collars are provided. The availability of historical assay results are listed in Appendix 1 Table 1. Assay results less than 0.3% Cu are not reported. |
|
Data aggregation methods |
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. |
N/A |
|
|
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. |
N/A |
|
|
The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. |
N/A |
|
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths |
These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. |
Drilling is perpendicular to mineralisation. Detailed sampling was done to lithological contacts on a range of scales from 1-50cm. |
|
|
If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). |
Intercepts are true width. |
|
Diagrams |
Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. |
Appropriate diagrams, including a maps, cross sections, and tables are included in the main body of this announcement. |
|
Balanced reporting |
Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. |
All available results are reported. Only assays above or equal to 0.4% Cu are reported for practical reasons. |
|
Other substantive exploration data |
Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. |
All substantive results are reported. Geological logs and downhole gamma logs are not reported here. |
|
Further work |
The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). |
Infill and step out drilling required to assess the full potential of mineralisation near Ronshausen is planned. The search for additional archive material and historical records will continue. Desktop analysis and drill targeting will be conducted in consultation with subject-matter experts. Geophysical methods (such as seismic, magnetic, electrical, and gravity) will be evaluated and used if deemed appropriate for the project. |
|
|
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. |
These diagrams are included in the main body of this release. |
|
#GRX GreenX Metals LTD – Extension Of Option Agreement for Eleonore North
28th June 2024 / Leave a comment
Extension Of Option Agreement for Eleonore North Gold Project
GreenX Metals Limited (GreenX or the Company) advises that it has agreed an extension of the Option Agreement (Agreement) with Greenfields Exploration Pty Ltd (GEX), to acquire up to 100% of the Eleonore North gold project (Eleonore North or the Project) in eastern Greenland, from 30 June 2024 to 15 July 2024, while GreenX and GEX negotiate to vary the commercial terms of the Agreement.
As previously announced, Eleonore North has the potential to host a reduced intrusion-related gold system” (RIRGS), analogous to large bulk-tonnage deposit types found in Canada including Donlin Creek, Fort Knox and Dublin Gulch.
Gold mineralisation has been documented at the high-priority Noa Pluton prospect within Eleonore North including:
· Geophysical “bullseye” anomaly 6 km wide co-incident with elevated gold mineralisation from historical geochemical sampling.
· Anomalous gold mineralisation associated with quartz veining exposed at surface over a length of up to 15 km.
· Historical sampling includes 4 m chip sample grading 1.93 g/t Au and 1.9% Sb (refer to Appendix 1 of the Company’s announcement on 10 July 2023).
Eleonore North has potential to host large scale, shallow, bulk tonnage gold deposits. Eleonore North remains underexplored, with the existence of a possible RIRGS being a relatively new geological interpretation based on the historical data. Initial field work consists of a seismic survey to determine the depth from surface to the Noa Pluton to aid in drill targeting.
Figure 1: Eleonore North licence area showing the 6km diameter geophysical anomaly co-incident with gold veining visible at surface over some 15km at the high priority Noa Pluton prospect
The Eleonore North license area contains other gold targets as well as copper, antimony and tungsten prospects. At Holmesø there is copper and antimony mineralisation outcropping at surface. Historical mapping and sampling in the 1970s at Holmesø show a prospective horizon between 15 m and 20 m thick, with per cent level grades for both metals.
Eleonore North provides GreenX with gold exposure in Greenland and complements GreenX’s existing exploration prospect in Greenland, the ARC. There are significant synergies with regards to personnel, logistics and equipment in having multiple exploration projects in Greenland. Field works were conducted during the 2023 field season at Eleonore North, with data collected from the seismic survey presently being analysed to inform follow-on exploration program design.
Greenland is a mining friendly jurisdiction with strong Government support for expanding its mining industry, simple laws and regulations, and a competitive fiscal regime.
The primary target in Eleonore North is the Noa Pluton, followed by the Holmesø prospect and its source intrusion. The Noa Veins provide a near-term drill target, however, the Company’s 2023 field work was focussed on determining the depth of the causative intrusion with greater precision using a passive seismic survey. Once analysed, this information will validate the magnetic interpretation, provide more certainty for a future exploration program, and help identify the size of the intrusion within the well-defined hornfels.
|
|
Figure 2: Map of Greenland showing GreenX’s ARC and Eleonore North license areas |
Figure 3: Map showing prospects and geological features within the Eleonore North license areas |
–ENDS–
Competent Persons Statement
The information in this report that relates to exploration results were extracted from the ASX announcement dated 10 July 2023 which is available to view at www.greenxmetals.com.
GreenX confirms that (a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; (b) all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the content in the relevant announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and (c) the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original announcement.
#FCM First Class Metals PLC – Operations Update – Field Work Commenced
18th June 2024 / Leave a comment
First Class Metals PLC (“First Class Metals” “FCM” or the “Company”) the UK listed metals exploration company seeking economic metal discoveries across its extensive land holdings, remains focused in northern Ontario, Canada, is pleased to announce that field work is now underway.
Highlights
- Sunbeam property, porphyry focus:
o review and sampling of the Nuinsco core.
o review of historic TerraX core approximately 1,500m.
- Instructed Prospectair to commence a High-resolution magnetic survey of the Kerrs Gold property block.
- Zigzag Critical Metals Property-Exploration Permit application submitted.
- Ontario Junior Exploration Programme, (OJEP), application submitted for work on the North Hemlo Property.
.
- Reconnaissance trip to the Quinlan lithium property.
- Planning for stripping programme at the Dead Otter trend, North Hemlo.
- Prospecting at Coco East
Marc Sale First Class Metals CEO Commented:
“I am, as ever, enthusiastic with the speed at which FCM has started the field season, all thanks to EGS support. The review of the Sunbeam Property core, the geophysics survey over Kerrs and the preparation for work at Dead Otter herald an exciting field season for First Class.”
Sunbeam Property historic core review
Whilst a review of the Nuinsco core was previously conducted by FCM through Emerald Geological Services (EGS), the identification of reportable gold values in the host rock – a felsic porphyry, has significant upside for a radicle re-rate of the potential for additional mineralisation on the Property. Accordingly, after exhaustive searching EGS located the TerraX core. TerraX undertook several short drill campaigns over many of the prospects on the Sunbeam property.
Background:
In 2010, TerraX drilled five diamond drill holes (SP10-01 to SP10-05) totalling 661.5m in the Pettigrew area. The first four holes targeted chargeability highs from an IP/Resistivity survey, results were anomalous but not ‘high grade’. The main structure was not drilled.
In 2011, TerraX drilled three holes (SP11-06 to SP11-08) spaced 50 m apart along the trend of quartz vein system and the mineralised zone encountered by Nahanni, the ‘Road Zone’. (In 1982, Nahanni Mines drilled an intersection at the Road zone of 4.8 g/t over 8.5m, including 15.8 g/t Au over 1.8m). The alteration zone in TerraX hole SP11-06 returned an intersection 1.11 g/t Au over 13.90 m.
At the WN12 occurrence, early 2012, three holes (SP12-14 to SP12-16) were drilled. The first two holes tested the 65m intermittently mineralised stripped outcrop with hole SP12-15 intersecting 18.0 g/t Au over 0.95m in the footwall zone.
At Roy, two holes, SP11-12 intersected 4.01 g/t Au over 1.85m. SP11-13 intersected 1.05 g/t Au over 3.78m, see figure 01.
Figures 01, TerraX core from the Roy zone showing gold grade in the porphyry ‘wall rock’.
The stripping at the Roy zone reported high grade gold intersections as well as gold in the porphyry, highlights previously reported:
- Results from the stripping at Roy have confirmed high grade gold assays up to 18.8 g/t gold (Au) / 0.3m channel sample at Roy.
Other highlights include:
- 6.27 g/t Au channel / 0.35m in mafic schist with quartz veinlets;
- 4.98 g/t Au channel / 0.5m in sheared porphyry; and
- 5.58g/t Au channel / 0.5m within a quartz vein.
The total number of samples for assay (with blanks and standards) will be in the order of 90+ samples, over 80 being new half core samples
Kerrs Gold property
Prospectair have been commissioned to undertake a low level hi-resolution magnetic survey over the property in late June / July.
The survey will be carried out with 50m traverse lines oriented in order to properly map the dominant magnetic/geological strike. Control lines will be flown perpendicular to traverse lines and at a 500 m line spacing. This gives a total survey distance of 736 l-km.
The road accessible Kerrs Gold Deposit consists of 36 units totalling approximately 665 hectares and lies 90 kilometres east-northeast of Timmins, in the Larder Lake Mining Division.
Geologically the Project is located in the Abitibi Greenstone Gold Belt. Initially drilled in the 1980’s, with further drilling in the early to late-2000’s and early 2011. The drilling database was used to calculate the 2011 historic resource estimate, with further drilling completed after the release of the estimate, see figure 02.
Figure 02 at property scale showing the significant historical sampling as well as the drill grid.
The Kerrs Gold deposit is considered a stratabound deposit, occurring at the contact of a thick, mafic pillow flow sequence overlying an ultramafic, magnetite-rich flow sequence. Drilling has traced the main zone eight hundred metres and remains open in both directions and at depth.
Gold mineralisation occurs as pyritized quartz vein replacement breccias enveloped by quartz fuchsite carbonate vein breccias averaging approximately 10m and alteration envelopes varying up to 40 m in thickness.
The Kerrs Gold historical resources estimate of 386,467 Oz Au was disclosed in “NI 43-101 Resource Estimation on the Kerr’s Gold Deposit, Matheson, Ontario” prepared for Sheltered Oak Resources Inc. by Garth Kirkham, P. Geo of Kirkham Geosystems Ltd. And dated June 10, 2011.
The Kerrs historic estimate is an inferred resource as defined in National Instrument 43-101. The table below shows the potential ounces with differing cut of grades. FCM would look at remodelling the resource in order to identify higher grade envelopes for targeting in any proposed future drilling.
Kerrs Resources
Estimate Cut-Off Grade |
TONNES | GOLD (g/t) | Metal
(OZ.) |
0.5 | 7,041,460 | 1.71 | 386,467 |
1 | 5,237,213 | 2.04 | 342,856 |
1.5 | 3,375,361 | 2.47 | 268,468 |
2 | 1,936,189 | 3.04 | 188,972 |
2.5 | 1,165,664 | 3.57 | 133,778 |
3 | 818,171 | 3.94 | 103,622 |
Zigzag Exploration Permit
The updated exploration permit (“Permit”) for the Zigzag property has been submitted to the Ontario Ministry of Mines with the full support of Whitesand First Nation community.
The new Permit will allow further stripping and drilling along the main trend both to the easy and west of the ‘core 400m zone’. Importantly it will also allow initial stripping and if warranted allows for drilling on the southern, possibly subparallel trend.
Highlights from the pre-Christmas drilling included:
- Assay results from the recent drill programme are in line with and exceed the channel sample results.
- Selected highlights include:
- ZIG-23-01 4.3m @ 1.65% Lithium (Li20) including 1m at 2.93%
- ZIG-23-02 5.0m @ 1.5% Li20 including 0.2m @ 5.19% and 5.75m @ 0.21% Rb20
- ZIG-23-07 6.5m @ 1.09% Li20 including 0.5m @ 2.76%
- Elevated grades of several key technology critical metals present including: gallium (Ga), rubidium (Rb20), caesium (Ca) and tantalum (Ta).
- Significant upside for the expansion of the geochemical envelope along strike in both directions and down dip.
Ontario Junior Exploration Program (OJEP) 2024 Intake
The recently opened (8 May 2024) intake for OJEP closed on 5 June 2024. FCM has successfully submitted an application for the grant with the focus being the auriferous Dead Otter trend on the flagship North Hemlo property. FCM has twice been awarded the maximum OJEP grant of CAD$200,000.
Quinlan lithium prospect
The Quinlan property, containing ninety-eight claims covering about 20km2 is the subject of an earn in Option to Purchase agreement with Broken Rock Resources. The property contains an extremely anomalous lithium value from a lake sediment sampled collected during a government sampling programme. EGS recently undertook a reconnaissance exercise in order to ascertain the possibility of ground access rather than a helicopter supported field campaign.
Dead Otter trend, North Hemlo
The Dead Otter trend on the North Hemlo claim block extends for 3km from the historic showing in the northwest (3.1ppm Au and 0.59% Mo) to the ’19 grammer’ in the southeast. Other gold occurrences as well as anomalous ‘pathfinder’ elements are reported along thee 3km strike. The structure is discontinuous as outcrop is intermittent.
Figure 03, the Dead Otter trend at North Hemlo with the significantly anomalous geochemistry along 3km of strike.
FCM plans to undertake a stripping programme in the area of the Dead Otter showing, the ’19 grammer’ as well as one or two locations along strike.
Given the potential for ‘coarse gold’ in the Dead Otter sector of the structure FCM is identifying up to thirty samples for photon assay for gold with ALS Thunder Bay.
Other activities
McInnes Lake
EGS has elected not to continue with the Earn in Option over McInnes lake. After discussions FCM has agreed to cease negotiations.
Coco East
FCM also intends to undertake a reconnaissance / prospecting programme in the northern sector of the Coco Este property where we interpret the metalliferous belts extends from the west on to the property.
For further information, please contact:
James Knowles, Executive Chairman |
07488 362641 |
|
Marc J Sale, CEO |
07711 093532 |
Novum Securities Limited
(Financial Adviser)
David Coffman/ George Duxberry |
www.novumsecurities.com |
(0)20 7399 9400 |
#FCM First Class Metals PLC – Suspension of Listing
1st May 2024 / Leave a comment
First Class Metals PLC (“First Class Metals” “FCM” or the “Company”) the UK listed metals exploration company seeking economic metal discoveries across its extensive Canadian, focused in northern Ontario, land holdings, would like to provide an update regarding the delay to the publication of its consolidated audited results for the financial year ended 31 December 2023.
In accordance with the FCA’s Listing Rules and the Disclosure and Transparency Rules, the Company is required to publish its audited results for the year to 31 December 2023 by 30 April 2024. The Company’s auditor, Royce Peeling Green Limited (“RPG”), has advised the Company that the audit process is near completion however it could not be finalised by the 30 April 2024 deadline.
The Company will continue to work closely with RPG to ensure that the audited results for the year ended 31 December 2023 are published as soon as possible.
As a result of this delay, the Company’s shares will be temporarily suspended with effect from 1 May 2024. The Company will request a restoration of the listing of its listing shares following the publication the audited results.
Ends
For further information, please contact:
James Knowles, Executive Chairman |
07488 362641 |
|
Marc J Sale, CEO |
07711 093532 |
Novum Securities Limited
(Financial Adviser)
David Coffman/ George Duxberry |
www.novumsecurities.com |
(0)20 7399 9400 |
#SVML Sovereign Metals LTD – Follow-Up Drilling Initiated North of Kasiya
27th March 2024 / Leave a comment
FOLLOW-UP DRILLING INITIATED NORTH OF KASIYA RESOURCE AREA
· Wide-spaced regional follow-up drilling for the Kasiya Project underway focusing on the region to the north of the current resource footprint, with results from the drill program expected in the coming weeks
· Recently reported reconnaissance drilling to the south identified an 8km extension of mineralisation which remains open along strike and at depth
· Kasiya is already the largest natural rutile deposit and second-largest flake graphite deposit in the world
· Kasiya’s current MRE of 1.8 Billion tonnes at 1.0% rutile and 1.4% graphite comprises broad and contiguous zones of high-grade rutile and graphite that occur across an area of over 201km2
· Optimisation program for the Kasiya Project continues in conjunction with our strategic investor, Rio Tinto
Sovereign Metals Limited (ASX:SVM; AIM:SVML) (the Company or Sovereign) is pleased to report that the Company has initiated a follow-up 400 metre spaced drill program at its tier one Kasiya Rutile-Graphite Project (Kasiya) in Malawi. The program will focus on determining the boundaries and extent of mineralisation north of the known Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) area.
The 70+ hole hand-auger drill program has been designed to target areas where mineralisation was identified in earlier wide-spaced regional hand-auger drilling. The target area is up to 20km north of the current MRE boundary. Drilling is currently underway and will be completed in the coming weeks. Four hand-auger teams have been deployed under the supervision of Sovereign’s in-country technical team.
Samples will be initially processed in the Company’s Lilongwe own lab facility and then shipped for final analysis at certified international laboratories. Results from the drill program are expected in the coming weeks.
SOUTHERN EXTENSION
In February 2024, the Company announced regional hand-auger drilling south of the Kasiya MRE footprint had identified significant strike extensions of approximately 8km across a number of parallel mineralised zones ranging from 400m to 2km in width.
All newly defined mineralisation in the south remains open at depth due to the limitations of the hand-auger drilling method but are expected to continue to the saprock boundary normally between 20 and 30 vertical metres from surface. The multiple mineralised zones identified remain open along strike both to the north and south.
These results indicate the potential to expand the already significant, high-grade rutile and graphite MRE at Kasiya.
Figure 1: Southern mineralised extensions at Kasiya
ENQUIRIES
Frank Eagar (South Africa/Malawi) +61(8) 9322 6322 |
Sam Cordin (Perth) |
Sapan Ghai (London)
|
Nominated Adviser on AIM and Joint Broker |
|
SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP |
+44 20 3470 0470 |
Ewan Leggat Charlie Bouverat Harry Davies-Ball |
|
|
|
Joint Brokers |
|
Stifel |
+44 20 7710 7600 |
Varun Talwar |
|
Ashton Clanfield |
|
|
|
Berenberg |
+44 20 3207 7800 |
Matthew Armitt |
|
Jennifer Lee |
|
|
|
Buchanan |
+ 44 20 7466 5000 |
Competent Person Statement
The information in this announcement that relates to the Exploration Results is extracted from the announcement dated 1 February 2024 entitled ‘Extensions to Rutile & Graphite Mineralisation at Kasiya’. which is available to view at www.sovereignmetals.com.au. Sovereign confirms that a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; b) all material assumptions included in the original announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in this announcement have not been materially changed from the original announcement.
The information in this announcement that relates to the Mineral Resource Estimate is extracted from an announcement dated 5 April 2023 entitled ‘Kasiya Indicated Resource Increased by over 80%’ which is available to view at www.sovereignmetals.com.au and is based on, and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Richard Stockwell, a Competent Person, who is a fellow of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Mr Stockwell is a principal of Placer Consulting Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. The original announcement is available to view on www.sovereignmetals.com.au. Sovereign confirms that a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; b) all material assumptions included in the original announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in this announcement have not been materially changed from the original announcement.
The information in this announcement that relates to Production Targets, Ore Reserves, Processing, Infrastructure and Capital Operating Costs, Metallurgy (rutile and graphite) is extracted from an announcement dated 28 September 2023 entitled ‘Kasiya Pre-Feasibility Study Results’ which is available to view at www.sovereignmetals.com.au and is based on, and fairly represents information compiled by . Sovereign confirms that: a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; b) all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the Production Target, and related forecast financial information derived from the Production Target included in the original announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in this presentation have not been materially modified from the original announcement.
Ore Reserve for the Kasiya Deposit |
|
||||||
Classification |
Tonnes |
Rutile Grade |
Contained Rutile |
Graphite Grade (TGC) (%) |
Contained Graphite |
RutEq. Grade* |
|
Proved |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
|
Probable |
538 |
1.03% |
5.5 |
1.66% |
8.9 |
2.00% |
|
Total |
538 |
1.03% |
5.5 |
1.66% |
8.9 |
2.00% |
|
* RutEq. Formula: Rutile Grade x Recovery (100%) x Rutile Price (US$1,484/t) + Graphite Grade x Recovery (67.5%) x Graphite Price (US$1,290/t) / Rutile Price (US$1,484/t). All assumptions are taken from the PFS ** Any minor summation inconsistencies are due to rounding
Kasiya Total Indicated + Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate at 0.7% rutile cut-off grade |
|||||
Classification |
Resource |
Rutile Grade |
Contained Rutile |
Graphite Grade (TGC) (%) |
Contained Graphite |
Indicated |
1,200 |
1.0% |
12.2 |
1.5% |
18.0 |
Inferred |
609 |
0.9% |
5.7 |
1.1% |
6.5 |
Total |
1,809 |
1.0% |
17.9 |
1.4% |
24.4 |
Forward Looking Statement
This release may include forward-looking statements, which may be identified by words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, “plans”, and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on Sovereign’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Sovereign, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Sovereign makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.
#FCM First Class Metals PLC – Zigzag Drilling Results
29th February 2024 / Leave a comment
First Class Metals PLC (“First Class Metals” “FCM” or the “Company”) the UK listed metals exploration company seeking economic metal discoveries across its extensive Canadian Schreiber-Hemlo, Sunbeam and Zigzag land holdings is delighted to announce the results of an inaugural drilling programme on the Company’s Zigzag Property, (the “Property”) located in the Seymour-Falcon corridor in northwestern Ontario, Canada.
HIGHLIGHTS
· Assay results from the recent drill programme are in line with and exceed the channel sample results.
Selected highlights include:
o ZIG-23-01 4.3m @ 1.65% Lithium (Li20) including 1m at 2.93%
o ZIG-23-02 5.0m @ 1.5% Li20 including 0.2m @ 5.19% and 5.75m @ 0.21% Rb20
o ZIG-23-07 6.5m @ 1.09% Li20 including 0.5m @ 2.76%
· Elevated grades of several key technology critical metals present including: gallium (Ga), rubidium (Rb20) , caesium (Ca) and tantalum (Ta).
· Significant upside for the expansion of the geochemical envelope along strike in both directions and down dip.
· Initial geochemical results indicate the probable existence of a second structure.
· An Exploration Permit to allow additional stripping and drilling on the Property is being drafted.
Marc J Sale Chief Executive Officer Commented- “The results from our first drill programme at Zigzag are first class and have not only confirmed our belief in the potential of the ‘core zone’, but have also significantly exceeded our expectations for the Property. The associated critical metals identified have added another dimension to the Property’s potential. Obviously more work is required specifically along strike and further exploration of the southern structure, hence we are to initiate discussion regarding a new Exploration Permit.
Zigzag is growing as a significant lithium and critical metal play in this rapidly emerging pegmatite district.”
A focussed drill programme of under 500m in 10 NQ diamond drillholes was completed in late December and all the geochemical assay results are now available. Nine of the holes were targeted at the pegmatite with two ‘step-back’ holes and a 10th being drilled as a scissor. All targeted holes successfully intersected the pegmatite.
The drilling has vindicated the channel sampling as well as extended the geochemical and geological knowledge of the structure hosting the pegmatite, (see Map 1). The most easterly and westerly holes indicate the structure remains open along strike and importantly the successful step-back holes show the structure continues and remains open at depth.
The Company will now look to initiate the next most appropriate plan of exploration which will be focussed to extend strike and delineate the recently discovered southern structure.
Map 1 showing the drill traces of the 10 holes drilled as well as their locations relative to the previous channel sampling.
Significant intersections for the drill programme appear in table 1, see below
Drill Hole |
Metal |
Depth From |
Width |
Grade |
ZIG-23-01 |
Li₂O |
12.7m |
4.3m |
1.65% |
incl. |
1.0m |
2.93% |
||
Rb₂O |
11.7m |
5.3m |
0.21% |
|
ZIG-23-02 |
Li₂O |
15.0m |
5.0m |
1.5% |
incl. |
0.2m |
5.19% |
||
Rb₂O |
14.25m |
5.75m |
0.21% |
|
incl. |
0.3m |
0.54% |
||
Cs |
14.25m |
3.25m |
132 ppm |
|
incl. |
0.25m |
430 ppm |
||
Ta |
14.0m |
6.8m |
90 ppm |
|
incl. |
0.2m |
235 ppm |
||
Ga |
15.5m |
0.2m |
144 ppm |
|
ZIG-23-03 |
Li₂O |
14.7m |
0.75m |
2.1% |
Rb₂O |
12.6m |
2.1m |
0.16% |
|
Cs |
12.0m |
5.0m |
151 ppm |
|
incl. |
0.45m |
480 ppm |
||
Ta |
12.6m |
3.9m |
164 ppm |
|
incl. |
0.45m |
624 ppm |
||
Ga |
21.9m |
0.25m |
127 ppm |
|
and |
||||
ZIG-23-03 |
Li₂O |
28.4m |
1.6m |
0.46% |
Rb₂O |
27.8m |
2.2m |
0.17% |
|
ZIG-23-04 |
Li₂O |
20.0m |
1.6m |
0.79% |
Rb₂O |
20.0m |
1.6m |
0.21% |
|
Ta |
15.3m |
7.8m |
165 ppm |
|
incl. |
1.0m |
347 ppm |
||
ZIG-23-05 |
Li₂O |
7.6m |
6.0m |
1.13% |
incl. |
1.0m |
2.17% |
||
Rb₂O |
5.7m |
3.8m |
0.16% |
|
Ta |
4.8m |
9.9m |
167 ppm |
|
incl. |
0.4m |
401 ppm |
||
ZIG-23-06 |
Li₂O |
28.8m |
2.2m |
1.09% |
|
incl. |
0.3m |
2.26% |
|
Rb₂O |
28.8m |
2.2m |
0.19% |
|
ZIG-23-07 |
Li₂O |
9.9m |
6.5m |
1.09% |
incl. |
0.5m |
2.76% |
||
Rb₂O |
10.4m |
6.6m |
0.21% |
|
incl. |
1.0m |
0.41% |
||
Cs |
13.0m |
4.0m |
126 ppm |
|
Ta |
9.0m |
7.4m |
131 ppm |
|
incl. |
0.6m |
177 ppm |
||
ZIG-23-08 |
Li₂O |
65.5m |
3.0m |
1.28% |
Rb₂O |
65.5m |
3.4m |
0.11% |
|
Ga |
65.5m |
3.0m |
98 ppm |
|
incl |
1.0m |
114 ppm |
||
ZIG-23-09 |
Li₂O |
47.25m |
4.75m |
0.52% |
incl. |
0.8m |
1.06% |
||
Rb₂O |
47.25m |
4.75m |
0.14% |
Table 1 assays from the (nine) hole drill programme at Zigzag, every hole had reportable intersections of Li₂O with significant ‘credits’ from the accessory critical elements / metals, specifically rubidium oxide, Rb₂O.
Map 2 showing the relative position of the ‘core’ drill area and the soil sample lines as well as the geochemistry indicating the potential for a second subparallel structure to the south.
The combined geochemical data that the initial grab samples (RNS 31 October 2023), the subsequent channel sampling programme (RNS 28 November 2023) and the recent MMI soil survey (RNS 7 February 2024) support the belief that the ‘core 400m zone’ contains a significant structure of >1% Li₂O and is open along strike. As previously reported, both the most eastern and western holes of the recent drilling programme intersected pegmatite. The soil sample results further suggest that the mineralisation is open in both directions.
Furthermore, there is strong geochemical support for a sub parallel trend about 200m to the south of the Main Zone. Additional work is needed to expand and confirm the anomalism identified. As well follow up sampling is required to confirm the presence of a possible third trend currently identified in anomalous rare element results in grab samples.
Critical Technology Metals @ Zigzag
While the focus of the project remains on the lithium component, the presence of elevated levels of Rb₂O (peak 0.54% over 0.3m within interval of 5.75m @ 0.21% (2100 g/t) in hole ZIG-23-02), Caesium (peak 480 g/t over 0.45m within interval of 5.00m @ 151 g/t in hole ZIG-23-03), Gallium, and Tantalum (peak 624 g/t over 0.45m within interval of 164g/t over 3.9m in hole ZIG-23-03-03) are potentially a significant ‘credit’ to the metallurgy of any resource identified.
These speciality metals have been classified as 1 & 2 ‘Critical Metals’ by the USA and Canadian Governments, highlighting their significance usage in modern technology due to their crucial role in various electronic, semi-conductor, and military hardware. Currently China dominates world production and supply of all these elements.
Despite the limited market for specialty metals, it is noteworthy that Rubidium has recently demonstrated a strong price performance, with trading prices exceeding $3100 per ounce on the Shanghai Metals Market3. Recognizing the potential economic benefits and value-added by these specialty technology metals, First Class intends to conduct further investigations into their possibilities and explore their impact on the overall value of the project.
3https://www.metal.com/Other-Minor-Metals/202012250003
Ends
For further information, please contact:
James Knowles, Executive Chairman |
07488 362641 |
|
Marc J Sale, CEO |
07711 093532 |
Novum Securities Limited
(Financial Adviser)
David Coffman/ George Duxberry |
www.novumsecurities.com |
(0)20 7399 9400 |
Qualified Person
The technical disclosures contained in this announcement have been drafted in line with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum standards and guidelines and approved by Marc J. Sale, who has more than 30 years in the gold exploration industry and is considered a Qualified person owing to his status as a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
#FCM First Class Metals PLC – Zigzag-Further Lithium & Critical Metal trend
7th February 2024 / Leave a comment
First Class Metals PLC (“First Class Metals” “FCM” or the “Company”) the UK listed metals exploration company seeking economic metal discoveries across its extensive Canadian Schreiber-Hemlo, Sunbeam and Zigzag land holdings is pleased to announce the results of a mobile metal ion (MMI) soil sampling programme as well as accompanying rock-grab samples on the Company’s Zigzag Property , (the “Property”) located in the Seymour-Falcon corridor in northwestern Ontario, Canada.
Soil samples were collected along six north-north-west to south-south-east soil sample lines between 100-200m in length, with 12.5m sample station spacing (see Map 1). These included four lines along strike to the west and east of the main 400m ‘core zone’ which was subject to the drilling campaign in December 2023. A further two lines starting ~200m orthogonal to the dominant strike and to the south of the trend of the main zone were sampled. All soil samples were analysed using the Mobile Metal Ion (MMI) method of SGS Labs.
The sample results support the belief that the ‘core 400m zone’ is open along strike. As previously reported, both the most eastern and western holes of the recent drilling programme intersected pegmatite. The soil sample results further confirm the mineralisation is open.
HIGHLIGHTS
· The results from 64 rock-grab and 68 soil samples collected late last year are now available.
· Soil sampling lines to the east west of the core section show anomalous lithium (Li) ratios.
· Results from soil lines 200m to the south of the ‘Main zone’ indicate the probability of a second subparallel structure.
· Grab samples anomalous in Li and other pegmatite associated elements indicate a possible third trend.
· Assay results from the recent drill programme are anticipated in the coming days.
Marc J Sale Chief Executive Officer Commented- “The results from this combined sampling programme validate the belief by FCM that the ‘Main Zone’; is open along strike for a considerable distance. Furthermore, the strong evidence of a second structure to the south with the possibility of a third structure compels FCM to engage in discussions with the First Nations to initiate the application for an Exploration Permit to be able to fully evaluate these new zones”.
Map 1, showing the location of the MMI samples as well as the response ratio (RR) for caesium, (Cs) which overall is the most representative of the anomalism. Note[1]: values are generally considered anomalous when the response ratio is above 5.
RR Response Ratio Highlights from MMI sampling
· Highest lithium (“Li”) response ratio (“RR”) of 11 obtained ~100m along strike to the east of the eastern most DDH from December 2023 (ZIG-23-07).
· Highest caesium (“Cs”) RRs of 15 and 30 obtained at consecutive stations ~100m along strike to the west of the western extent of sampling on the main zone.
· Li RRs up to 10 on the southern lines.
· Multiple MMI anomalies in other elements, especially on the eastern and southern lines, zinc RRs up to 40, silver up to 50, molybdenum up to 51, copper up to 21.
[1] According to SGS Labs, response ratios generally need to be greater than 2-5 to be considered anomalous. https://www.sgs.com/en-ca/-/media/sgscorp/documents/corporate/brochures/sgs-minerals-mmi-tb-23-processing-and-presenting-mmi-geochemical-data.cdn.en-CA.pdf
Grab Samples
· Grab samples of pegmatite at two sites 200-250m across strike to the south of the main zone returned up to: 2600 ppm Li; 4290 ppm Rubidium; 920 ppm Cs (highest value of 2023 sampling); and 686 ppm Tantalum. Sampled dykes could represent offshoots of a parallel zone to the main zone.
· Grab samples of pegmatite ~500m across strike to the south of the eastern extension of the main zone, near the eastern property boundary, returned up to 186 ppm Li; 1240 ppm Rb; 102 ppm Cs, potentially a third structure.
Coleman Robertson, Project Geologist from Emerald Geological Services commented– “There is compelling geochemical evidence to indicate that a second subparallel trend at Zigzag could be present.“
The combined results of both the soil sampling programme and the associated ‘grab’ samples support the belief that the ‘core zone/ Main zone’ that was drilled in December is open to both the west and east.
Furthermore, there is strong geochemical support for a sub parallel trend about 200m to the south of the Main Zone. Additional work is needed to expand and confirm the anomalism identified. As well follow up sampling is required to confirm the presence of a possible third trend currently identified in anomalous rare element results in grab samples.
A significant silver anomaly was identified over the two eastern most MMI lines off the Main Zone. This also requires further investigation.
Ends
For further information, please contact:
James Knowles, Executive Chairman |
07488 362641 |
|
Marc J Sale, CEO |
07711 093532 |
Novum Securities Limited
(Financial Adviser)
David Coffman/ George Duxberry |
www.novumsecurities.com |
(0)20 7399 9400 |
Qualified Person
The technical disclosures contained in this announcement have been drafted in line with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum standards and guidelines and approved by Marc J. Sale, who has more than 30years in the gold exploration industry and is considered a Qualified person owing to his status as a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
#SVML Sovereign Metals LTD – Extensions To Rutile & Graphite Mineralisation
1st February 2024 / Leave a comment
EXTENSIONS TO RUTILE & GRAPHITE MINERALISATION AT KASIYA
· Wide-spaced regional reconnaissance drilling, outside the current JORC (2012) compliant Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) area, identifies a 8km extension of mineralisation to the south which remains open along strike and at depth
· Results are testament to the world-class scale of the Kasiya deposit and demonstrate potential for a future increase of the Kasiya’s MRE, which is already the largest natural rutile deposit and second largest flake graphite deposit in the world
· Kasiya’s current MRE of 1.8 Billion tonnes at 1.0% rutile and 1.4% graphite comprises broad and contiguous zones of high-grade rutile and graphite that occur across an area of over 201km2
· Current focus at Kasiya remains the ongoing Optimisation Study alongside strategic investor Rio Tinto and permitting work streams working with the Malawian Interministerial Committee
Sovereign Metals Limited (ASX:SVM; AIM:SVML) (the Company or Sovereign) is pleased to report southern extensions to the mineralised area at Kasiya. Hand-auger drilling has identified a number of zones ranging from ~400m to 2km wide over a strike length of approximately 8km. These results indicate potential to expand the already significant, high-grade rutile and graphite Mineral Resource Estimate at Kasiya.
Results of the Pre Feasibility Study (PFS) released in late 2023 demonstrated Kasiya’s potential to become the world’s largest rutile producer at an average of 222kt per annum and one of the world’s largest natural graphite producers outside of China at an average of 244kt per annum based on an initial 25 year life-of-mine (LOM).
The Kasiya PFS delivered compelling economics with a post-tax NPV8 of US$1.6 Billion and post-tax IRR of 28%. This long-life, multi-generational operation was modelled to initially generate over US$16 Billion of revenue and provide an average annual EBITDA of US$415 Million per annum.
The PFS modelling was limited to only 25 years with an initial Probable Ore Reserves declared of 538Mt, only representing 30% of the total Mineral Resource Estimate.
Managing Director, Frank Eagar commented: “These drilling results re-confirm the significant scale of the Kasiya deposit with the strike now stretching over 37km long. Sovereign continues to test the extent of regional mineralisation via low-cost hand-auger drilling, which has the potential to increase the already very large Kasiya Resource.”
Classification 2.2: This announcement includes Inside Information
ENQUIRIES
Frank Eagar (South Africa/Malawi) +61(8) 9322 6322 |
Sam Cordin (Perth) |
Sapan Ghai (London)
|
||
Nominated Adviser on AIM and Joint Broker |
|
|
||
SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP |
+44 20 3470 0470 |
|
||
Ewan Leggat Charlie Bouverat Harry Davies-Ball |
|
|||
|
|
|
||
Joint Brokers |
|
|
||
Berenberg |
+44 20 3207 7800 |
|
||
Matthew Armitt |
|
|
||
Jennifer Lee |
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
Buchanan |
+ +44 20 7466 5000 |
|
||
REGIONAL DRILLING PROGRAM
Regional hand-auger drilling south of the Kasiya MRE footprint has identified significant strike extensions of approximately 8km across a number of parallel mineralised zones ranging from 400m to 2km in width.
All newly defined mineralisation remains open at depth, due to the limitations of the hand-auger drilling method but are expected to continue to the saprock boundary normally between 20 and 30m vertical metres from surface. The multiple mineralised zones identified remain open along strike both to the north and south.
Figure 1: Southern newly defined mineralised extensions at Kasiya
Highlight drill results include;
· 14m @ 1.03% incl. 2m @ 1.35% rutile from surface
· 17m @ 1.01% incl. 2m @ 1.42% rutile from surface
· 9m @ 0.93% incl. 2m @1.58% rutile from surface
· 12m @ 1.31% incl. 3m @ 1.97% rutile from surface
· 13m @ 1.02% incl. 3m @ 1.16% rutile from surface
· 12m @ 1.02% rutile & 4.5% graphite incl. 2m @ 1.41% rutile from surface
Competent Person Statement
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr Samuel Moyle, a Competent Person who is a member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM). Mr Moyle is the Exploration Manager of Sovereign Metals Limited and a holder of ordinary shares and unlisted performance rights in Sovereign Metals Limited. Mr Moyle has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’ and as a Qualified Person under the AIM Rules. Mr Moyle consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
The information in this announcement that relates to the Mineral Resource Estimate is extracted from an announcement dated 5 April 2023 entitled ‘Kasiya Indicated Resource Increased by over 80%’ which is available to view at www.sovereignmetals.com.au and is based on, and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Richard Stockwell, a Competent Person, who is a fellow of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Mr Stockwell is a principal of Placer Consulting Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. The original announcement is available to view on www.sovereignmetals.com.au. Sovereign confirms that a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; b) all material assumptions included in the original announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in this announcement have not been materially changed from the original announcement.
The information in this announcement that relates to Production Targets, Ore Reserves, Processing, Infrastructure and Capital Operating Costs, Metallurgy (rutile and graphite) is extracted from an announcement dated 28 September 2023 entitled ‘Kasiya Pre-Feasibility Study Results’ which is available to view at www.sovereignmetals.com.au. Sovereign confirms that: a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; b) all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the Production Target, and related forecast financial information derived from the Production Target included in the original announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in this presentation have not been materially modified from the Announcement.
Ore Reserve for the Kasiya Deposit |
|
||||||
Classification |
Tonnes |
Rutile Grade |
Contained Rutile |
Graphite Grade (TGC) (%) |
Contained Graphite |
RutEq. Grade* |
|
Proved |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
|
Probable |
538 |
1.03% |
5.5 |
1.66% |
8.9 |
2.00% |
|
Total |
538 |
1.03% |
5.5 |
1.66% |
8.9 |
2.00% |
|
* RutEq. Formula: Rutile Grade x Recovery (100%) x Rutile Price (US$1,484/t) + Graphite Grade x Recovery (67.5%) x Graphite Price (US$1,290/t) / Rutile Price (US$1,484/t). All assumptions are taken from this Study ** Any minor summation inconsistencies are due to rounding
Kasiya Total Indicated + Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate at 0.7% rutile cut-off grade |
|||||
Classification |
Resource |
Rutile Grade |
Contained Rutile |
Graphite Grade (TGC) (%) |
Contained Graphite |
Indicated |
1,200 |
1.0% |
12.2 |
1.5% |
18.0 |
Inferred |
609 |
0.9% |
5.7 |
1.1% |
6.5 |
Total |
1,809 |
1.0% |
17.9 |
1.4% |
24.4 |
The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (‘MAR’). Upon the publication of this announcement via Regulatory Information Service (‘RIS’), this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.
Forward Looking Statement
This release may include forward-looking statements, which may be identified by words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, “plans”, and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on Sovereign’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Sovereign, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Sovereign makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.
This announcement has been approved and authorised for release by the Company’s Managing Director & CEO, Frank Eagar.
Appendix I – DRILL RESULTS – Table 2
Rutile and graphite drilling results from Kasiya are shown below in Table 2.
Hole ID |
Interval Thickness |
Rutile % |
TGC % |
From (m) Downhole |
Hole Type |
KYHA1273 |
8.0 |
1.52 |
0.7 |
9.0 |
HA |
incl |
5.0 |
2.08 |
0.3 |
12.0 |
|
KYHA1274 |
9.0 |
0.93 |
2.0 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.58 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1275 |
3.0 |
0.96 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1276 |
6.0 |
0.83 |
0.9 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.25 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1277 |
10.0 |
0.74 |
2.0 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.32 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1278 |
2.0 |
0.95 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1279 |
7.0 |
0.78 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
3.0 |
1.02 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1280 |
12.0 |
0.85 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
3.0 |
1.27 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1281 |
3.0 |
0.78 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1282 |
14.0 |
1.03 |
1.6 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.35 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1283 |
5.0 |
0.80 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.26 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1284 |
2.5 |
0.65 |
4.8 |
7.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.09 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1285 |
2.0 |
1.03 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1286 |
7.0 |
0.73 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.21 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1287 |
10.0 |
0.91 |
3.2 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.54 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1288 |
2.0 |
1.30 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1289 |
2.0 |
0.67 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1290 |
3.0 |
0.59 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1291 |
2.0 |
0.70 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1292 |
5.0 |
0.91 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.28 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1293 |
11.0 |
0.71 |
3.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.18 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1294 |
7.0 |
0.74 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
3.0 |
1.01 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1295 |
3.0 |
0.71 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1296 |
13.0 |
0.76 |
2.7 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1297 |
NSR |
HA |
|||
KYHA1298 |
4.0 |
0.84 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.11 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1299 |
4.0 |
0.85 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.15 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1300 |
14.0 |
0.78 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.00 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1301 |
6.0 |
0.74 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1302 |
4.0 |
0.99 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.30 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1303 |
13.0 |
1.02 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
3.0 |
1.16 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
incl |
2.0 |
1.22 |
4.1 |
8.0 |
|
KYHA1304 |
4.0 |
0.84 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.13 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1305 |
17.0 |
1.01 |
1.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.42 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
incl |
4.0 |
1.43 |
3.2 |
13.0 |
|
KYHA1306 |
6.0 |
0.79 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
3.0 |
1.08 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1307 |
11.0 |
0.77 |
2.7 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.31 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1308 |
12.0 |
0.81 |
0.9 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
3.0 |
1.27 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1309 |
2.0 |
0.56 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1310 |
8.0 |
0.86 |
2.0 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.35 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1311 |
3.0 |
1.07 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
3.0 |
1.07 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1312 |
NSR |
HA |
|||
KYHA1313 |
6.0 |
0.77 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.19 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1314 |
12.0 |
1.02 |
4.5 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.41 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
|
incl |
3.0 |
1.05 |
6.9 |
6.0 |
|
KYHA1315 |
12.0 |
1.31 |
1.6 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
3.0 |
1.97 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
|
incl |
6.0 |
1.14 |
2.3 |
6.0 |
|
KYHA1316 |
6.0 |
1.16 |
1.5 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.49 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
incl |
2.0 |
1.12 |
3.6 |
4.0 |
|
KYHA1317 |
10.0 |
0.75 |
3.2 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.02 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1318 |
10.0 |
0.90 |
0.9 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.75 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1319 |
NSR |
HA |
|||
KYHA1320 |
6.0 |
0.94 |
4.2 |
3.0 |
HA |
incl |
3.0 |
1.15 |
5.6 |
6.0 |
|
KYHA1321 |
2.0 |
0.68 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1322 |
15.0 |
0.66 |
2.0 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1323 |
2.0 |
0.66 |
0.6 |
3.0 |
HA |
KYHA1324 |
6.0 |
0.92 |
1.1 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.35 |
0.6 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1324 |
4.0 |
0.76 |
3.7 |
8.0 |
HA |
KYHA1325 |
5.0 |
0.81 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
5.0 |
1.32 |
0.4 |
12.0 |
APPENDIX II: DRILL HOLE COLLAR DATA – TABLE 3
Hole ID |
Easting |
Northing |
RL |
Depth |
|
Hole ID |
Easting |
Northing |
RL |
Depth |
KYHA1273 |
548398 |
8452800 |
1209 |
17.0 |
KYHA1300 |
549400 |
8457202 |
1207 |
14.0 |
|
KYHA1274 |
548397 |
8452407 |
1205 |
9.0 |
KYHA1301 |
541997 |
8463199 |
1151 |
10.0 |
|
KYHA1275 |
548798 |
8452405 |
1207 |
12.0 |
KYHA1302 |
542401 |
8463198 |
1158 |
11.0 |
|
KYHA1276 |
548796 |
8453205 |
1209 |
13.0 |
KYHA1303 |
542819 |
8463208 |
1159 |
13.0 |
|
KYHA1277 |
548799 |
8452800 |
1208 |
10.0 |
KYHA1304 |
548999 |
8457201 |
1210 |
19.0 |
|
KYHA1278 |
548399 |
8453201 |
1209 |
13.0 |
KYHA1305 |
548598 |
8457197 |
1207 |
17.0 |
|
KYHA1279 |
541598 |
8465602 |
1156 |
12.0 |
KYHA1306 |
548198 |
8457199 |
1198 |
6.0 |
|
KYHA1280 |
542001 |
8465598 |
1151 |
12.0 |
KYHA1307 |
542000 |
8462801 |
1151 |
11.0 |
|
KYHA1281 |
542402 |
8465601 |
1146 |
12.0 |
KYHA1308 |
542401 |
8462800 |
1158 |
12.0 |
|
KYHA1282 |
548800 |
8454400 |
1215 |
15.0 |
KYHA1309 |
542806 |
8462792 |
1158 |
10.0 |
|
KYHA1283 |
549201 |
8454401 |
1225 |
11.0 |
KYHA1310 |
542003 |
8462400 |
1149 |
8.0 |
|
KYHA1284 |
549603 |
8454397 |
1218 |
9.5 |
KYHA1311 |
542402 |
8462400 |
1153 |
8.0 |
|
KYHA1285 |
550004 |
8454400 |
1205 |
12.0 |
KYHA1312 |
542800 |
8462401 |
1154 |
7.0 |
|
KYHA1286 |
550000 |
8454801 |
1209 |
15.0 |
KYHA1313 |
546399 |
8463199 |
1182 |
14.0 |
|
KYHA1287 |
549597 |
8454801 |
1219 |
10.0 |
KYHA1314 |
546000 |
8462801 |
1183 |
12.0 |
|
KYHA1288 |
549198 |
8454801 |
1219 |
17.0 |
KYHA1315 |
546398 |
8462803 |
1184 |
12.0 |
|
KYHA1289 |
548799 |
8454801 |
1211 |
13.0 |
KYHA1316 |
546002 |
8463201 |
1183 |
13.0 |
|
KYHA1290 |
548800 |
8455196 |
1208 |
13.0 |
KYHA1317 |
545999 |
8462402 |
1182 |
10.0 |
|
KYHA1291 |
549199 |
8455199 |
1212 |
16.0 |
KYHA1318 |
546399 |
8462403 |
1185 |
10.0 |
|
KYHA1292 |
549601 |
8455199 |
1214 |
16.0 |
KYHA1319 |
543198 |
8462401 |
1156 |
10.0 |
|
KYHA1293 |
550005 |
8455196 |
1208 |
15.0 |
KYHA1320 |
543198 |
8462803 |
1155 |
9.0 |
|
KYHA1294 |
548200 |
8456800 |
1204 |
14.0 |
KYHA1321 |
543201 |
8463199 |
1154 |
6.0 |
|
KYHA1295 |
548600 |
8456801 |
1213 |
12.0 |
KYHA1322 |
542800 |
8465593 |
1141 |
15.0 |
|
KYHA1296 |
549003 |
8456803 |
1217 |
13.0 |
KYHA1323 |
543198 |
8465598 |
1138 |
5.0 |
|
KYHA1297 |
549399 |
8456797 |
1209 |
14.0 |
KYHA1324 |
541193 |
8465601 |
1160 |
12.0 |
|
KYHA1298 |
549800 |
8456801 |
1200 |
12.0 |
KYHA1325 |
548398 |
8452801 |
1209 |
17.0 |
|
KYHA1299 |
549800 |
8457199 |
1199 |
11.0 |
Appendix III: JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1
SECTION 1 – SAMPLING TECHNIQUES AND DATA
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
Sampling Techniques |
Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
|
A total of 53 hand-auger holes for 639m were drilled at the Kasiya Project to obtain samples for quantitative mineralogical determination.
Hand-Auger samples are composited based on regolith boundaries and sample chemistry, generated by hand-held XRF analysis. Each 1m of sample is dried and riffle-split to generate a total sample weight of 3kg for analysis, generally at 1m-4m intervals. This primary sample is then split again to provide a 1.5kg sample for both rutile and graphite analyses.
|
Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.
|
Drilling and sampling activities are supervised by a suitably qualified Company geologist who is present at all times. All drill samples are geologically logged by the geologist at the drill site/core yard.
Each sample is sun dried and homogenised. Sub-samples are carefully riffle split to ensure representivity. The 1.5kg composite samples are then processed.
An equivalent mass is taken from each sample to make up the composite. A calibration schedule is in place for laboratory scales, sieves and field XRF equipment.
Placer Consulting Pty Ltd (Placer) Resource Geologists have reviewed Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for the collection and processing of drill samples and found them to be fit for purpose. The primary composite sample is considered representative for this style of rutile mineralisation.
|
|
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
|
Logged mineralogy percentages and lithology information is used to determine compositing intervals. Care is taken to ensure that only samples with similar geological characteristics are composited together. |
|
Drilling Techniques |
Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open‐hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face‐sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
|
A total of 53 hand-auger holes for 639m were drilled at the Kasiya Project to obtain samples for quantitative determination of recoverable rutile and Total Graphitic Carbon (TGC).
Hand-auger drilling with 75mm diameter enclosed spiral bits with 1-metre-long steel rods. Each 1m of drill sample is collected into separate sample bags and set aside. The auger bits and flights are cleaned between each metre of sampling to avoid contamination.
Placer has reviewed SOPs for hand-auger drilling and found them to be fit for purpose and support the resource classifications as applied to the MRE.
|
Drill Sample Recovery |
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.
|
Samples are assessed visually for recoveries. The configuration of drilling and nature of materials encountered results in negligible sample loss or contamination. Samples are assessed visually for recoveries. Overall, recovery is good. Drilling is ceased when recoveries become poor once the water table has been reached. Auger drilling samples are actively assessed by the geologist onsite for recoveries and contamination. |
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.
|
The Company’s trained geologists supervise drilling on a 1 team 1 geologist basis and are responsible for monitoring all aspects of the drilling and sampling process. Hand-auger drilling samples are retrieved and placed into large plastic bags. The bags are clearly labelled and delivered back to the laydown at the end of shift for processing.
|
|
Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
|
No relationship is believed to exist between grade and sample recovery. The high percentage of silt and absence of hydraulic inflow from groundwater at this deposit results in a sample size that is well within the expected size range.
No bias related to preferential loss or gain of different materials is observed.
|
|
Logging |
Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation mining studies and metallurgical studies.
|
Geologically, data is collected in detail, sufficient to aid in Mineral Resource estimation.
All individual 1-metre intervals are geologically logged, recording relevant data to a set log-chief template using company codes. A small representative sample is collected for each 1-metre interval and placed in appropriately labelled chip trays for future reference.
|
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography.
|
All logging includes lithological features and estimates of basic mineralogy. Logging is generally qualitative.
|
|
The total length and percentage of the relevant intersection logged
|
100% of samples are geologically logged. |
|
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation |
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.
|
N/A
|
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry. |
Hand-auger samples from the 53 holes drilled are dried, riffle split and composited. Samples are collected and homogenised prior to splitting to ensure sample representivity. ~1.5kg composite samples are processed.
An equivalent mass is taken from each primary sample to make up the composite.
The primary composite sample is considered representative for this style of mineralisation and is consistent with industry standard practice.
|
|
For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.
|
Techniques for sample preparation are detailed on SOP documents verified by Placer Resource Geologists.
Sample preparation is recorded on a standard flow sheet and detailed QA/QC is undertaken on all samples. Sample preparation techniques and QA/QC protocols are appropriate for mineral determination.
|
|
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.
|
The sampling equipment is cleaned after each sub-sample is taken.
Field duplicate, laboratory replicate and standard sample geostatistical analysis is employed to manage sample precision and analysis accuracy.
|
|
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.
|
Sample size analysis is completed to verify sampling accuracy. Field duplicates are collected for precision analysis of riffle splitting. SOPs consider sample representivity. Results indicate a sufficient level of precision for the resource classification.
|
|
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.
|
The sample size is considered appropriate for the material sampled. |
|
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. |
Rutile The Malawi onsite laboratory sample preparation methods are considered quantitative to the point where a non-magnetic mineral concentrate (NM) is generated.
Final results generated are for recovered rutile i.e. the % mass of the sample that is rutile that can be recovered to the non-magnetic component of a HMC.
The HMC is prepared via wet-table, gravity separation at the Lilongwe Laboratory which provides an ideal sample for subsequent magnetic separation and XRF.
All samples (incl. QA) included in this announcement received the following workflow undertaken on-site in Malawi; · Dry sample in oven for 1 hour at 105℃ · Soak in water and lightly agitate · Wet screen at 5mm, 600µm and 45µm to remove oversize and slimes material · Dry +45µm -600mm (sand fraction) in oven for 1 hour at 105℃ · Pass +45µm -600mm (sand fraction) across wet table to generate a heavy mineral concentrate (HMC) · Pan HMC to remove retained light minerals · Dry HMC in oven for 30 minutes at 105℃ · Magnetic separation of the HMC by Carpco magnet @ 16,800G (2.9Amps) into a magnetic (M) and non-magnetic (NM) fraction.
Bag NM fraction and send to Perth, Australia for quantitative chemical and mineralogical determination. · The NM fractions were sent to ALS Metallurgy Perth for quantitative XRF analysis. Samples received XRF_MS.
Graphite All samples are initially checked in and processed to pulp at Intertek-Genalysis Johannesburg. The pulp samples are then dispatched to Intertek-Genalysis Perth where they undergo TGC assay via method C72/CSA. A portion of each test sample is dissolved in dilute hydrochloric acid to liberate carbonate carbon. The solution is filtered using a filter paper and the collected residue is the dried to 425°C in a muffle oven to drive off organic carbon. The dried sample is then combusted in a Carbon/ Sulphur analyser to yield total graphitic or elemental carbon (TGC). The graphitic carbon content is determined by eliminating other carbon forms from the total carbon content. The addition of acid to the sample liberates carbon dioxide thus removing carbonate carbon. Soluble organic carbon will also be removed. Insoluble organic carbon is removed by heating the samples at 425°C in an oxidising environment. The “dried” carbon-bearing sample that is analysed in the resistance furnace is considered to contain only graphitic carbon. An Eltra CS-800 induction furnace infra-red CS analyser is then used to determine the remaining carbon which is reported as Total Graphitic Carbon (TGC) as a percentage.
|
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.
|
Acceptable levels of accuracy and precision have been established. No handheld XRF methods are used for quantitative determination. |
|
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicate, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.
|
Sovereign uses internal and externally sourced wet screening reference material inserted into samples batches at a rate of 1 in 20. The externally sourced, certified standard reference material for HM and Slimes assessment is provided by Placer Consulting.
Accuracy monitoring is achieved through submission of certified reference materials (CRM’s). ALS and Intertek both use internal CRMs and duplicates on XRF analyses. Sovereign also inserts CRMs into the sample batches at a rate of 1 in 20.
Analysis of sample duplicates is undertaken by standard geostatistical methodologies (Scatter, Pair Difference and QQ Plots) to test for bias and to ensure that sample splitting is representative. Standards determine assay accuracy performance, monitored on control charts, where failure (beyond 3SD from the mean) may trigger re-assay of the affected batch.
Examination of the QA/QC sample data indicates satisfactory performance of field sampling protocols and assay laboratories providing acceptable levels of precision and accuracy.
Acceptable levels of accuracy and precision are displayed in geostatistical analyses.
|
|
Verification of sampling & assaying |
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.
|
Results are reviewed in cross-section using Micromine software and any spurious results are investigated. The deposit type and consistency of mineralisation leaves little room for unexplained variance. Extreme high grades are not encountered.
|
The use of twinned holes. |
Twinned holes are not reported here.
|
|
Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. |
All geological field logging data is collected in LogChief logging software. This data is then imported to Datashed5 and validated automatically and then manually.
Sovereigns’ laboratory data is captured onto paper templates or excel and transferred manually to the database.
|
|
Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
|
QEMSCAN of the NM fraction shows dominantly clean and liberated rutile grains and confirms rutile is the only titanium species in the NM fraction.
Recovered rutile is therefore defined and reported here as: TiO2 recovered in the +45 to -600um range to the NM concentrate fraction as a % of the total primary, dry, raw sample mass divided by 95% (to represent an approximation of final product specifications). i.e. recoverable rutile within the whole sample.
|
|
Location of data points |
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.
|
A Trimble R2 Differential GPS is used to pick up the collars. Daily capture at a registered reference marker ensures equipment remains in calibration. No downhole surveying is completed. Given the vertical nature and shallow depths of the holes, drill hole deviation is not considered to significantly affect the downhole location of samples.
|
Specification of the grid system used. |
WGS84 UTM Zone 36 South.
|
|
Quality and adequacy of topographic control. |
DGPS pickups are considered to be high quality topographic control measures.
|
|
Data spacing & distribution |
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. |
The hand-auger holes are spaced on a on a regular grid which is deemed to adequately define the mineralisation under investigation.
|
Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. |
The drill spacing and distribution is considered to be sufficient to establish a degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for further future Mineral Resource estimation.
|
|
Whether sample compositing has been applied. |
Individual 1m intervals have been composited, based on lithology for the 53 hand-auger holes.
|
|
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure |
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known considering the deposit type
|
Sample orientation is vertical and approximately perpendicular to the orientation of the mineralisation, which results in true thickness estimates, limited by the sampling interval as applied. Drilling and sampling are carried out on a regular square grid. There is no apparent bias arising from the orientation of the drill holes with respect to the orientation of the deposit.
|
If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.
|
There is no apparent bias arising from the orientation of the drill holes with respect to the orientation of the deposit. |
|
Sample security |
The measures taken to ensure sample security |
Samples are stored in secure storage from the time of drilling, through gathering, compositing and analysis. The samples are sealed as soon as site preparation is complete.
A reputable international transport company with shipment tracking enables a chain of custody to be maintained while the samples move from Malawi to Australia or Malawi to Johannesburg. Samples are again securely stored once they arrive and are processed at Australian laboratories. A reputable domestic courier company manages the movement of samples within Perth, Australia.
At each point of the sample workflow the samples are inspected by a company representative to monitor sample condition. Each laboratory confirms the integrity of the samples upon receipt.
|
Audits or reviews |
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data
|
Richard Stockwell (resource CP) has reviewed and advised on all stages of data collection, sample processing, QA protocol and mineral resource estimation. Methods employed are considered industry best-practice.
Malawi Field and Laboratory visits have been completed by Richard Stockwell in May 2022. A high standard of operation, procedure and personnel was observed and reported.
|
SECTION 2 – REPORTING OF EXPLORATION RESULTS
Criteria |
Explanation |
Commentary |
Mineral tenement & land tenure status |
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environment settings. |
The Company owns 100% of the following Exploration Licences (ELs) and Retention Licence (RL) under the Mines and Minerals Act (No 8. of 2019), held in the Company’s wholly-owned, Malawi-registered subsidiaries: EL0609, EL0582, EL0492, EL0528, EL0545, EL0561, and EL0657. A 5% royalty is payable to the government upon mining and a 2% of net profit royalty is payable to the original project vendor. No significant native vegetation or reserves exist in the area. The region is intensively cultivated for agricultural crops. |
The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. |
The tenements are in good standing and no known impediments to exploration or mining exist. |
|
Exploration done by other parties
|
Acknowledgement and appraisal of exploration by other parties. |
Sovereign Metals Ltd is a first-mover in the discovery and definition of residual rutile and graphite resources in Malawi. No other parties are involved in exploration. |
Geology |
Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation |
The rutile deposit type is considered a residual placer formed by the intense weathering of rutile-rich basement paragneisses and variable enrichment by eluvial processes. Rutile occurs in a mostly topographically flat area west of Malawi’s capital, known as the Lilongwe Plain, where a deep tropical weathering profile is preserved. A typical profile from top to base is generally soil (“SOIL” 0-1m) ferruginous pedolith (“FERP”, 1-4m), mottled zone (“MOTT”, 4-7m), pallid saprolite (“PSAP”, 7-9m), saprolite (“SAPL”, 9-25m), saprock (“SAPR”, 25-35m) and fresh rock (“FRESH” >35m). The low-grade graphite mineralisation occurs as multiple bands of graphite gneisses, hosted within a broader Proterozoic paragneiss package. In the Kasiya areas specifically, the preserved weathering profile hosts significant vertical thicknesses from near surface of graphite mineralisation. |
Drill hole information |
A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: easting and northings of the drill hole collar; elevation or RL (Reduced Level-elevation above sea level in metres of the drill hole collar); dip and azimuth of the hole; down hole length and interception depth; and hole length |
All collar and composite data are provided in the body and appendices of this report.
|
If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case |
No information has been excluded. |
|
Data aggregation methods |
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high-grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. |
All results reported are of a length-weighted average of in-situ grades. The results reported in the body of the report are on a nominal lower cut-off of 0.5% Rutile and exclude bottom of hole samples where saprock has been geologically logged.
|
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. |
No data aggregation was required. |
|
The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. |
No metal equivalent values are used in this report. |
|
Relationship between mineralisation widths & intercept lengths |
These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. |
The mineralisation has been released by weathering of the underlying, layered gneissic bedrock that broadly trends NE-SW. It lies in a laterally extensive superficial blanket with high-grade zones reflecting the broad bedrock strike orientation of ~045°. |
If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. |
The mineralisation is laterally extensive where the entire weathering profile is preserved and not significantly eroded. Minor removal of the mineralised profile has occurred in alluvial channels. These areas are adequately defined by the drilling pattern and topographical control. |
|
If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’. |
Downhole widths approximate true widths limited to the sample intervals applied. Graphite results are approximate true width as defined by the sample interval and typically increase with depth. |
|
Diagrams |
Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported. These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of the drill collar locations and appropriate sectional views. |
Refer to figures in the body of this report. |
Balanced reporting |
Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high-grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of exploration results. |
All results are included in this report. |
Other substantive exploration data |
Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to: geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. |
Rutile has been determined, by QEMSCAN, to be the major TiO2-bearing mineral at and around several rutile prospects within Sovereign’s ground package. The Company continues to examine areas within the large tenement package for rutile and graphite by-product mineralisation. |
Further work |
The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. test for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). |
No further exploration is planned at this stage. |
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. |
Refer to diagrams in the body of this report. |
Recent Posts
- ECR Minerals #ECR – Collaboration with Geological Survey of Queensland on Lolworth Project
- ECR Minerals #ECR – Salary Sacrifice, Issue of Equity and Total Voting Rights
- Mendell Helium plc #MDH (Formerly Voyager Life plc #VOY) – Update on proposed acquisition of M3 Helium. Change of name to Mendell Helium
- ECR Minerals #ECR – Total Voting Rights
- VVV Resources #VVV – Interim Results for the six months ended 30 June 2024